1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-09-29 10:24:34 -06:00
Commit Graph

22 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Brian Kessler
319787a528 cmd/compile: intrinsify math/bits.Div on amd64
Note that the intrinsic implementation panics separately for overflow and
divide by zero, which matches the behavior of the pure go implementation.
There is a modest performance improvement after intrinsic implementation.

name     old time/op  new time/op  delta
Div-4    53.0ns ± 1%  47.0ns ± 0%  -11.28%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Div32-4  18.4ns ± 0%  18.5ns ± 1%     ~     (p=0.444 n=5+5)
Div64-4  53.3ns ± 0%  47.5ns ± 4%  -10.77%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)

Updates #28273

Change-Id: Ic1688ecc0964acace2e91bf44ef16f5fb6b6bc82
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144378
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2018-11-27 05:04:25 +00:00
Martin Möhrmann
75798e8ada runtime: make processor capability variable naming platform specific
The current support_XXX variables are specific for the
amd64 and 386 platforms.

Prefix processor capability variables by architecture to have a
consistent naming scheme and avoid reuse of the existing
variables for new platforms.

This also aligns naming of runtime variables closer with internal/cpu
processor capability variable names.

Change-Id: I3eabb29a03874678851376185d3a62e73c1aff1d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/91435
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <martisch@uos.de>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2018-11-14 20:30:31 +00:00
Keith Randall
dd789550a7 cmd/compile: intrinsify math/bits.Sub on amd64
name             old time/op  new time/op  delta
Sub-8            1.12ns ± 1%  1.17ns ± 1%   +5.20%          (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Sub32-8          1.11ns ± 0%  1.11ns ± 0%     ~     (all samples are equal)
Sub64-8          1.12ns ± 0%  1.18ns ± 1%   +5.00%          (p=0.016 n=4+5)
Sub64multiple-8  4.10ns ± 1%  0.86ns ± 1%  -78.93%          (p=0.008 n=5+5)

Fixes #28273

Change-Id: Ibcb6f2fd32d987c3bcbae4f4cd9d335a3de98548
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144258
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
2018-10-25 19:47:27 +00:00
Keith Randall
899f3a2892 cmd/compile: intrinsify math/bits.Add on amd64
name             old time/op  new time/op  delta
Add-8            1.11ns ± 0%  1.18ns ± 0%   +6.31%  (p=0.029 n=4+4)
Add32-8          1.02ns ± 0%  1.02ns ± 1%     ~     (p=0.333 n=4+5)
Add64-8          1.11ns ± 1%  1.17ns ± 0%   +5.79%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Add64multiple-8  4.35ns ± 1%  0.86ns ± 0%  -80.22%  (p=0.000 n=5+4)

The individual ops are a bit slower (but still very fast).
Using the ops in carry chains is very fast.

Update #28273

Change-Id: Id975f76df2b930abf0e412911d327b6c5b1befe5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144257
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
2018-10-25 19:47:00 +00:00
Lynn Boger
39fa301bdc test/codegen: enable more tests for ppc64/ppc64le
Adding cases for ppc64,ppc64le to the codegen tests
where appropriate.

Change-Id: Idf8cbe88a4ab4406a4ef1ea777bd15a58b68f3ed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/142557
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-10-16 19:00:53 +00:00
Alberto Donizetti
7c96d87eda test/codegen: test ppc64 TrailingZeros, OnesCount codegen
This change adds codegen tests for the intrinsification on ppc64 of
the OnesCount{64,32,16,8}, and TrailingZeros{64,32,16,8} math/bits
functions.

Change-Id: Id3364921fbd18316850e15c8c71330c906187fdb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/141897
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-10-15 16:53:03 +00:00
Carlos Eduardo Seo
9aed4cc395 cmd/compile: instrinsify math/bits.Mul on ppc64x
Add SSA rules to intrinsify Mul/Mul64 on ppc64x.

benchmark             old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkMul-40       8.80          0.93          -89.43%
BenchmarkMul32-40     1.39          1.39          +0.00%
BenchmarkMul64-40     5.39          0.93          -82.75%

Updates #24813

Change-Id: I6e95bfbe976a2278bd17799df184a7fbc0e57829
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/138917
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-10-02 18:56:06 +00:00
Brian Kessler
9eb53ab9bc cmd/compile: intrinsify math/bits.Mul
Add SSA rules to intrinsify Mul/Mul64 (AMD64 and ARM64).
SSA rules for other functions and architectures are left as a future
optimization.  Benchmark results on AMD64/ARM64 before and after SSA
implementation are below.

amd64
name     old time/op  new time/op  delta
Add-4    1.78ns ± 0%  1.85ns ±12%     ~     (p=0.397 n=4+5)
Add32-4  1.71ns ± 1%  1.70ns ± 0%     ~     (p=0.683 n=5+5)
Add64-4  1.80ns ± 2%  1.77ns ± 0%   -1.22%  (p=0.048 n=5+5)
Sub-4    1.78ns ± 0%  1.78ns ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
Sub32-4  1.78ns ± 1%  1.78ns ± 0%     ~     (p=1.000 n=5+5)
Sub64-4  1.78ns ± 1%  1.78ns ± 0%     ~     (p=0.968 n=5+4)
Mul-4    11.5ns ± 1%   1.8ns ± 2%  -84.39%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Mul32-4  1.39ns ± 0%  1.38ns ± 3%     ~     (p=0.175 n=5+5)
Mul64-4  6.85ns ± 1%  1.78ns ± 1%  -73.97%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Div-4    57.1ns ± 1%  56.7ns ± 0%     ~     (p=0.087 n=5+5)
Div32-4  18.0ns ± 0%  18.0ns ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
Div64-4  56.4ns ±10%  53.6ns ± 1%     ~     (p=0.071 n=5+5)

arm64
name      old time/op  new time/op  delta
Add-96    5.51ns ± 0%  5.51ns ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
Add32-96  5.51ns ± 0%  5.51ns ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
Add64-96  5.52ns ± 0%  5.51ns ± 0%     ~     (p=0.444 n=5+5)
Sub-96    5.51ns ± 0%  5.51ns ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
Sub32-96  5.51ns ± 0%  5.51ns ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
Sub64-96  5.51ns ± 0%  5.51ns ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
Mul-96    34.6ns ± 0%   5.0ns ± 0%  -85.52%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Mul32-96  4.51ns ± 0%  4.51ns ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
Mul64-96  21.1ns ± 0%   5.0ns ± 0%  -76.26%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Div-96    64.7ns ± 0%  64.7ns ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
Div32-96  17.0ns ± 0%  17.0ns ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
Div64-96  53.1ns ± 0%  53.1ns ± 0%     ~     (all equal)

Updates #24813

Change-Id: I9bda6d2102f65cae3d436a2087b47ed8bafeb068
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/129415
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2018-09-26 20:35:57 +00:00
erifan01
204cc14bdd cmd/compile: implement non-constant rotates using ROR on arm64
Add some rules to match the Go code like:
	y &= 63
	x << y | x >> (64-y)
or
	y &= 63
	x >> y | x << (64-y)
as a ROR instruction. Make math/bits.RotateLeft faster on arm64.

Extends CL 132435 to arm64.

Benchmarks of math/bits.RotateLeftxxN:
name            old time/op       new time/op       delta
RotateLeft-8    3.548750ns +- 1%  2.003750ns +- 0%  -43.54%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
RotateLeft8-8   3.925000ns +- 0%  3.925000ns +- 0%     ~     (p=1.000 n=8+8)
RotateLeft16-8  3.925000ns +- 0%  3.927500ns +- 0%     ~     (p=0.608 n=8+8)
RotateLeft32-8  3.925000ns +- 0%  2.002500ns +- 0%  -48.98%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
RotateLeft64-8  3.536250ns +- 0%  2.003750ns +- 0%  -43.34%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)

Change-Id: I77622cd7f39b917427e060647321f5513973232c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122542
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
2018-09-07 14:52:02 +00:00
Michael Munday
f94de9c9fb cmd/compile: make math/bits.RotateLeft{32,64} intrinsics on s390x
Extends CL 132435 to s390x. s390x has 32- and 64-bit variable
rotate left instructions.

Change-Id: Ic4f1ebb0e0543207ed2fc8c119e0163b428138a5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133035
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
2018-09-05 08:29:02 +00:00
Michael Munday
6f9b94ab66 cmd/compile: implement OnesCount{8,16,32,64} intrinsics on s390x
This CL implements the math/bits.OnesCount{8,16,32,64} functions
as intrinsics on s390x using the 'population count' (popcnt)
instruction. This instruction was released as the 'population-count'
facility which uses the same facility bit (45) as the
'distinct-operands' facility which is a pre-requisite for Go on
s390x. We can therefore use it without a feature check.

The s390x popcnt instruction treats a 64 bit register as a vector
of 8 bytes, summing the number of ones in each byte individually.
It then writes the results to the corresponding bytes in the
output register. Therefore to implement OnesCount{16,32,64} we
need to sum the individual byte counts using some extra
instructions. To do this efficiently I've added some additional
pseudo operations to the s390x SSA backend.

Unlike other architectures the new instruction sequence is faster
for OnesCount8, so that is implemented using the intrinsic.

name         old time/op  new time/op  delta
OnesCount    3.21ns ± 1%  1.35ns ± 0%  -58.00%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
OnesCount8   0.91ns ± 1%  0.81ns ± 0%  -11.43%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
OnesCount16  1.51ns ± 3%  1.21ns ± 0%  -19.71%  (p=0.000 n=20+17)
OnesCount32  1.91ns ± 0%  1.12ns ± 1%  -41.60%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
OnesCount64  3.18ns ± 4%  1.35ns ± 0%  -57.52%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)

Change-Id: Id54f0bd28b6db9a887ad12c0d72fcc168ef9c4e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/114675
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
2018-09-03 14:35:38 +00:00
Josh Bleecher Snyder
d9a50a6531 cmd/compile: use prove pass to detect Ctz of non-zero values
On amd64, Ctz must include special handling of zeros.
But the prove pass has enough information to detect whether the input
is non-zero, allowing a more efficient lowering.

Introduce new CtzNonZero ops to capture and use this information.

Benchmark code:

func BenchmarkVisitBits(b *testing.B) {
	b.Run("8", func(b *testing.B) {
		for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
			x := uint8(0xff)
			for x != 0 {
				sink = bits.TrailingZeros8(x)
				x &= x - 1
			}
		}
	})

    // and similarly so for 16, 32, 64
}

name            old time/op  new time/op  delta
VisitBits/8-8   7.27ns ± 4%  5.58ns ± 4%  -23.35%  (p=0.000 n=28+26)
VisitBits/16-8  14.7ns ± 7%  10.5ns ± 4%  -28.43%  (p=0.000 n=30+28)
VisitBits/32-8  27.6ns ± 8%  19.3ns ± 3%  -30.14%  (p=0.000 n=30+26)
VisitBits/64-8  44.0ns ±11%  38.0ns ± 5%  -13.48%  (p=0.000 n=30+30)

Fixes #25077

Change-Id: Ie6e5bd86baf39ee8a4ca7cadcf56d934e047f957
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/109358
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2018-04-26 18:22:28 +00:00
Josh Bleecher Snyder
c5f0104daf cmd/compile: use intrinsic for LeadingZeros8 on amd64
The previous change sped up the pure computation form of LeadingZeros8.
This places it somewhat close to the table lookup form.
Depending on something that varies from toolchain to toolchain
(alignment, perhaps?), the slowdown from ditching the table lookup
is either 20% or 5%.

This benchmark is the best case scenario for the table lookup:
It is in the L1 cache already.

I think we're close enough that we can switch to the computational version,
and trust that the memory effects and binary size savings will be worth it.

Code:

func f8(x uint8)   { z = bits.LeadingZeros8(x) }

Before:

"".f8 STEXT nosplit size=34 args=0x8 locals=0x0
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	TEXT	"".f8(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	FUNCDATA	$0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	FUNCDATA	$1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	MOVBLZX	"".x+8(SP), AX
	0x0005 00005 (x.go:7)	MOVBLZX	AL, AX
	0x0008 00008 (x.go:7)	LEAQ	math/bits.len8tab(SB), CX
	0x000f 00015 (x.go:7)	MOVBLZX	(CX)(AX*1), AX
	0x0013 00019 (x.go:7)	ADDQ	$-8, AX
	0x0017 00023 (x.go:7)	NEGQ	AX
	0x001a 00026 (x.go:7)	MOVQ	AX, "".z(SB)
	0x0021 00033 (x.go:7)	RET

After:

"".f8 STEXT nosplit size=30 args=0x8 locals=0x0
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	TEXT	"".f8(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	FUNCDATA	$0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	FUNCDATA	$1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	MOVBLZX	"".x+8(SP), AX
	0x0005 00005 (x.go:7)	MOVBLZX	AL, AX
	0x0008 00008 (x.go:7)	LEAL	1(AX)(AX*1), AX
	0x000c 00012 (x.go:7)	BSRL	AX, AX
	0x000f 00015 (x.go:7)	ADDQ	$-8, AX
	0x0013 00019 (x.go:7)	NEGQ	AX
	0x0016 00022 (x.go:7)	MOVQ	AX, "".z(SB)
	0x001d 00029 (x.go:7)	RET

Change-Id: Icc7db50a7820fb9a3da8a816d6b6940d7f8e193e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108942
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2018-04-25 21:34:15 +00:00
Josh Bleecher Snyder
1d321ada73 cmd/compile: optimize LeadingZeros(16|32) on amd64
Introduce Len8 and Len16 ops and provide optimized lowerings for them.
amd64 only for this CL, although it wouldn't surprise me
if other architectures also admit of optimized lowerings.

Also use and optimize the Len32 lowering, along the same lines.

Leave Len8 unused for the moment; a subsequent CL will enable it.

For 16 and 32 bits, this leads to a speed-up.

name              old time/op  new time/op  delta
LeadingZeros16-8  1.42ns ± 5%  1.23ns ± 5%  -13.42%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
LeadingZeros32-8  1.25ns ± 5%  1.03ns ± 5%  -17.63%  (p=0.000 n=20+16)

Code:

func f16(x uint16) { z = bits.LeadingZeros16(x) }
func f32(x uint32) { z = bits.LeadingZeros32(x) }

Before:

"".f16 STEXT nosplit size=38 args=0x8 locals=0x0
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	TEXT	"".f16(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	FUNCDATA	$0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	FUNCDATA	$1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	MOVWLZX	"".x+8(SP), AX
	0x0005 00005 (x.go:8)	MOVWLZX	AX, AX
	0x0008 00008 (x.go:8)	BSRQ	AX, AX
	0x000c 00012 (x.go:8)	MOVQ	$-1, CX
	0x0013 00019 (x.go:8)	CMOVQEQ	CX, AX
	0x0017 00023 (x.go:8)	ADDQ	$-15, AX
	0x001b 00027 (x.go:8)	NEGQ	AX
	0x001e 00030 (x.go:8)	MOVQ	AX, "".z(SB)
	0x0025 00037 (x.go:8)	RET

"".f32 STEXT nosplit size=34 args=0x8 locals=0x0
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:9)	TEXT	"".f32(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:9)	FUNCDATA	$0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:9)	FUNCDATA	$1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:9)	MOVL	"".x+8(SP), AX
	0x0004 00004 (x.go:9)	BSRQ	AX, AX
	0x0008 00008 (x.go:9)	MOVQ	$-1, CX
	0x000f 00015 (x.go:9)	CMOVQEQ	CX, AX
	0x0013 00019 (x.go:9)	ADDQ	$-31, AX
	0x0017 00023 (x.go:9)	NEGQ	AX
	0x001a 00026 (x.go:9)	MOVQ	AX, "".z(SB)
	0x0021 00033 (x.go:9)	RET

After:

"".f16 STEXT nosplit size=30 args=0x8 locals=0x0
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	TEXT	"".f16(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	FUNCDATA	$0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	FUNCDATA	$1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	MOVWLZX	"".x+8(SP), AX
	0x0005 00005 (x.go:8)	MOVWLZX	AX, AX
	0x0008 00008 (x.go:8)	LEAL	1(AX)(AX*1), AX
	0x000c 00012 (x.go:8)	BSRL	AX, AX
	0x000f 00015 (x.go:8)	ADDQ	$-16, AX
	0x0013 00019 (x.go:8)	NEGQ	AX
	0x0016 00022 (x.go:8)	MOVQ	AX, "".z(SB)
	0x001d 00029 (x.go:8)	RET

"".f32 STEXT nosplit size=28 args=0x8 locals=0x0
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:9)	TEXT	"".f32(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:9)	FUNCDATA	$0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:9)	FUNCDATA	$1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:9)	MOVL	"".x+8(SP), AX
	0x0004 00004 (x.go:9)	LEAQ	1(AX)(AX*1), AX
	0x0009 00009 (x.go:9)	BSRQ	AX, AX
	0x000d 00013 (x.go:9)	ADDQ	$-32, AX
	0x0011 00017 (x.go:9)	NEGQ	AX
	0x0014 00020 (x.go:9)	MOVQ	AX, "".z(SB)
	0x001b 00027 (x.go:9)	RET

Change-Id: I6c93c173752a7bfdeab8be30777ae05a736e1f4b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108941
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2018-04-25 21:34:04 +00:00
Josh Bleecher Snyder
54dbab5221 cmd/compile: optimize TrailingZeros(8|16) on amd64
Introduce Ctz8 and Ctz16 ops and provide optimized lowerings for them.
amd64 only for this CL, although it wouldn't surprise me
if other architectures also admit of optimized lowerings.

name               old time/op  new time/op  delta
TrailingZeros8-8   1.33ns ± 6%  0.84ns ± 3%  -36.90%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
TrailingZeros16-8  1.26ns ± 5%  0.84ns ± 5%  -33.50%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)

Code:

func f8(x uint8)   { z = bits.TrailingZeros8(x) }
func f16(x uint16) { z = bits.TrailingZeros16(x) }

Before:

"".f8 STEXT nosplit size=34 args=0x8 locals=0x0
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	TEXT	"".f8(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	FUNCDATA	$0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	FUNCDATA	$1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	MOVBLZX	"".x+8(SP), AX
	0x0005 00005 (x.go:7)	MOVBLZX	AL, AX
	0x0008 00008 (x.go:7)	BTSQ	$8, AX
	0x000d 00013 (x.go:7)	BSFQ	AX, AX
	0x0011 00017 (x.go:7)	MOVL	$64, CX
	0x0016 00022 (x.go:7)	CMOVQEQ	CX, AX
	0x001a 00026 (x.go:7)	MOVQ	AX, "".z(SB)
	0x0021 00033 (x.go:7)	RET

"".f16 STEXT nosplit size=34 args=0x8 locals=0x0
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	TEXT	"".f16(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	FUNCDATA	$0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	FUNCDATA	$1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	MOVWLZX	"".x+8(SP), AX
	0x0005 00005 (x.go:8)	MOVWLZX	AX, AX
	0x0008 00008 (x.go:8)	BTSQ	$16, AX
	0x000d 00013 (x.go:8)	BSFQ	AX, AX
	0x0011 00017 (x.go:8)	MOVL	$64, CX
	0x0016 00022 (x.go:8)	CMOVQEQ	CX, AX
	0x001a 00026 (x.go:8)	MOVQ	AX, "".z(SB)
	0x0021 00033 (x.go:8)	RET

After:

"".f8 STEXT nosplit size=20 args=0x8 locals=0x0
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	TEXT	"".f8(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	FUNCDATA	$0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	FUNCDATA	$1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:7)	MOVBLZX	"".x+8(SP), AX
	0x0005 00005 (x.go:7)	BTSL	$8, AX
	0x0009 00009 (x.go:7)	BSFL	AX, AX
	0x000c 00012 (x.go:7)	MOVQ	AX, "".z(SB)
	0x0013 00019 (x.go:7)	RET

"".f16 STEXT nosplit size=20 args=0x8 locals=0x0
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	TEXT	"".f16(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	FUNCDATA	$0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	FUNCDATA	$1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
	0x0000 00000 (x.go:8)	MOVWLZX	"".x+8(SP), AX
	0x0005 00005 (x.go:8)	BTSL	$16, AX
	0x0009 00009 (x.go:8)	BSFL	AX, AX
	0x000c 00012 (x.go:8)	MOVQ	AX, "".z(SB)
	0x0013 00019 (x.go:8)	RET

Change-Id: I0551e357348de2b724737d569afd6ac9f5c3aa11
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108940
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2018-04-25 21:33:52 +00:00
Giovanni Bajo
79112707bb cmd/compile: add patterns for bit set/clear/complement on amd64
This patch completes implementation of BT(Q|L), and adds support
for BT(S|R|C)(Q|L).

Example of code changes from time.(*Time).addSec:

        if t.wall&hasMonotonic != 0 {
  0x1073465               488b08                  MOVQ 0(AX), CX
  0x1073468               4889ca                  MOVQ CX, DX
  0x107346b               48c1e93f                SHRQ $0x3f, CX
  0x107346f               48c1e13f                SHLQ $0x3f, CX
  0x1073473               48f7c1ffffffff          TESTQ $-0x1, CX
  0x107347a               746b                    JE 0x10734e7

        if t.wall&hasMonotonic != 0 {
  0x1073435               488b08                  MOVQ 0(AX), CX
  0x1073438               480fbae13f              BTQ $0x3f, CX
  0x107343d               7363                    JAE 0x10734a2

Another example:

                        t.wall = t.wall&nsecMask | uint64(dsec)<<nsecShift | hasMonotonic
  0x10734c8               4881e1ffffff3f          ANDQ $0x3fffffff, CX
  0x10734cf               48c1e61e                SHLQ $0x1e, SI
  0x10734d3               4809ce                  ORQ CX, SI
  0x10734d6               48b90000000000000080    MOVQ $0x8000000000000000, CX
  0x10734e0               4809f1                  ORQ SI, CX
  0x10734e3               488908                  MOVQ CX, 0(AX)

                        t.wall = t.wall&nsecMask | uint64(dsec)<<nsecShift | hasMonotonic
  0x107348b		4881e2ffffff3f		ANDQ $0x3fffffff, DX
  0x1073492		48c1e61e		SHLQ $0x1e, SI
  0x1073496		4809f2			ORQ SI, DX
  0x1073499		480fbaea3f		BTSQ $0x3f, DX
  0x107349e		488910			MOVQ DX, 0(AX)

Go1 benchmarks seem unaffected, and I would be surprised
otherwise:

name                     old time/op    new time/op     delta
BinaryTree17-4              2.64s ± 4%      2.56s ± 9%  -2.92%  (p=0.008 n=9+9)
Fannkuch11-4                2.90s ± 1%      2.95s ± 3%  +1.76%  (p=0.010 n=10+9)
FmtFprintfEmpty-4          35.3ns ± 1%     34.5ns ± 2%  -2.34%  (p=0.004 n=9+8)
FmtFprintfString-4         57.0ns ± 1%     58.4ns ± 5%  +2.52%  (p=0.029 n=9+10)
FmtFprintfInt-4            59.8ns ± 3%     59.8ns ± 6%    ~     (p=0.565 n=10+10)
FmtFprintfIntInt-4         93.9ns ± 3%     91.2ns ± 5%  -2.94%  (p=0.014 n=10+9)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-4     107ns ± 6%      104ns ± 6%    ~     (p=0.099 n=10+10)
FmtFprintfFloat-4           187ns ± 3%      188ns ± 3%    ~     (p=0.505 n=10+9)
FmtManyArgs-4               410ns ± 1%      415ns ± 6%    ~     (p=0.649 n=8+10)
GobDecode-4                5.30ms ± 3%     5.27ms ± 3%    ~     (p=0.436 n=10+10)
GobEncode-4                4.62ms ± 5%     4.47ms ± 2%  -3.24%  (p=0.001 n=9+10)
Gzip-4                      197ms ± 4%      193ms ± 3%    ~     (p=0.123 n=10+10)
Gunzip-4                   30.4ms ± 3%     30.1ms ± 3%    ~     (p=0.481 n=10+10)
HTTPClientServer-4         76.3µs ± 1%     76.0µs ± 1%    ~     (p=0.236 n=8+9)
JSONEncode-4               10.5ms ± 9%     10.3ms ± 3%    ~     (p=0.280 n=10+10)
JSONDecode-4               42.3ms ±10%     41.3ms ± 2%    ~     (p=0.053 n=9+10)
Mandelbrot200-4            3.80ms ± 2%     3.72ms ± 2%  -2.15%  (p=0.001 n=9+10)
GoParse-4                  2.88ms ±10%     2.81ms ± 2%    ~     (p=0.247 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-4      69.5ns ± 4%     68.6ns ± 2%    ~     (p=0.171 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-4       165ns ± 3%      162ns ± 3%    ~     (p=0.137 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-4      65.7ns ± 6%     64.4ns ± 2%  -2.02%  (p=0.037 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-4       278ns ± 2%      279ns ± 3%    ~     (p=0.991 n=8+9)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-4     99.3ns ± 3%     98.5ns ± 4%    ~     (p=0.457 n=10+9)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-4     30.1µs ± 1%     30.4µs ± 2%    ~     (p=0.173 n=8+10)
RegexpMatchHard_32-4       1.40µs ± 2%     1.41µs ± 4%    ~     (p=0.565 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-4       42.5µs ± 1%     41.5µs ± 3%  -2.13%  (p=0.002 n=8+9)
Revcomp-4                   332ms ± 4%      328ms ± 5%    ~     (p=0.720 n=9+10)
Template-4                 48.3ms ± 2%     49.6ms ± 3%  +2.56%  (p=0.002 n=8+10)
TimeParse-4                 252ns ± 2%      249ns ± 3%    ~     (p=0.116 n=9+10)
TimeFormat-4                262ns ± 4%      252ns ± 3%  -4.01%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)

name                     old speed      new speed       delta
GobDecode-4               145MB/s ± 3%    146MB/s ± 3%    ~     (p=0.436 n=10+10)
GobEncode-4               166MB/s ± 5%    172MB/s ± 2%  +3.28%  (p=0.001 n=9+10)
Gzip-4                   98.6MB/s ± 4%  100.4MB/s ± 3%    ~     (p=0.123 n=10+10)
Gunzip-4                  639MB/s ± 3%    645MB/s ± 3%    ~     (p=0.481 n=10+10)
JSONEncode-4              185MB/s ± 8%    189MB/s ± 3%    ~     (p=0.280 n=10+10)
JSONDecode-4             46.0MB/s ± 9%   47.0MB/s ± 2%  +2.21%  (p=0.046 n=9+10)
GoParse-4                20.1MB/s ± 9%   20.6MB/s ± 2%    ~     (p=0.239 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-4     460MB/s ± 4%    467MB/s ± 2%    ~     (p=0.165 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-4    6.19GB/s ± 3%   6.28GB/s ± 3%    ~     (p=0.165 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-4     487MB/s ± 5%    497MB/s ± 2%  +2.00%  (p=0.043 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-4    3.67GB/s ± 2%   3.67GB/s ± 3%    ~     (p=0.963 n=8+9)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-4   10.1MB/s ± 3%   10.1MB/s ± 4%    ~     (p=0.435 n=10+9)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-4   34.0MB/s ± 1%   33.7MB/s ± 2%    ~     (p=0.173 n=8+10)
RegexpMatchHard_32-4     22.9MB/s ± 2%   22.7MB/s ± 4%    ~     (p=0.565 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-4     24.0MB/s ± 3%   24.7MB/s ± 3%  +2.64%  (p=0.001 n=9+9)
Revcomp-4                 766MB/s ± 4%    775MB/s ± 5%    ~     (p=0.720 n=9+10)
Template-4               40.2MB/s ± 2%   39.2MB/s ± 3%  -2.47%  (p=0.002 n=8+10)

The rules match ~1800 times during all.bash.

Fixes #18943

Change-Id: I64be1ada34e89c486dfd935bf429b35652117ed4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/94766
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2018-03-24 02:38:50 +00:00
Alberto Donizetti
cde34780b7 test/codegen: port math/bits.RotateLeft tests to codegen
Only RotateLeft{64,32} were tested, and just for ppc64. This CL adds
tests for RotateLeft{64,32,16,8} on arm64 and amd64/386, for the cases
where the calls are actually instrinsified.

RotateLeft tests (the last ones for math/bits functions) are deleted
from asm_test.

This CL also adds a space between the "//" and the arch name in the
comments, to uniform this file to the style used in all the other
files.

Change-Id: Ifc2a27261d70bcc294b4ec64490d8367f62d2b89
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/99596
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
2018-03-09 10:53:38 +00:00
Alberto Donizetti
8516ecd05f test/codegen: port math/bits.ReverseBytes tests to codegen
And remove them from ssa_test.

Change-Id: If767af662801219774d1bdb787c77edfa6067770
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/98976
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
2018-03-06 20:34:33 +00:00
Alberto Donizetti
18ae5eca3b test/codegen: port math/bits.OnesCount tests to codegen
And remove them from ssa_test.

Change-Id: I3efac5fea529bb0efa2dae32124530482ba5058e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/98815
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2018-03-06 17:53:00 +00:00
Alberto Donizetti
85dcc709a8 test/codegen: port math/bits.TrailingZeros tests to codegen
And remove them from ssa_test.

Change-Id: Ib5de5c0d908f23915e0847eca338cacf2fa5325b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/98795
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
2018-03-06 11:48:37 +00:00
Alberto Donizetti
83e41b3e76 test/codegen: port math/bits.Leadingzero tests to codegen
Change-Id: Ic21d25db5d56ce77516c53082dfbc010e5875b81
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/98655
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2018-03-05 19:52:04 +00:00
Alberto Donizetti
c1806906d8 test: port bits.Len intrinsics tests to the new codegen harness
This change move bits.Len* intrinsification tests to the new codegen
test harness, removing them from the old ssa_test file. Five different
test functions (one for each bit.Len function tested) was used, to
avoid possible unwanted interactions between multiple calls inside one
function.

Change-Id: Iffd5be55b58e88597fa30a562a28dacb01236d8b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/98156
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
2018-03-05 18:01:19 +00:00