Calculate and display very crude memory usage statistics. This is
complicated by various levels of sharing and indirection, so the numbers
should be taken with *large* grains of salt and interpreted mostly by
experts.
Still, the results are interesting and helpful.
Change-Id: Ia9aff974c7d5fddd63df0cfd5cecc08ead33cf84
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/236163
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
We seem to be leaking cache entries. A simple status page will help us
confirm that.
Change-Id: I485bfff6ebfb5d30655554487583e15a3f49f9a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/217597
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Late into CL 206879 I started nulling out a handle's function when the
handle finished running. That invalidated a previous assumption that the
field was immutable. Fix the assumption, and since the case of having
multiple computations in flight is at least a little bit possible, try
harder to avoid duplicate work.
Fixesgolang/go#35995.
Change-Id: Ib5e3640f931f95e35748f28f5a82cf75585b305d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/210077
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
If a user is typing fast, they will quickly invalidate many snapshots.
We don't want to stack up a bunch of stale type check and analysis
operations, so we should propagate cancellation through the cache.
Handles are long-lived, so we may cancel an operation only to
restart it again later. Also, there may be multiple operations waiting on
the same computation, and just because one is cancelled doesn't mean we
should necessarily stop. The easiest way to support all that was to add
an explicit state to each handle, and track the number of waiters.
See the code for more details on Handle life cycles.
As far as I can tell, the rest of gopls is prepared for this behavior.
I added an explicit check to the type checking code, where I was worried
it might get overly confused. But long-term it would probably be good to
return an error from Get.
Change-Id: I3ea6e141b52b94300a41248d3f2e039b023709d0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/206879
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
This is to remove the confusion around having only handles that have had Get
called pin the value into memory.
Instead now there is a single handle per key, and it is the handle that is
weakly held not the value.
Change-Id: I9e813a0dfe2adf4cb651af9b5cfc8878fa71c041
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/186839
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
For all uses inside the lsp we use the detatch logic instead
For tests we build it in the test harness instead
This is in preparation for things on the context becomming important
Change-Id: I7e6910e0d3581b82abbeeb09f9c22a99efb73142
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/185677
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This adds the ability to tie a background context to the context that created it
in traces, and also cleans up and annotates the context used in type checking.
This gives us detailed connected traces of all the type checking and parsing
logic.
Change-Id: I32721220a50ecb9b4404a4e9354343389d7a5219
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/183757
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change is more of an exercise for myself to better understand the
implementation of the memoize package. It adds detailed documentation
for the get function in particular.
I also modified the tests to use a table-driven test format. I'm not
certain if this was the right approach (in case we want to add a
different type of test case in the future), but for now, it seems to
work fine.
Change-Id: I191a3b65af230e0af54b221c9f671582adec6c79
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/181685
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
This library holds onto results with a weak reference, and guarantees that for
as long as
a result has not been garbage collected it will return the same result for the
same key.
Change-Id: I4a4528f31bf8bbf18809cbffe95dc93e05d769fe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/180845
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
