Assigning a slice to the appendage of itself is common and tedious
enough to warrant a special case completion candidate. We now offer
smarter "append()" candidates:
var foo []int
foo = app<> // offer "append(foo, <>)"
fo<> // offer "foo = append(foo, <>)"
The latter is only offered if the best completion candidate is a
slice. It is inserted as the second-best candidate because it seems
impossible to avoid annoying false positives if it is ranked first.
I added a new debug option to disable literal completions. This was to
clean up some test logic that was disabling snippets for all tests
just to defeat literal completions. My tests were failing mysteriously
due to having snippets disabled, and it was hard to figure out why.
Change-Id: I3e8313e00a1409840cb99d5d71c593435a7aeb71
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221777
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The code was introducting syntax errors for some edge cases (example in
regtest/import_test.go), and I found it hard to follow.
The new code passes all the tests. There are new regtests to guarantee
no CodeActions are returned for some cases that vim testing noticed.
Change-Id: Ia09da667f74673c11bfe185e4f76a76c66940105
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/233117
Run-TryBot: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
The priorities for which comment to show should be 1) documentation
directly above the var/const, 2) documentation for the var/const block,
3) line comments.
See https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-go/issues/3240.
Change-Id: Ie136f0f25ac8208147070682bb1f3a663d6da25f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/234101
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
When on 1.15+, enable TypecheckCgo. This improves cgo support
significantly, but we'll still have trouble with newly-referenced C
identifiers and changes to the magic comment.
Updates golang/go#35721.
Change-Id: I44dc95ce2d91d552e1e66e3722dc4230ab59fedd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/229779
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In a later CL we include the fully qualified path to a symbol in the
Name field of SymbolInformation. This means that we end up with
matches like:
golang.org/x/tools/internal/lsp/workspacesymbol/b.WorkspaceSymbolVariableB
A fuzzy match against this name using the query "wsym" would match the
"workspacesymbol" of the import path as well as the
"WorkspaceSymbolVariableB" that is the symbol name itself.
Therefore we rename the symbols in the:
internal/lsp/testdata/lsp/primarymod/workspacesymbol/...
from WorkspaceSymbol* to RandomGopher*, which allows our fuzzy matches
to be more precise.
Change-Id: Idbeb663f5750cae4835b0fdaa77531e30353fb89
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/228759
Run-TryBot: Paul Jolly <paul@myitcv.org.uk>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
This should provide simple name completions for comments
above exported vars, constants, functions, and types.
Can be activated with `ctrl+space` within a comment.
Also fixes a panic introduced in the previous commit when completing comments that occur at the end of a file.
Fixes#34010Fixes#38793
Demo: https://i.imgur.com/qN82CVA.mp4
Change-Id: If9aaec7ce03a3e085361144bce5c7a66535127d1
GitHub-Last-Rev: b9ac874c7ff3c9a164ba698d0d561141a59e2435
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#224
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/230215
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We had previously not been generating documentation on hover for
package declarations or import specs. We do this by adding a few special
cases, since package declarations don't appear in type information.
Throughout, we make the assumption that only one file in a package will
have the documentation for the package. go/doc just appends
documentation as it sees it. We may be able to do better by checking for
a "Package ..." but that still is not guaranteed. Not sure what the
right approach is, so this assumption may be the best option.
Fixesgolang/go#38526
Change-Id: Ibc515f8729e1aba0d11090be62371be6b18d0cfa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/230417
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Don't show non-vet analyses when they appear in generated files. Vet
analyzers will give useful reports even in generated files.
Fixesgolang/go#38467
Change-Id: I0e628760b386553932de4cf1f5ba39784a205b53
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/230597
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
There were a few cases where we were not properly qualifying package
names, particularly if the original package had a named import. Now,
we map between these names correctly - handling the case of multiple
packages that need to be qualified. This requires applying edits to
*ast.SelectorExprs, as well as *ast.Idents.
We still do not fully qualify unimported packages, and likely won't,
unless that's an issue for many users.
Updates golang/go#38591
Change-Id: I966a4d1f936f37ede89362d03da3ff98d8952a06
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/229979
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
In cases like:
var v interface{}
fmt.Println(<>)
Completing to "v" would insert "v..." instead of "v". This was due to
a mixup where we were checking if the variadic type "[]interface{}"
was assignable to the candidate type "interface{}" instead of the
other way around.
Fixesgolang/go#38652.
Change-Id: I27c0b50bbf4b895924c8ed2c0c9dd6785e98cbe1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/229921
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change improves our approach to handling type aliases. Previously,
we were not fully qualifying the names in the AST, making the code
inserted in completions incorrect at times. Now, we clone the relevant
AST expr and qualify it. We also add handling for the return values of a
function, instead of just the parameters.
Fixesgolang/go#38230Fixesgolang/go#37283
Change-Id: Ib79f4636891c9b610ae848e9fa4dbae7c63db509
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/229319
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
The code for formatting function signatures is fairly confusing.
Factoring out an unexported signature type simplifies things a bit.
Hopefully we'll be able to pull out more formatting logic from the other
features. Ideally, I'd like to return to the separation between
internal/lsp/source and internal/lsp so that a formatting package can be
pulled out and used in internal/lsp.
Change-Id: I7428db5004eab371e46402188e0dc6bb30f0c425
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/229318
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Currently, where a package has a test variant, we end up walking the
non-_test.go files twice: once when walking the package itself, the
second time when walking the test variant. In the gopls tests, this
means we end up double-counting the number of symbols (via the @symbol
annotation) in a package.
Extend the existing expect_test.go to demonstrate the problem is fixed
(a test which fails when the fix is not in place)
Change-Id: Ifd68b3d86e24f19d3f8efc3af71494b7d28b0acb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/228761
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In preparation for a later change where we alter the implementation of
the workspace Symbol method, we now specify the Name that should be used
when constructing a SymbolInformation value from a @symbol annocation.
There is no change in the test expectations.
Change-Id: I4ee5f714d6060aab2ee33ef18339504f443cecdc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/228757
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The fix is just a missing return.
Also clean up a staticcheck thing, regenerate the golden files.
Fixesgolang/go#38417
Change-Id: I290b63df9d97211c59d6399fda7a273bc700fbdb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/228297
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
This change is the first step in handling golang/go#38136. Instead of
creating multiple diagnostic reports for type error analyzers, we add
suggested fixes to the existing reports. To match the analyzers for
FindAnalysisError, we add an ErrorMatch function to source.Analyzer.
This is not an ideal solution, but it was the best one I could come up
with without modifying the go/analysis API. analysisinternal could be
used for this purpose, but it seemed to complicated to be worth it, and
this is fairly simple. I think that go/analysis itself might need to be
extended for type error analyzers, but these temporary measures will
help us understand the kinds of features we need for type error
analyzers.
A follow-up CL might be to not add reports for type error analyzers
until the end of source.Diagnostic, which would remove the need for the
look-up.
Fixesgolang/go#38136
Change-Id: I25bc6396b09d49facecd918bf5591d2d5bdf1b3a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/226777
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
We need to search all transitive dependencies of a package, not just its
immediate imports.
Fixesgolang/go#38100
Change-Id: I15b4dbe226ba851691ca0c95460c3648ede32f04
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/227030
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
This change adds a quick fix for type errors of the type "no result values expected". It will replace the return statment with an empty return statement.
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: I3885748dfc69a2d19f8e7a2e81f36f6d0a20d25b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223666
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds a quick fix for diagnostics that have an error message of the form "undeclared name: %s". It provides a quick fix to add a new variable with that name.
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: I6534ee79d1770d1a62bac169c3c7e52e2443f39e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222237
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
As part of investigating golang/go#38100, I noticed a few things that I
wanted to clean up. Mostly, for renames, we were calling
qualifiedObjAtProtocolPos twice, so I factored out a shared helper
function. I also added an error return for builtins so that callers
don't have to check.
Change-Id: I28c75c801cbec1611736af931cfa72befd219201
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/225777
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
A common annoying mis-completion is as follows:
type foo struct {
field int
}
func (f foo) Field() int { return f.field }
func (f foo) logic() {
if f.f<>
}
Now at <> we prefer "field" over "Field()". Similarly:
type foo struct {
}
func (f foo) DoSomething() { }
func (f foo) doSomething() { }
func (f foo) logic() {
f.d<>
}
Now at <> we prefer "doSomething()" over "DoSomething()". All else
being equally, you normally want private objects over public objects
when the private objects are available.
The same logic is applied to deep completions so we prefer "c.foo.bar"
over "c.Foo().bar".
Change-Id: Ic91cba7721ddb1f2a30338037693ddcce8c621f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223877
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change fixes breadcrumbs when the cursor is inside of a method by making the method a top level symbol and removing it from the struct's hierarchy.
Fixesgolang/go#36949
Change-Id: I8da5f453a5c78ade1e7688fc4eeebf79ce96f1e1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221819
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds support for recognizing a //go:generate directive
and offering a CodeLens that will then send a "generate" command to
the server to run "go generate" or "go generate ./...". Because
"go generate" can only be executed per package, there is no need to show
the CodeLens on top of every //go:generate comment. Therefore, only the
top directive will be considered.
The stdout/stderr of the go generate command will be piped to the logger
while stderr will also be sent to the editor as a window/showMessage
The user will only know when the process starts and when it ends so that they wouldn't
get bogged with a large number of message windows popping up. However, they can
check the logs for all the details.
If a user wants to cancel the "go generate" command, they will be able
to do so with a "Cancel" ActionItem that the server will offer to the client
Fixesgolang/go#37680
Change-Id: I89a9617521eab20859cb2215db133f34fda856c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222247
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The tests will not run because there is no workspacesymbol marker.
Therefore, restore testdata used in WorkspaceSymbols tests, and
initialize data so that the tests run even if the target of the marker
is 0.
Change-Id: I051b842183b7e23bb746cc282fc3921a90ca8df1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221617
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Now we properly offer "case" and "default" keyword completion in cases
like:
switch {
<>
}
First I had to add an AST fix for empty switch statements to move the
closing brace down. For example, say the user is completing:
switch {
ca<>
}
This gets parsed as:
switch {
}
Even if we manually recover the "ca" token, "<>" is not positioned
inside the switch statement anymore, so we don't know to offer "case"
and "default" candidates. To work around this, we move the closing
brace down one line yielding:
switch {
}
Second I had to add logic to manually extract the completion prefix
inside empty switch statements, and finally some logic to offer (only)
"case" and "default" candidates in empty switch statements.
Updates golang/go#34009.
Change-Id: I624f17da1c5e73faf91fe5f69e872d86f1cf5482
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220579
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now we offer an error-check-and-return completion candidate when
appropriate:
func myFunc() (int, error) {
f, err := os.Open("foo")
<>
}
offers the candidate:
if err != nil {
return 0, <err>
}
where <> denotes a placeholder so you can easily alter "err".
The completion will only be offered when:
1. The position is in a function that returns an error as final result
value, and
2. The statement preceding position is an assignment whose final LHS
value is an error.
The completion will contain zero values for the non-error return values
as necessary.
Using the above example, the completion will be offered after the user
has typed:
i
if
if err
Basically the candidate will be offered after every keystroke as the
user types "if err".
I call this new type of completion a statement completion - perfect
for when you want to make a statement!
Change-Id: I0a330e1c1fa81a2757d3afc84c24e853f46f26b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221613
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Editors typically trigger completion automatically after ".". This
pops up annoying, useless completions after "..." variadic param, such
as "foo(bar...<>)". We now suppress completions in or directly after
the ellipsis.
Fixesgolang/go#37358.
Change-Id: I9fc94fbdf69429bd787bcb2c643f4f730e24154d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222200
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We now offer "range" keyword in the for loop init statement:
for i := r<> // offer "range" completion candidate
Updates golang/go#34009.
Change-Id: I2e4c1db11c37127406c78191681c39b9dd3439f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220504
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Offer "struct", "interface", "map", "chan", and "func" keywords when
we expect a type. For example "var foo i<>" will offer "interface".
Because "struct" and "interface" are more often used when declaring
named types, they get a higher score in type declarations. Otherwise,
"map", "chan" and "func" get a higher score.
I also got rid of the special keyword scoring. Now keywords just use
stdScore and highScore. This makes the interplay with other types of
candidates more predictable. Keywords are offered in pretty limited
contexts, so I don't think they will be annoying.
Finally, keyword candidate score is now to be scaled properly based on
how well they match the prefix. Previously they weren't penalized for
not matching well, so there were probably some situations where
keywords were ranked too high.
Updates golang/go#34009.
Change-Id: I0b659c00a8503cd72da28853dfe54fcb67f734ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220503
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds support for passing a span to cmd/suggested_fix.go, originally it would just take the filename and apply all the fixes for that file. Now, it can also take just a span within that file and only apply the fixes relevant to that span.
The //@suggestedfix marker now contains an extra parameter to specify which type of codeaction is expected.
Change-Id: I4e94b8dad719f990dc2d0ef3c50816f70f59f737
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222137
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adjusts where the start and end of the arguments list are when determining which parameter is the active paramter. Rather than use the first and last argument's position, we will use the start and ending parentheses.
Fixesgolang/go#37271
Change-Id: I70bc5c8b4bdb5242fc35a20e63b9a8860cb1d6bd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221817
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds an upgrade all dependencies codelens on the go.mod file if there are available upgrades.
Updates golang/go#36501
Change-Id: I86c1ae7e7a6dc01b7f5cd7eb18e5a11d96a3acc1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221108
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We were panicking when a LHS assignee's type was nil, such as:
// "foo" has not been declared
foo = 123
A recent refactoring changed (*completer).typeMatches() to no longer
gracefully handle a nil types.Type for its first parameter. That
behavior seems fine, so fix the problematic caller of typeMatches to
check for nil before calling.
Change-Id: Ie11e4a2d374ab1efbf6fd13fbe214e06d359fca0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221020
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Now "implementations" supports finding interfaces implemented by the
specified concrete type. This is the inverse of what "implementations"
normally does. There isn't currently a better place in LSP to put this
functionality. The reverse lookup isn't an important feature for most
languages because types often must explicitly declare what interfaces
they implement.
An argument can be made that this functionality fits better into find-
references, but it is still a stretch. Plus, that would require
find-references to search all packages instead of just transitive
dependents.
Updates golang/go#35550.
Change-Id: I72dc78ef52b5bf501da2f39692e99cd304b5406e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/219678
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The highlight tests imported golang.org/x/tools/internal/lsp/protocol
package, which doesn't exist when the testdata is set up in the test
harness. This causes gopls to try to reload the metadata for the
package. I'm not sure why this wasn't an issue before, since we should
re-run go/packages.Load every time we have missing dependencies.
Fixesgolang/go#37365
Change-Id: I8ebcbbf78b7e6fcdac9ab83bef3f5a0c9a50a361
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221107
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
This change implements support for textDocument/documentLink when it comes to go.mod files.
Updates golang/go#36501
Change-Id: Ic0974e3e858dd1c8df54b7d7abee085bbcb6d4ee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/219938
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Searching with an empty string shouldn't return every symbol in the
workspace -- nobody wants that. Limit to 100 results to avoid breaking
editors. (VS Code locks up for like 30 seconds on my workspace.)
Change-Id: I1e0be476e8eeaef9e69767bfa04a89d40bd3a6e5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220939
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
I'm still not sure if we need to handle any other non-standard package
path apart from "command-line-arguments".
Also, a couple of staticcheck fixes.
Change-Id: I0bb3e60f6ffe104ff9027dbebb628020caaa1af4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220138
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
The code to check if a candidate object matches our candidate
inference had become complicated, messy, and in some cases incorrect.
The main source of the complexity is the "derived" expected and
candidate types. When considering a candidate object "foo", we also
consider "&foo", "foo()", and "*foo", as appropriate. On the expected
side of things, when completing the a variadic function parameter we
expect either the variadic slice type and the scalar element type.
The code had grown organically to handle the expanding concerns, but
that resulted in confused code that didn't handle the interplay
between the various facets of candidate inference.
For example, we were inappropriately invoking func candidates when
completing variadic args:
func foo(...func())
func bar() {}
foo(bar<>) // oops - expanded to "bar()"
and we weren't type matching functions properly as builtin args:
func myMap() map[string]int { ... }
delete(myM<>) // we weren't preferring (or invoking) "myMap()"
We also had methods like "typeMatches" which took both a "candidate"
object and a "candType" type, which doesn't make sense because the
candidate contains the type already.
Now instead we explicitly iterate over all the derived candidate and
expected types so they are treated the same. There are still some
warts left but I think this is a step in the right direction.
Change-Id: If84a84b34a8fb771a32231f7ab64ca192f611b3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218877
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
