I'm improving gccgo's detection of variables that are only set
but not used, and it triggers additional errors on this code.
The new gccgo errors are correct; gc seems to suppress them
due to the other, expected, errors. This change uses the
variables so that no compiler will complain.
gccgo change is https://golang.org/cl/119920043 .
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/116050043
bug363.go:13:12: error: invalid context-determined non-integer type for shift operand
bug363.go:16:12: error: invalid context-determined non-integer type for shift operand
pointer.go:34:6: error: incompatible type in initialization (pointer to interface type has no methods)
pointer.go:36:6: error: incompatible type in initialization
method2.go:15:1: error: invalid pointer or interface receiver type
method2.go:16:1: error: invalid pointer or interface receiver type
method2.go:21:1: error: invalid pointer or interface receiver type
method2.go:22:1: error: invalid pointer or interface receiver type
method2.go:28:15: error: type ‘*Val’ has no method ‘val’
method2.go:33:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
shift1.go:19:16: error: invalid context-determined non-integer type for shift operand
shift1.go:24:19: error: invalid context-determined non-integer type for shift operand
shift1.go:25:17: error: invalid context-determined non-integer type for shift operand
shift1.go:18:18: error: shift of non-integer operand
shift1.go:26:13: error: floating point constant truncated to integer
shift1.go:33:15: error: integer constant overflow
shift1.go:34:15: error: integer constant overflow
shift1.go:35:17: error: integer constant overflow
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5081051
// ERROR "pattern1" "pattern2"
means that there has to be one or more
lines matching pattern1 and then excluding
those, there have to be one or more lines
matching pattern2. So if you expect two
different error messages from a particular
line, writing two separate patterns checks
that both errors are produced.
Also, errchk now flags lines that produce
more errors than expected. Before, as long as
at least one error matched the pattern, all the
others were ignored.
Revise tests to expect or silence these
additional errors.
R=lvd, r, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4869044
