eqstring is only called for strings with equal lengths.
Instead of pushing a pointer and length for each argument string
on the stack we can omit pushing one of the lengths on the stack.
Changing eqstrings signature to eqstring(*uint8, *uint8, int) bool
to implement the above optimization would make it very similar to the
existing memequal(*any, *any, uintptr) bool function.
Since string lengths are positive we can avoid code redundancy and
use memequal instead of using eqstring with an optimized signature.
go command binary size reduced by 4128 bytes on amd64.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CompareStringEqual 6.03ns ± 1% 5.71ns ± 1% -5.23% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
CompareStringIdentical 2.88ns ± 1% 3.22ns ± 7% +11.86% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
CompareStringSameLength 4.31ns ± 1% 4.01ns ± 1% -7.17% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
CompareStringDifferentLength 0.29ns ± 2% 0.29ns ± 2% ~ (p=1.000 n=20+20)
CompareStringBigUnaligned 64.3µs ± 2% 64.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.164 n=20+19)
CompareStringBig 61.9µs ± 1% 61.6µs ± 2% -0.46% (p=0.033 n=20+19)
Change-Id: Ice15f3b937c981f0d3bc8479a9ea0d10658ac8df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/53650
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The only non test user of the assembler prefetch functions is the
heapBits.prefetch function which is itself unused.
The runtime prefetch functions have no functionality on most platforms
and are not inlineable since they are written in assembler. The function
call overhead eliminates the performance gains that could be achieved with
prefetching and would degrade performance for platforms where the functions
are no-ops.
If prefetch functions are needed back again later they can be improved
by avoiding the function call overhead and implementing them as intrinsics.
Change-Id: I52c553cf3607ffe09f0441c6e7a0a818cb21117d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44370
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This commit reworks multiway select statements to use normal control
flow primitives instead of the previous setjmp/longjmp-like behavior.
This simplifies liveness analysis and should prevent issues around
"returns twice" function calls within SSA passes.
test/live.go is updated because liveness analysis's CFG is more
representative of actual control flow. The case bodies are the only
real successors of the selectgo call, but previously the selectsend,
selectrecv, etc. calls were included in the successors list too.
Updates #19331.
Change-Id: I7f879b103a4b85e62fc36a270d812f54c0aa3e83
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37661
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Now that we don't rescan stacks, stack barriers are unnecessary. This
removes all of the code and structures supporting them as well as
tests that were specifically for stack barriers.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: Ia29221730e0f2bbe7beab4fa757f31a032d9690c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36620
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
So it could be inlined.
Using bit-tricks it could be implemented without condition
(improved trick version by Minux Ma).
Simple benchmark shows it is faster on i386 and x86_64, though
I don't know will it be faster on other architectures?
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkFastrand-3 2.79 1.48 -46.95%
BenchmarkFastrandHashiter-3 25.9 24.9 -3.86%
Change-Id: Ie2eb6d0f598c0bb5fac7f6ad0f8b5e3eddaa361b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34782
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
I meant to say ~7, instead of ^7, in the review.
Fix build.
Change-Id: I5060bbcd98b4ab6f00251fdb68b6b35767e5acf1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34411
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
