Add a test for the bug reported in golang/go#37049: we are missing empty
diagnostics for deleted files. Doing this involved added a missing
RemoveFile method on the fake.Watcher type.
Skip the test for now, as it is failing.
Updates golang/go#37049
Updates golang/go#36879
Change-Id: Ib3b6907455cc44a2e6af00c2254aa444e9480749
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218278
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
A lot of bug reports originating from LSP clients are related to either
the timing or sequence of editor interactions with gopls (or at least
they're originally reported this way). For example: "when I open a
package and then create a new file, I lose diagnostics for existing
files". These conditions are often hard to reproduce, and to isolate as
either a gopls bug or a bug in the editor.
Right now we're relying on govim integration tests to catch these
regressions, but it's important to also have a testing framework that
can exercise this functionality in-process. As a starting point this CL
adds test fakes that implement a high level API for scripting editor
interactions. A fake workspace can be used to sandbox file operations; a
fake editor provides an interface for text editing operations; a fake
LSP client can be used to connect the fake editor to a gopls instance.
Some tests are added to the lsprpc package to demonstrate the API.
The primary goal of these fakes should be to simulate an client that
complies to the LSP spec. Put another way: if we have a bug report that
we can't reproduce with our regression tests, it should either be a bug
in our test fakes or a bug in the LSP client originating the report.
I did my best to comply with the spec in this implementation, but it
will certainly develop as we write more tests. We will also need to add
to the editor API in the future for testing more language features.
Updates golang/go#36879
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: Ib81188683a7066184b8a254275ed5525191a2d68
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/217598
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Previously, the process of instantiating and running the LSP server was
sharded across the lsp, protocol, and cmd packages, and this resulted in
some APIs that are hard to work with. For example, it's hard to guess
the difference between lsp.NewClientServer, lsp.NewServer,
protocol.NewServer (which returns a client), and protocol.NewClient
(which returns a server).
This change reorganizes Server instantiation as follows:
+ The lsp.Server is now purely an implementation of the protocol.Server
interface. It is no longer responsible for installing itself into the
jsonrpc2 Stream, nor for running itself.
+ A new package 'lsprpc' is added, to implement the logic of binding an
incoming connection to an LSP server session. This is put in a
separate package for lack of a clear home: it didn't really
philosophically belong in any of the lsp, cmd, or protocol packages.
We can perhaps move it to cmd in the future, but I'd like to keep it
as a separate package while I develop request forwarding.
simplified import graph:
jsonrpc2 ⭠ lsprpc ⭠ cmd
⭩ ⭦
lsp (t.b.d. client tests)
⭩ ⭨
protocol source
+ The jsonrpc2 package is extended to have a minimal API for running a
'StreamServer': something analogous to an HTTP server that listens
for new connections and delegates to a handler (but we couldn't use
the word 'Handler' for this delegate as it was already taken).
After these changes, I hope that the concerns of "serving the LSP",
"serving jsonrpc2", and "installing the LSP on jsonrpc2" are more
logically organized, though one legitimate criticism is that the word
'Server' is still heavily overloaded.
This change prepares a subsequent change which hijacks the jsonrpc2
connection when forwarding messages to a shared gopls instance.
To test this change, the following improvements are made:
+ A servertest package is added to make it easier to run a test against
an in-process jsonrpc2 server. For now, this uses TCP but it could
easily be modified to use io.Pipe.
+ cmd tests are updated to use the servertest package. Unfortunately it
wasn't yet possible to eliminate the concept of `remote=internal` in
favor of just using multiple sessions, because view initialization
involves calling both `go env` and `packages.Load`, which slow down
session startup significantly. See also golang.org/issue/35968.
Instead, the syntax for `-remote=internal` is modified to be
`-remote=internal@127.0.0.1:12345`.
+ An additional test for request cancellation is added for the
sessionserver package. This test uncovered a bug: when calling
Canceller.Cancel, we were using id rather than &id, which resulted in
incorrect json serialization (as only the pointer receiver implements
the json.Marshaller interface).
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: I75c219df634348cdf53a9e57839b98588311a9ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/215742
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
