This is necessary to make a relocated GOROOT work correctly.
Fixes#20997
Change-Id: I18624bd2e109721066cd9e4a887a12583ab79f5d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48550
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The current implementation ignores certificates that exist
in the login and System keychains.
This change adds the missing System and login keychain
files to the `/usr/bin/security` command in
`execSecurityRoots`. If the current user cannot be
obtained, the login keychain is ignored.
Refs #16532
Change-Id: I8594a6b8940c58df8a8015b274fa45c39e18862c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36941
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The escaper contains information about which templates have already been
visited and escaped. This information is necessary to prevent templates
that have already been escaped from being over-escaped. However, since we
currently create a new escaper each time we execute a template, this
information does not persist across multiple template executions.
Fix this by saving an escaper in each template name space which is shared by
all templates in that name space.
While there, fix error message formatting for an escaping unit test.
Fixes#20842
Change-Id: Ie392c3e7ce0e0a9947bdf56c99e926e7c7db76e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47256
Reviewed-by: Mike Samuel <mikesamuel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Previous code failed to account for particular control flow
involving nested loops when updating phi function inputs.
Fix involves:
1) remove incorrect shortcut
2) generate a "better" order for children in dominator tree
3) note inner-loop updates and check before applying
outer-loop updates.
Fixes#20675.
Change-Id: I2fe21470604b5c259e777ad8b15de95f7706894d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45791
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
If we get an EAGAIN error on an unpollable file, don't try to wait for
it to be ready; just return EAGAIN.
It's possible that we should instead ensure that when Stdin is a pipe
in non-blocking mode, we wait for data to appear. For now take the
conservative approach of doing what we did in previous releases.
Based on https://golang.org/cl/47555 by Totoro W.
Fixes#20915
Change-Id: Icc9e97a5a877b0a3583ec056c35412d1afab62d1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48490
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
CL 44352 changed the behavior of SIGINT, which can break tests that
themselves use SIGINT. I think we can only implement this if the
testing package has a way to know whether the code under test is using
SIGINT, but os/signal does not provide an API for that. Roll back for
1.9 and think about this again for 1.10.
Updates #19397
Change-Id: I021c314db2b9d0a80d0088b120a6ade685459990
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48370
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
It seems that when too much other code is running on the system,
the testprogcgo code can overrun its timeouts.
Updates #18598.
Not marking the issue as fixed until it doesn't recur for some time.
Change-Id: Ieaf106b41986fdda76b1d027bb9d5e3fb805cc3b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48233
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Usually this test is skipped (on builders and when not root), so
people are unlikely to see this error.
Updates #19296
Change-Id: I3acb81260034dad8776c305f83d7cbac4b718e75
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48191
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
SysV semaphore undo lists should be shared by threads, just like
several other resources listed in cloneFlags. Currently we don't do
this, but it probably doesn't affect anything because 1) probably
nobody uses SysV semaphores from Go and 2) Go-created threads never
exit until the process does. Beyond being the right thing to do,
user-level QEMU requires this flag because it depends on glibc to
create new threads and glibc uses this flag.
Fixes#20763.
Change-Id: I1d1dafec53ed87e0f4d4d432b945e8e68bb72dcd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48170
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
To-be-released NetBSD 7.1.1 reportedly fixes the kernel panic that was
affecting our builders and is being released because of Go's warning.
So, soften our warning.
7.1.1 might work, but I can't get a builder up and running to verify
yet as it appears that Anita either doesn't support it yet, or the
NetBSD CDN doesn't have the files yet.
Change-Id: Ifaafc566879a6afdf1174e545ad10e240da427e8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47970
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TestStackGrowth is currently a parallel test. However, it depends on a
20 second timeout, which is already dubious in a parallel test, and
became really problematic on slow builders when runtime.GC switched to
triggering concurrent GC instead of STW GC. Before that change, the
test spent much of its time in STW GC, so it wasn't *really* parallel.
After that change, it was competing with all of the other parallel
tests and GC likely started taking ~4 times longer. On most builders
the whole test runs in well under a second, but on the slow builders
that was enough to push it over the 20 second timeout.
Fix this by making the test serial.
Updates #19381 (probably fixes it, but we'll have to wait and see).
Change-Id: I21af7cf543ab07f1ec1c930bfcb355b0df75672d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48110
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Elias Naur <elias.naur@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Local variables can also be relied on the be 64-bit aligned, since
they will be escaped to the heap if used with any atomic operations.
Also, allocated arrays are also aligned, just like structs and slices.
Fixes#18955.
Change-Id: I8a1897f6ff78922c8bfcf20d6eb4bcb17a70ba2d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48112
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The current description refers to the outermost "frame" which can be
misleading. A user reading it can think it means a stack frame.
Change-Id: Ie2c7cb4b4db8f41572df206478ce3b46a0245a5d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47850
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
When a local variable is moved to the heap the declaration position
should be preserved so that later on we can assign it to the correct
DW_TAG_lexical_block.
Fixes#20959
Change-Id: I3700ef53c68ccd506d0633f11374ad88a52b2898
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47852
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
ld.addpltsym adds an R_X86_64_JMP_SLOT dynamic relocation to .rela.plt
and uses Addaddrplus to reference the GOT in Elf64_Rela.r_offset.
Addaddrplus results in an R_ADDR relocation, which here we transform
into an R_X86_64_64 dynamic relocation. This is wrong for several
reasons:
1. .rela.plt is not a writable, relro section. It is mapped read-only,
causing the dynamic linker to segfault when it tried to handle the
relocation. This was the immediate cause of internal PIE cgo
crashes.
2. Relocations targetting other reloc sections are, as far as I can
tell, undefined behavior in the ELF spec and are unlikely to be a
good idea.
3. Even if the relocation did work, it isn't what we want. The
relocation, if successfully handled, would have put an absolute
address as the JMP_SLOT offset, but it should be the offset from the
beginning of the binary, just like any other relocation. What we want
is a statically resolved R_ADDR relocation, just as is used below for
the R_X86_64_64 relocation.
Skipping the .rela.plt allows reloc() to handle these R_ADDR
relocations.
With this CL, internal PIE cgo binaries work.
Updates #18968
Change-Id: Ie74e6fe249e88150baa0e340b1cb128cf7f28673
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47837
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
On a slow or distracted machine, 0.1s is sometimes
not long enough for a non-blocking function call to complete.
This causes rare test flakes.
They can be easily reproduced by reducing the wait time to (say) 100ns.
For non-blocking functions, increase the window from 100ms to 10s.
Using different windows for block and non-blocking functions,
allows us to reduce the time for blocking functions.
The risk here is false negatives, but that risk is low;
this test is run repeatedly on many fast machines,
for which 10ms is ample time.
This reduces the time required to run the test by a factor of 10,
from ~1s to ~100ms.
Fixes#20299
Change-Id: Ice9a641a66c6c101d738a2ebe1bcb144ae3c9916
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47812
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently, sysmon waits 60 ms during idle before relaxing. This is
primarily to avoid reducing the precision of short-duration timers. Of
course, if there are no short-duration timers, this wastes 60 ms
running the timer at high resolution.
Improve this by instead inspecting the time until the next timer fires
and relaxing the timer resolution immediately if the next timer won't
fire for a while.
Updates #20937.
Change-Id: If4ad0a565b65a9b3e8c4cdc2eff1486968c79f24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47833
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Currently, sysmon relaxes the Windows timer resolution as soon as the
Go process becomes idle. However, if it's going idle because of a
short sleep (< 15.6 ms), this can turn that short sleep into a long
sleep (15.6 ms).
To address this, wait for 60 ms of idleness before relaxing the timer
resolution. It would be better to check the time until the next wakeup
and relax immediately if it makes sense, but there's currently no
interaction between sysmon and the timer subsystem, so adding this
simple delay is a much simpler and safer change for late in the
release cycle.
Fixes#20937.
Change-Id: I817db24c3bdfa06dba04b7bc197cfd554363c379
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47832
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This reverts commit 168eb9cf33.
CL 47831 fixes the issue with plugins on ARMv5, so we can re-enable the test.
Updates #19674.
Change-Id: Idcb29f93ffb0460413f1fab5bb82fa2605795038
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47834
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
R11 is callee-save in the C ABI, but the temporary register in the Go
ABI. Currently it's being clobbered by runtime.addmoduledata, which
has to follow the C ABI. The observed effect of this was that
dl_open_worker was returning to a bad PC because after it failed to
restore its SP because it was using R11 as a frame pointer.
Fix this by saving R11 around addmoduledata.
Fixes#19674.
Change-Id: Iaacbcc76809a3aa536e9897770831dcbcb6c8245
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47831
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
A lot of code that uses runtime.Callers makes assumptions about the
result that are not true today under gccgo and will not be true in the
future in gc. This adds a section to the release notes discussing how
to correctly use runtime.Callers.
Change-Id: I96b7c7ef183cee2061442fc3501fceceefa54c09
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47691
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
CL 47341 added support for decoding non-padded messages. But DecodedLen
still returned a multiple of 5 for messages without a padding, even
though it is possible to calculate the len exactly when using NoPadding.
This change makes DecodedLen return the exact number of bytes that
will be written. A change to the decoding logic is also made so that it
can handle this case.
DecodedLen now has the same behaviour as DecodedLen in encoding/base64.
Fixes#20854
Change-Id: I729e0b1c0946c866fb675c854f835f366dd4b5a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47710
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently only the rwmutex write lock prevents descheduling. The read
lock does not. This leads to the following situation:
1. A reader acquires the lock and gets descheduled.
2. GOMAXPROCS writers attempt to acquire the lock (or at least one
writer does, followed by readers). This blocks all of the Ps.
3. There is no 3. The descheduled reader never gets to run again
because there are no Ps, so it never releases the lock and the system
deadlocks.
Fix this by preventing descheduling while holding the read lock. This
requires also rewriting TestParallelRWMutexReaders to always create
enough GOMAXPROCS and to use non-blocking operations for
synchronization.
Fixes#20903.
Change-Id: Ibd460663a7e5a555be5490e13b2eaaa295fac39f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47632
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
ResolveTCPAddr, ResolveUDPAddr, and ResolveIPAddr return at most one
address. When given a name like "golang.org" to resolve that might
have more than 1 address, the net package has historically preferred
IPv4 addresses, with the assumption that many users don't yet have
IPv6 connectivity and randomly selecting between an IPv4 address and
an IPv6 address at runtime wouldn't be a good experience for IPv4-only
users.
In CL 45088 (78cf0e56) I modified the resolution of the
unspecified/empty address to internally resolve to both IPv6 "::" and
0.0.0.0 to fix issue #18806.
That code has 3 other callers I hadn't considered, though: the
Resolve*Addr functions. Since they preferred IPv4, any Resolve*Addr of
"[::]:port" or "::" (for ResolveIPAddr) would internally resolve both
"::" and 0.0.0.0 and then prefer 0.0.0.0, even though the user was
looking up an IPv6 literal.
Add tests and fix it, not by undoing the fix to #18806 but by
selecting the preference function for Resolve*Addr more explicitly: we
still prefer IPv4, but if the address being looked up was an IPv6
literal, prefer IPv6.
The tests are skipped on machines without IPv6.
Fixes#20911
Change-Id: Ib7036cc43182ae4118cd1390c254e17c04a251a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47554
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The text before CL 45816 was:
-timeout t
If a test runs longer than t, panic.
The default is 10 minutes (10m).
CL 45816 was supposed to be about clarifying test vs test binary,
and it did add the clarification of referring to "duration d",
but it also introduced incorrect text about timeout 0.
The new text in this CL preserves the good change and
eliminates the incorrect one:
-timeout d
If a test binary runs longer than duration d, panic.
The default is 10 minutes (10m).
For #14780.
Change-Id: I4f79d6e48ed9295bc9f34a36aa90d3b03b40d7f5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47571
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Following the spec clarification in CL 40393, copy that text
to reflect docs to state that the initial capacity of MakeMapWithSize
is a hint/approximate.
Fixes#19903
Change-Id: I6b3315b8183cafaa61fbb2839a4e42b76fd71544
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46270
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Go 1.9 beta 2 is already out.
It's too late to break code with a change like this.
This can be rolled forward for Go 1.10.
This reverts commit ae238688d2.
Change-Id: Ib67b8629e3deac5d50d76581aba6a91ca7a7853e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47570
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The name LabelList was changed to LabelSet during the development of the
proposal [1], except in one function comment. This commit fixes that.
Fixes#20905.
[1] https://github.com/golang/go/issues/17280
Change-Id: Id4f48d59d7d513fa24b2e42795c2baa5ceb78f36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47470
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
mheap.allocLarge just calls bestFitTreap and is the only caller of
bestFitTreap. Flatten these into a single function. Also fix their
comments: allocLarge claims to return exactly npages but can in fact
return a larger span, and h.freelarge is not in fact indexed by span
start address.
Change-Id: Ia20112bdc46643a501ea82ea77c58596bc96f125
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47315
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
The Server struct has exported fields, which allows users to manually
create a Server object without using using NewServer or NewTLSServer
and directly call Start or StartTLS on their object.
In order to ensure that manual creation of Server works, the
NewUnstartedServer function should not initialize Server in any way
that the user was not able to do themselves. For example, the setting
of a unexported filed, client, is not something a user can do.
Thus, rather than setting the client field in NewUnstartedServer,
we lazily initialize it when Start or StartTLS is called.
Otherwise, the Server logic can nil panic later when it assumes that this
field has been initialized.
Fixes#20871
Change-Id: I65c6a9f893ea963b0fbad0990b33af08007c1140
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47353
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The Func type has allowed calling the Func.Name method on a nil pointer
since Go1.2, where it returned an empty string. A regression caused by
CL/37331 caused this behavior to change. This breaks code that lazily
does runtime.FuncForPC(myPtr).Name() without first checking that myPtr
is actually non-nil.
Fixes#20872
Change-Id: Iae9a2ebabca5e9d1f5a2cdaf2f30e9c6198fec4f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47354
Reviewed-by: Marvin Stenger <marvin.stenger94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Wrong instructions "MOVW 8(F0), R1" and "MOVW R0<<0(F1), R1"
are silently accepted, and all Fx are treated as Rx.
The patch checks all those illegal base registers.
fixes#20724
Change-Id: I05d41bb43fe774b023205163b7daf4a846e9dc88
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46132
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
If a retryable error such as EAGAIN/EINTR is encountered during a call
to sendfile(), we should not assume that a partial write occurred.
Instead, just like any other platform, we should always try again even
if 0 bytes were written.
Fixes#20857
Change-Id: I9aa48d193c27c6794c550320da4d3f7544041f37
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47351
Run-TryBot: Shawn Walker-Salas <shawn.walker@oracle.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The current code calculates register number incorrectly.
The fix corrects the register number calculation.
Add cases created by decoder to test assembler.
Fixes#20697Fixes#20723
Change-Id: I73ac153df9ea9f51c43a5104828d7a5389551c92
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45850
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
