For #55326
Change-Id: I3d0ff7f820f7b2009d1b226abf701b2337fe8cbc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/432635
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: xie cui <523516579@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
When being used by the compiler, fix up types2 error messages to be more
like Go 1.17 compiler errors. In particular:
- add information about which method is missing when a type is not
assignable/convertible/etc. to an interface.
- add information about any existing method which has the same name,
but wrong type.
- add extra hint in the case that the source or destination type is a
pointer to an interface, rather than an interface.
- add extra hint "need type assertion" in the case that the source is
an interface that is implemented by the destination.
- the following change in the CL stack also adds information about any
existing method with a different name that only differs in case.
Include much of the new logic in a new common function
(*Checker).missingMethodReason().
types2 still adds a little more information in some cases then the Go
1.17 compiler. For example, it typically says "(value of type T)",
rather than "(type T)", where "value" could also be "constant",
"variable", etc.
I kept the types2 error messages almost all the same when types2 is not
used by the compiler. The only change (to reduce amount of compatibility
code) was to change "M method" phrasing in one case to "method M"
phrasing in one error message (which is the phrasing it uses in all
other cases). That is the reason that there are a few small changes in
types2/testdata/check/*.src.
Added new test test/fixedbugs/issue48471.go to test that the added
information is appearing correctly.
Also adjusted the pattern matching in a bunch of other
test/fixedbugs/*.go, now that types2 is producing error messages closer
to Go 1.17. Was able to remove a couple test files from the types2
exception list in run.go.
Updated #48471
Change-Id: I8af1eae6eb8a5541d8ea20b66f494e2e795e1956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/363436
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The following files had merge conflicts and were merged manually:
src/cmd/compile/fmtmap_test.go
src/cmd/compile/internal/gc/noder.go
src/go/parser/error_test.go
test/assign.go
test/chan/perm.go
test/fixedbugs/issue22822.go
test/fixedbugs/issue4458.go
test/init.go
test/interface/explicit.go
test/map1.go
test/method2.go
The following files had manual changes to make tests pass:
test/run.go
test/used.go
src/cmd/compile/internal/types2/stdlib_test.go
Change-Id: Ia495aaaa80ce321ee4ec2a9105780fbe913dbd4c
If an interface contains a blank method, that's already an error. No
need for useless follow-up error messages about not implementing them.
Fixes#42964.
Change-Id: I5bf53a8f27d75d4c86c61588c5e2e3e95563d320
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/275294
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
With this CL, the first ~500 errorcheck tests pass when running
go run run.go -v -G
in the $GOROOT/test directory (the log output includes a few dozen
tests that are currently skipped).
Change-Id: I9eaa2319fb39a090df54f8699ddc29ffe58b1bf1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/274975
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
These changes match the following gofrontend error messages:
blank1.go:16:1: error: may not define methods on non-local type
chan/perm.go:28:9: error: expected channel
chan/perm.go:29:11: error: left operand of ‘<-’ must be channel
chan/perm.go:69:9: error: argument must be channel
complit1.go:25:16: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:26:16: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:27:17: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:49:41: error: may only omit types within composite literals of slice, array, or map type
complit1.go:50:14: error: expected struct, slice, array, or map type for composite literal
convlit.go:24:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type string)
convlit.go:25:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type float64)
convlit.go:26:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type int)
ddd1.go:63:9: error: invalid use of ‘...’ calling non-variadic function
fixedbugs/bug176.go:12:18: error: index expression is not integer constant
fixedbugs/bug332.go:17:10: error: use of undefined type ‘T’
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:22:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:33:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:44:25: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:55:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4458.go:19:14: error: type has no method ‘foo’
fixedbugs/issue5172.go:24:14: error: too many expressions for struct
init.go:17:9: error: reference to undefined name ‘runtime’
initializerr.go:26:29: error: duplicate value for index 1
interface/explicit.go:60:14: error: type assertion only valid for interface types
label.go:64:9: error: reference to undefined label ‘go2’
label1.go:18:97: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:22:97: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:106:89: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:108:26: error: invalid continue label ‘on’
label1.go:111:118: error: break statement not within for or switch or select
label1.go:113:23: error: invalid break label ‘dance’
map1.go:64:9: error: not enough arguments
map1.go:65:9: error: not enough arguments
map1.go:67:9: error: argument 1 must be a map
method2.go:36:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
method2.go:37:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
method2.go:41:12: error: method requires pointer (use ‘(*T).g’)
syntax/chan1.go:13:19: error: send statement used as value; use select for non-blocking send
syntax/chan1.go:17:11: error: send statement used as value; use select for non-blocking send
Change-Id: I98047b60a376e3d2788836300f7fcac3f2c285cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/273527
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This change adds line position tests for several yyerror calls in the
typechecker that are currently not tested in any way.
Untested yyerror calls were found by replacing them with
yerrorl(src.NoXPos, ...)
(thus destroying position information in the error), and then running
the test suite. No failures means no test coverage for the relevant
yyerror call.
For #19683
Change-Id: Iedb3d2f02141b332e9bfa76dbf5ae930ad2fddc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41477
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Accomplished by synchronizing the formatting of conversion errors between typecheck.c and subr.c
Fixes#3984.
R=golang-dev, remyoudompheng, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6500064
// ERROR "pattern1" "pattern2"
means that there has to be one or more
lines matching pattern1 and then excluding
those, there have to be one or more lines
matching pattern2. So if you expect two
different error messages from a particular
line, writing two separate patterns checks
that both errors are produced.
Also, errchk now flags lines that produce
more errors than expected. Before, as long as
at least one error matched the pattern, all the
others were ignored.
Revise tests to expect or silence these
additional errors.
R=lvd, r, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4869044
explicit.go:36:4: error: incompatible types in assignment (need explicit conversion)
explicit.go:41:4: error: incompatible types in assignment (type has no methods)
explicit.go:42:4: error: incompatible types in assignment (need explicit conversion)
explicit.go:45:5: error: incompatible types in assignment (need explicit conversion; missing method ‘N’)
explicit.go:48:9: error: invalid type conversion (need explicit conversion; missing method ‘N’)
explicit.go:51:4: error: incompatible types in assignment
explicit.go:51:7: error: invalid type conversion (need explicit conversion)
explicit.go:57:10: error: impossible type assertion: type does not implement interface (type has no methods)
explicit.go:62:10: error: impossible type assertion: type does not implement interface (incompatible type for method ‘M’ (different number of parameters))
explicit.go:67:5: error: incompatible type in initialization (type has no methods)
explicit.go:68:5: error: incompatible type in initialization (incompatible type for method ‘M’ (different number of parameters))
explicit.go:70:11: error: invalid type conversion (type has no methods)
explicit.go:71:11: error: invalid type conversion (incompatible type for method ‘M’ (different number of parameters))
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/2139044
* Code for assignment, conversions now mirrors spec.
* Changed some snprint -> smprint.
* Renamed runtime functions to separate
interface conversions from type assertions:
convT2I, assertI2T, etc.
* Correct checking of \U sequences.
Fixes#840.
Fixes#830.
Fixes#778.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/1303042
