to map element keys
Composite literals containing element values that are themselves composite
literals may leave away the element's literal types if they are identical
to the enclosing composite literal's element type.
(http://golang.org/ref/spec#Composite_literals)
When we made this change, we forgot to apply the analogous rule to map
literal keys. This change generalizes that rule. Added more examples,
including one showing the recursive application of the elision rules.
This is a fully backward-compatible language change. It was discussed
some time back.
Fixes#8589.
To be submitted once all compilers accept the extension.
Change-Id: I4d45b64b5970f0d5501572945d5a097e64a9458b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2591
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
While we're here, also fix two HTML issues.
Fixes#9235.
Change-Id: I6e2f50931c0f387881271484a726ac2308518cf4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/7602
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
When printing the type of the function there was no newline printed in
case of unexpected type.
Change-Id: I5946413f0864f712a1b955f488b436793018e0e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/7480
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
- Fixed term in preceding section: submitted -> merged.
- Clear transitions between web sites.
- Clarify "types" of G Accounts.
- Less verbose "Configure Git" instructions. [l10n]
- Google uses the term "sign in".
- Mention .gitcookie file created.
Update "Register with Gerrit".
- Link directly to gerrit /login/ .
HTML
- Removed non-ascii "hidden characters".
- Encoded some & and >.
Change-Id: I0d99102def6b32e09b8e42fa40e20227ad5e7568
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/5892
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
- added a new field ast.EmptyStmt.Implicit to indicate explicit
or implicit semicolon
- fix ast.EmptyStmt.End() accordingly
- adjusted parser and added test case
Fixes#9979.
Change-Id: I72b0983b3a0cabea085598e1bf6c8df629776b57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/5720
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
e.g. ·Name instead of package·Name for automatic stack map to
be applied from its Go prototype.
The underlying reason is that liblink look up name with suffix
".args_stackmap" for the stackmap coming from its Go prototype,
but all the Go functions are named "".Name as this stage. Thus
an assembly function named package·Name will never find its
stackmap, which is named "".package.Name.args_stackmap.
Perhaps cmd/vet should give a warning for this.
Change-Id: I10d154a73ec969d574d20af877f747424350fbd1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2588
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Only documentation / comment changes. Update references to
point to golang.org permalinks or go.googlesource.com/go.
References in historical release notes under doc are left as is.
Change-Id: Icfc14e4998723e2c2d48f9877a91c5abef6794ea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4060
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fixes#9756.
Change-Id: If4ee6fe10f8f90294ff9c5e7480371494094b111
Signed-off-by: Shenghou Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3740
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
These are no longer used by anything.
Change-Id: I50c971418b07cafc983242833a196ba2028a2723
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3603
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
This manually reverts 555da73 from #6372 which implies a
minimum FreeBSD version of 8-STABLE.
Updates docs to mention new minimum requirement.
Fixes#9627
Change-Id: I40ae64be3682d79dd55024e32581e3e5e2be8aa7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3020
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The existing go code document did not link to the GOPATH documentation.
This will link to it, in hopes of making it more discoverable.
Change-Id: Ie4ded2fdce08f412e4acbcc93acdd76f5791b84a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2265
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Mostly I need to tickle the builders, since I'm working on the
dashboard builders right now.
Change-Id: I833fc22bc942758a58791ed038634cdd812f5411
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2261
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Vitess and protobuf has moved to GitHub; update the links.
Change-Id: I2d90bde1a7f2b590c8b7b08ce73d6faa13b51da0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2166
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
These are the references that affect current Go users.
I left intact references in older release notes;
we can figure out what to do with them later.
LGTM=rsc
R=rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/186140043
Conflicts:
doc/go1.4.html
Change-Id: I1032686f2b3ac6dacaf8f114b8c35cdf221330ca
Language clarification.
The existing rules for selector expressions imply
automatic dereferencing of pointers to struct fields.
They also implied automatic dereferencing of selectors
denoting methods. In almost all cases, such automatic
dereferencing does indeed take place for methods but the
reason is not the selector rules but the fact that method
sets include both methods with T and *T receivers; so for
a *T actual receiver, a method expecting a formal T
receiver, also accepts a *T (and the invocation or method
value expression is the reason for the auto-derefering).
However, the rules as stated so far implied that even in
case of a variable p of named pointer type P, a selector
expression p.f would always be shorthand for (*p).f. This
is true for field selectors f, but cannot be true for
method selectors since a named pointer type always has an
empty method set.
Named pointer types may never appear as anonymous field
types (and method receivers, for that matter), so this
only applies to variables declared of a named pointer
type. This is exceedingly rare and perhaps shouldn't be
permitted in the first place (but we cannot change that).
Amended the selector rules to make auto-deref of values
of named pointer types an exception to the general rules
and added corresponding examples with explanations.
Both gc and gccgo have a bug where they do auto-deref
pointers of named types in method selectors where they
should not:
See http://play.golang.org/p/c6VhjcIVdM , line 45.
Fixes#5769.
Fixes#8989.
LGTM=r, rsc
R=r, rsc, iant, ken
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/168790043
People viewing this locally will not have a /s/ on their local godoc.
tip.golang.org doesn't have one either.
Also change all golang.org links to https, to avoid mixed content
warnings when viewing https://golang.org/.
Fixes#9028.
LGTM=bradfitz, r
R=r, bradfitz
CC=adg, golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/168250043
Add a short introductory section saying what most Go
programmers really need to know, which is that you
shouldn't have to read this document to understand
the behavior of your program.
LGTM=bradfitz, adg, tracey.brendan, iant, rsc, dsymonds
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz, tracey.brendan, adg, iant, rsc, dsymonds
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/158500043
Not a language change.
This is simply documenting the status quo which permits
builtin function names to be parenthesized in calls; e.g.,
both
len(s)
and
(((len)))(s)
are accepted by all compilers and go/types.
Changed the grammar by merging the details of BuiltinCall
with ordinary Calls. Also renamed the Call production to
Arguments which more clearly identifies that part of the
grammar and also matches better with its counterpart on
the declaration side (Parameters).
The fact that the first argument can be a type (for builtins)
or cannot be a type (for regular function calls) is expressed
in the prose, no need to make the grammar more complicated.
Fixes#9001.
LGTM=iant, r, rsc
R=r, rsc, iant, ken, dave
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/160570043
Move the release notes into an HTML file.
Start writing the text.
LGTM=rsc
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz, kamil.kisiel, tracey.brendan, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/161350043
Wrong article, one stylistic point that bothers someone (but not me).
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/156680043
The compatibility guideline needs to be clear about this even
though it means adding a clause that was not there from the
beginning. It has always been understood, so this isn't really
a change in policy, just in its expression.
LGTM=bradfitz, gri, rsc
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz, gri, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/162060043
