I just committed a patch to gccgo that notices that float was
never defined, causing an additional unmatched error message.
Rename the type to avoid that message.
R=golang-dev, minux.ma
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6947049
This check for BADWIDTH might happen while in defercheckwidth, making it raise errors for non-erroneous situations.
Fixes#4495.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6927043
Used to say:
issue4251.go:12: inverted slice range
issue4251.go:12: constant -1 overflows uint64
issue4251.go:16: inverted slice range
issue4251.go:16: constant -1 overflows uint64
issue4251.go:20: inverted slice range
issue4251.go:20: constant -1 overflows uint64
With this patch, only gives the "inverted slice range" errors.
R=golang-dev, daniel.morsing
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6871058
Fixes#4396.
For fixed arrays larger than the unmapped page, agenr would general a nil check by loading the first word of the array. However there is no requirement for the first element of a byte array to be word aligned, so this check causes a trap on ARMv5 hardware (ARMv6 since relaxed that restriction, but it probably still comes at a cost).
Switching the check to MOVB ensures alignment is not an issue. This check is only invoked in a few places in the code where large fixed arrays are embedded into structs, compress/lzw is the biggest offender, and switching to MOVB has no observable performance penalty.
Thanks to Rémy and Daniel Morsing for helping me debug this on IRC last night.
R=remyoudompheng, minux.ma, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6854063
The current spec says that when calling make, if both len and
cap are constant, it is an error if len > cap. The gc
compiler does not yet implement that, but when it does this
will need to change. Changing it now for the benefit of
gccgo.
R=gri
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6867064
The compiler was confused when inlining a T.Method(f()) call
where f returns multiple values: support for this was marked
as TODO.
Variadic calls are not supported but are not inlined either.
Add a test preventively for that case.
Fixes#4167.
R=golang-dev, rsc, lvd
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6871043
Bools from comparisons can be assigned to all bool types, but this idealness would propagate through logical operators when the result should have been lowered to a non-ideal form.
Fixes#3924.
R=golang-dev, remyoudompheng, r, rsc, mtj
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6855061
The stack overflow checker in the linker uses the spadj field
to determine whether stack space will be large enough or not.
When spadj=0, the checker treats the function as a nosplit
and emits an error although the program is correct.
Also enable the stack checker in 8l.
Fixes#4316.
R=rsc, golang-dev
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6855088
When exporting a body containing
x, ok := v.(Type)
the definition for Type was not being included, so when the body
was actually used, it would cause an "unknown type" compiler error.
Fixes#4370.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6827064
The old code worked with gc, I assume because the linker
unified identical strings, but it failed with gccgo.
R=rsc
CC=gobot, golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6826063
Avoids problems with local declarations shadowing other names.
We write a more explicit form than the incoming program, so there
may be additional type annotations. For example:
int := "hello"
j := 2
would normally turn into
var int string = "hello"
var j int = 2
but the int variable shadows the int type in the second line.
This CL marks all local variables with a per-function sequence number,
so that this would instead be:
var int·1 string = "hello"
var j·2 int = 2
Fixes#4326.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6816100
When local declarations needed unexported types, these could
be missing in the export data.
Fixes build with -gcflags -lll, except for exp/gotype.
R=golang-dev, rsc, lvd
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6813067
I fixed a bug in gccgo that was causing it to only give an
error for the first package that was imported and not used.
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6813058
Someone new to the language may not know the connection between ints and arrays, which was the only thing that the previous error told you anything about.
Fixes#4256.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6739048
Since this patch changes the way complex literals are written
in export data, there are a few other glitches.
Fixes#4159.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev, remy
https://golang.org/cl/6674047
The other tests either need a complex procedure
or are architecture- or OS-dependent.
Update #4139.
R=golang-dev, daniel.morsing, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6618062
