This check for BADWIDTH might happen while in defercheckwidth, making it raise errors for non-erroneous situations.
Fixes#4495.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6927043
Used to say:
issue4251.go:12: inverted slice range
issue4251.go:12: constant -1 overflows uint64
issue4251.go:16: inverted slice range
issue4251.go:16: constant -1 overflows uint64
issue4251.go:20: inverted slice range
issue4251.go:20: constant -1 overflows uint64
With this patch, only gives the "inverted slice range" errors.
R=golang-dev, daniel.morsing
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6871058
Fixes#4396.
For fixed arrays larger than the unmapped page, agenr would general a nil check by loading the first word of the array. However there is no requirement for the first element of a byte array to be word aligned, so this check causes a trap on ARMv5 hardware (ARMv6 since relaxed that restriction, but it probably still comes at a cost).
Switching the check to MOVB ensures alignment is not an issue. This check is only invoked in a few places in the code where large fixed arrays are embedded into structs, compress/lzw is the biggest offender, and switching to MOVB has no observable performance penalty.
Thanks to Rémy and Daniel Morsing for helping me debug this on IRC last night.
R=remyoudompheng, minux.ma, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6854063
The current spec says that when calling make, if both len and
cap are constant, it is an error if len > cap. The gc
compiler does not yet implement that, but when it does this
will need to change. Changing it now for the benefit of
gccgo.
R=gri
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6867064
The compiler was confused when inlining a T.Method(f()) call
where f returns multiple values: support for this was marked
as TODO.
Variadic calls are not supported but are not inlined either.
Add a test preventively for that case.
Fixes#4167.
R=golang-dev, rsc, lvd
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6871043
Bools from comparisons can be assigned to all bool types, but this idealness would propagate through logical operators when the result should have been lowered to a non-ideal form.
Fixes#3924.
R=golang-dev, remyoudompheng, r, rsc, mtj
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6855061
The stack overflow checker in the linker uses the spadj field
to determine whether stack space will be large enough or not.
When spadj=0, the checker treats the function as a nosplit
and emits an error although the program is correct.
Also enable the stack checker in 8l.
Fixes#4316.
R=rsc, golang-dev
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6855088
When exporting a body containing
x, ok := v.(Type)
the definition for Type was not being included, so when the body
was actually used, it would cause an "unknown type" compiler error.
Fixes#4370.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6827064
The old code worked with gc, I assume because the linker
unified identical strings, but it failed with gccgo.
R=rsc
CC=gobot, golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6826063
Avoids problems with local declarations shadowing other names.
We write a more explicit form than the incoming program, so there
may be additional type annotations. For example:
int := "hello"
j := 2
would normally turn into
var int string = "hello"
var j int = 2
but the int variable shadows the int type in the second line.
This CL marks all local variables with a per-function sequence number,
so that this would instead be:
var int·1 string = "hello"
var j·2 int = 2
Fixes#4326.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6816100
When local declarations needed unexported types, these could
be missing in the export data.
Fixes build with -gcflags -lll, except for exp/gotype.
R=golang-dev, rsc, lvd
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6813067
I fixed a bug in gccgo that was causing it to only give an
error for the first package that was imported and not used.
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6813058
Someone new to the language may not know the connection between ints and arrays, which was the only thing that the previous error told you anything about.
Fixes#4256.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6739048
Since this patch changes the way complex literals are written
in export data, there are a few other glitches.
Fixes#4159.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev, remy
https://golang.org/cl/6674047
The other tests either need a complex procedure
or are architecture- or OS-dependent.
Update #4139.
R=golang-dev, daniel.morsing, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6618062
Also mention that ignoring second blank identifier of range is required by the spec in the code.
Fixes#4173.
R=daniel.morsing, remyoudompheng, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6594043
const1.go:31:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:31:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:33:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:33:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:34:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:35:17: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:35:17: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:35:17: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:35:17: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:35:17: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:36:19: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:15: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:15: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:15: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:15: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:15: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:15: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:38:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:38:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:38:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:38:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:41:20: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:41:20: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:42:20: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:42:20: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:44:28: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:44:28: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:45:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:49:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:50:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:51:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:54:23: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:54:23: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:54:23: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:54:23: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:56:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:57:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:57:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:58:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:58:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:59:22: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:59:22: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:61:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:62:20: error: division by zero
const1.go:65:19: error: floating point constant overflow
const1.go:65:19: error: floating point constant overflow
const1.go:66:28: error: floating point constant overflow
const1.go:66:28: error: floating point constant overflow
const1.go:67:19: error: floating point constant overflow
const1.go:67:19: error: floating point constant overflow
const1.go:68:19: error: division by zero
const1.go:33:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:35:19: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:42:22: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:53:17: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:55:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:59:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:69:20: error: expected integer type
const1.go:75:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type int8 as type int)
const1.go:76:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type int8 as type int)
const1.go:77:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type uint8 as type int)
const1.go:79:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type float32 as type int)
const1.go:80:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type float64 as type int)
const1.go:81:4: error: floating point constant truncated to integer
const1.go:83:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type float64 as type int)
const1.go:84:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type string as type int)
const1.go:85:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type bool as type int)
const1.go:88:7: error: const initializer cannot be nil
const2.go:14:8: error: expected ‘=’
const5.go:27:7: error: expression is not constant
const5.go:28:7: error: expression is not constant
const5.go:30:7: error: expression is not constant
const5.go:31:7: error: expression is not constant
ddd1.go:57:23: error: invalid use of ‘...’ in type conversion
ddd1.go:59:6: error: invalid use of ‘...’ in type conversion
ddd1.go:60:12: error: use of ‘[...]’ outside of array literal
ddd1.go:21:15: error: argument 1 has incompatible type
ddd1.go:22:10: error: argument 1 has incompatible type
ddd1.go:30:6: error: invalid use of ‘...’ with non-slice
ddd1.go:30:6: error: invalid use of ‘...’ with non-slice
ddd1.go:46:2: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:47:2: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:49:2: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:50:6: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:51:6: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:53:6: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:58:13: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:20:10: error: floating point constant truncated to integer
ddd1.go:32:6: error: invalid use of ‘...’ calling non-variadic function
declbad.go:20:3: error: variables redeclared but no variable is new
declbad.go:38:3: error: variables redeclared but no variable is new
declbad.go:44:3: error: variables redeclared but no variable is new
declbad.go:51:3: error: variables redeclared but no variable is new
declbad.go:57:3: error: variables redeclared but no variable is new
declbad.go:63:3: error: variables redeclared but no variable is new
declbad.go:26:3: error: incompatible types in assignment (cannot use type float32 as type int)
declbad.go:32:3: error: incompatible types in assignment (cannot use type int as type float32)
declbad.go:44:3: error: incompatible types in assignment (different number of results)
fixedbugs/bug223.go:21:5: error: initialization expression for ‘m’ depends upon itself
fixedbugs/bug412.go:10:2: error: duplicate field name ‘x’
fixedbugs/bug413.go:11:5: error: initialization expression for ‘i’ depends upon itself
fixedbugs/bug416.go:13:1: error: method ‘X’ redeclares struct field name
fixedbugs/bug435.go:15:49: error: missing ‘)’
fixedbugs/bug435.go:15:2: error: reference to undefined name ‘bar’
fixedbugs/bug451.go:9:9: error: expected package
typeswitch3.go:39:9: error: no new variables on left side of ‘:=’
typeswitch3.go:24:2: error: impossible type switch case (type has no methods)
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6560063
Today, if run.go doesn't understand a test header line it just ignores
the test, making it too easy to write or edit tests that are not actually
being run.
- expand errorcheck to accept flags, so that bounds.go and escape*.go can run.
- create a whitelist of skippable tests in run.go; skipping others is an error.
- mark all skipped tests at top of file.
Update #4139.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6549054
Revision 63f7abcae015 introduced a bug caused by
code assuming registers started at X5, not X0.
Fixes#4138.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev, remy
https://golang.org/cl/6558043
