Previously, test7978 failed if the user did not invoke it with
GOTRACEBACK=2 already set in their environment. Environment-sensitive
test are awkward, and in this case there is a very simple workaround:
set the traceback level to the necessary value explicitly.
Change-Id: I7d576f24138aa8a41392148eae11bbeaef558573
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/63275
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
From the garbage collector's perspective, time can move backwards in
cgocall. However, in the midst of this time warp, the pointer
arguments to cgocall can go from dead back to live. If a stack growth
happens while they're dead and then a GC happens when they become live
again, GC can crash with a bad heap pointer.
Specifically, the sequence that leads to a panic is:
1. cgocall calls entersyscall, which saves the PC and SP of its call
site in cgocall. Call this PC/SP "X". At "X" both pointer arguments
are live.
2. cgocall calls asmcgocall. Call the PC/SP of this call "Y". At "Y"
neither pointer argument is live.
3. asmcgocall calls the C code, which eventually calls back into the
Go code.
4. cgocallbackg remembers the saved PC/SP "X" in some local variables,
calls exitsyscall, and then calls cgocallbackg1.
5. The Go code causes a stack growth. This stack unwind sees PC/SP "Y"
in the cgocall frame. Since the arguments are dead at "Y", they are
not adjusted.
6. The Go code returns to cgocallbackg1, which calls reentersyscall
with the recorded saved PC/SP "X", so "X" gets stashed back into
gp.syscallpc/sp.
7. GC scans the stack. It sees there's a saved syscall PC/SP, so it
starts the traceback at PC/SP "X". At "X" the arguments are considered
live, so it scans them, but since they weren't adjusted, the pointers
are bad, so it panics.
This issue started as of commit ca4089ad, when the compiler stopped
marking arguments as live for the whole function.
Since this is a variable liveness issue, fix it by adding KeepAlive
calls that keep the arguments live across this whole time warp.
The existing issue7978 test has all of the infrastructure for testing
this except that it's currently up to chance whether a stack growth
happens in the callback (it currently only happens on the
linux-amd64-noopt builder, for example). Update this test to force a
stack growth, which causes it to fail reliably without this fix.
Fixes#17785.
Change-Id: If706963819ee7814e6705693247bcb97a6f7adb8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33710
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Some tests cannot build for Android; use build tags and stubs to
skip them.
For #15919
Change-Id: Ieedcb73d4cabe23c3775cfb1d44c1276982dccd9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23634
Run-TryBot: Elias Naur <elias.naur@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
[Repeat of CL 18343 with build fixes.]
Before, NumGoroutine counted system goroutines and Stack (usually) didn't show them,
which was inconsistent and confusing.
To resolve which way they should be consistent, it seems like
package main
import "runtime"
func main() { println(runtime.NumGoroutine()) }
should print 1 regardless of internal runtime details. Make it so.
Fixes#11706.
Change-Id: If26749fec06aa0ff84311f7941b88d140552e81d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18432
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
On Darwin/ARM, because libSystem doesn't provide functions for
__sync_fetch_and_add, and only clang can inline that function,
skip the test when building with GCC.
Change-Id: Id5e9d8f9bbe1e6bcb2f381f0f66cf68aa95277c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2125
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Gccgo can only get a backtrace for the currently running thread, which
means that it can only get a backtrace for goroutines currently running
Go code. When a goroutine is running C code, gccgo has no way to stop
it and get the backtrace. This test is all about getting a backtrace
of goroutines running C code, so it can't work for gccgo.
Change-Id: I2dff4403841fb544da7396562ab1193875fc14c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1904
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
The test doesn't work with GOTRACEBACK != 2.
Diagnose that failure mode.
LGTM=iant
R=golang-codereviews, iant
CC=golang-codereviews, r
https://golang.org/cl/152970043
Normally, the caller to runtime.entersyscall() must not return before
calling runtime.exitsyscall(), lest g->syscallsp become a dangling
pointer. runtime.cgocallbackg() violates this constraint. To work around
this, save g->syscallsp and g->syscallpc around cgo->Go callbacks, then
restore them after calling runtime.entersyscall(), which restores the
syscall stack frame pointer saved by cgocall. This allows the GC to
correctly trace a goroutine that is currently returning from a
Go->cgo->Go chain.
This also adds a check to proc.c that panics if g->syscallsp is clearly
invalid. It is not 100% foolproof, as it will not catch a case where the
stack was popped then pushed back beyond g->syscallsp, but it does catch
the present cgo issue and makes existing tests fail without the bugfix.
Fixes#7978.
LGTM=dvyukov, rsc
R=golang-codereviews, dvyukov, minux, bradfitz, iant, gobot, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews, rsc
https://golang.org/cl/131910043
