I broke the rule: never click the Submit button on the web.
Change-Id: If81a5cc31c1f28664960bad124cc596f5cab1222
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18203
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
These find approximately nothing.
Takes 5% off my all.bash run time.
For #10571.
Change-Id: I21d3a844af756eb37f59bba0064f24995626da0d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18198
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Takes 15% off my all.bash run time
(after this and earlier CLs, now down to 3½ from 5½ minutes).
For #10571.
Change-Id: Iac316ffb730c9ff0a0faa7cc3b82ed4f7e6d4361
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18088
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Mostly we just care that the test binaries link and start up.
No need to run the full test suites.
Takes 12% off my all.bash run time.
For #10571.
Change-Id: I01af618f3d51deb841ea638424e1389a2df7d746
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18086
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Takes 3% off my all.bash run time.
For #10571.
Change-Id: I8f00f523d6919e87182d35722a669b0b96b8218b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18087
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
I'm tired of having to remember it on every command.
Rebuilding everything is the wrong default.
This CL updates the build script, but the builders may
(or may not) need work, depending on whether they
rebuild using the test command (I doubt it).
Change-Id: I21f202a2f13e73df3f6bd54ae6a317c467b68151
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18084
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Currently goroutineheader goes through some convolutions to *almost*
print the scan state of a G. However, the code path that would print
the scan state of the G refers to gStatusStrings where it almost
certainly meant to refer to gScanStatusStrings (which is unused), so
it winds up printing the regular status string without the scan state
either way. Furthermore, if the G is in _Gwaiting, we override the
status string and lose where this would indicate the scan state if it
worked.
This commit fixes this so the runtime prints the scan state. However,
rather than using a parallel list of status strings, this simply adds
a conditional print if the scan bit is set. This lets us remove the
string list, prints the scan state even in _Gwaiting, and lets us
strip off the scan bit at the beginning of the function, which
simplifies the rest of it.
Change-Id: Ic0adbe5c05abf4adda93da59f93b578172b28e3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18092
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
If non-Go code calls sigaltstack before a signal is received, use
sigaltstack to determine the current signal stack and set the gsignal
stack to use it. This makes the Go runtime more robust in the face of
non-Go code. We still can't handle a disabled signal stack or a signal
triggered with SA_ONSTACK clear, but we now give clear errors for those
cases.
Fixes#7227.
Update #9896.
Change-Id: Icb1607e01fd6461019b6d77d940e59b3aed4d258
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18102
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com>
This makes NYCbCrA consistent with YCbCr.
Fixes#13706.
Change-Id: Ifced84372e4865925fa6efef9ca2f1de43da70e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18115
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
s/encrypt/decrypt/
The text is unsafe to cut and paste...
Change-Id: Iab19ddf8182d087e9a4b4d34a9eeabd1d2aa02d6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18104
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Give a link to the wikipedia page describing the mechanism and
explain better how to use the same buffer for input and output.
Change-Id: If6dfd6cf9c6dff0517cb715f60a11349dbdd91e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18103
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This change replaces the existing log format separated by commas and
spaces with space-separated one.
Change-Id: I9a4b38669025430190c9a1a6b5c82b862866559d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17999
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reorder how register & stack allocation is done. We used to allocate
registers, then fix up merge edges, then allocate stack slots. This
lead to lots of unnecessary copies on merge edges:
v2 = LoadReg v1
v3 = StoreReg v2
If v1 and v3 are allocated to the same stack slot, then this code is
unnecessary. But at regalloc time we didn't know the homes of v1 and
v3.
To fix this problem, allocate all the stack slots before fixing up the
merge edges. That way, we know what stack slots values use so we know
what copies are required.
Use a good technique for shuffling values around on merge edges.
Improves performance of the go1 TimeParse benchmark by ~12%
Change-Id: I731f43e4ff1a7e0dc4cd4aa428fcdb97812b86fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17915
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
In general the package net deals IPv4 addresses as IPv6 IPv4-mapped
addresses internally for the dual stack era, when we need to support
various techniques on IPv4/IPv6 translation.
This change makes windows implementation follow the same pattern which
BSD variants and Linux do.
Updates #13544.
Also fixes an unintentionally formatted line by accident by gofmt.
Change-Id: I4953796e751fd8050c73094468a0d7b0d33f5516
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17992
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Only install signal handlers for synchronous signals that become
run-time panics. Set the SA_ONSTACK flag for other signal handlers as
needed.
Fixes#13028.
Update #12465.
Update #13034.
Update #13042.
Change-Id: I28375e70641f60630e10f3c86e24b6e4f8a35cc9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17903
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
It turns out that the second argument for sigaction on Darwin has a
different type than the first argument. The second argument is the user
visible sigaction struct, and does not have the sa_tramp field.
I base this on
http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/Libc/Libc-1081.1.3/sys/sigaction.c
not to mention actual testing.
While I was at it I removed a useless memclr in setsig, a relic of the C
code.
This CL is Darwin-specific changes. The tests for this CL are in
https://golang.org/cl/17903 .
Change-Id: I61fe305c72311df6a589b49ad7b6e49b6960ca24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18015
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Programs that call panic to crash after detecting a serious problem
may wish to use SetTraceback to force printing of all goroutines first.
Change-Id: Ib23ad9336f405485aabb642ca73f454a14c8baf3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18043
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This future-proofs the Chdr64 structure against later versions of ELF
defining this field and declutters the documentation without changing
the layout of the struct.
This structure does not exist in the current release, so this change
is safe.
Change-Id: I239aad7243ddaf063a1f8cd521d8a50b30413281
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18028
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Copy the same sentence from Transport.TLSNextProto.
Change-Id: Ib67bf054e891a68be8ba466a8c52968363374d16
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18031
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently, if sigprof determines that the G is in user code (not cgo
or libcall code), it will only traceback the G stack if it can acquire
the stack barrier lock. However, it has no such restriction if the G
is in cgo or libcall code. Because cgo calls count as syscalls, stack
scanning and stack barrier installation can occur during a cgo call,
which means sigprof could attempt to traceback a G in a cgo call while
scanstack is installing stack barriers in that G's stack. As a result,
the following sequence of events can cause the sigprof traceback to
panic with "missed stack barrier":
1. M1: G1 performs a Cgo call (which, on Windows, is any system call,
which could explain why this is easier to reproduce on Windows).
2. M1: The Cgo call puts G1 into _Gsyscall state.
3. M2: GC starts a scan of G1's stack. It puts G1 in to _Gscansyscall
and acquires the stack barrier lock.
4. M3: A profiling signal comes in. On Windows this is a global
(though I don't think this matters), so the runtime stops M1 and
calls sigprof for G1.
5. M3: sigprof fails to acquire the stack barrier lock (because the
GC's stack scan holds it).
6. M3: sigprof observes that G1 is in a Cgo call, so it calls
gentraceback on G1 with its Cgo transition point.
7. M3: gentraceback on G1 grabs the currently empty g.stkbar slice.
8. M2: GC finishes scanning G1's stack and installing stack barriers.
9. M3: gentraceback encounters one of the just-installed stack
barriers and panics.
This commit fixes this by only allowing cgo tracebacks if sigprof can
acquire the stack barrier lock, just like in the regular user
traceback case.
For good measure, we put the same constraint on libcall tracebacks.
This case is probably already safe because, unlike cgo calls, libcalls
leave the G in _Grunning and prevent reaching a safe point, so
scanstack cannot run during a libcall. However, this also means that
sigprof will always acquire the stack barrier lock without contention,
so there's no cost to adding this constraint to libcall tracebacks.
Fixes#12528. For 1.5.3 (will require some backporting).
Change-Id: Ia5a4b8e3d66b23b02ffcd54c6315c81055c0cec2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18023
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently, setNextBarrierPC manipulates the stack barriers without
acquiring the stack barrier lock. This is mostly okay because
setNextBarrierPC also runs synchronously on the G and prevents safe
points, but this doesn't prevent a sigprof from occurring during a
setNextBarrierPC and performing a traceback.
Given that setNextBarrierPC simply sets one entry in the stack barrier
array, this is almost certainly safe in reality. However, given that
this depends on a subtle argument, which may not hold in the future,
and that setNextBarrierPC almost never happens, making it nowhere near
performance-critical, we can simply acquire the stack barrier lock and
be sure that the synchronization will work.
Updates #12528. For 1.5.3.
Change-Id: Ife696e10d969f190157eb1cbe762a2de2ebce079
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18022
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
We used to compile everything with SSA and then decide whether
to use the result or not. It was useful when we were working
on coverage without much regard for correctness, but not so much now.
Instead, let's decide what we're going to compile and go through
the SSA compiler for only those functions.
TODO: next CL: get rid of all the UnimplementedF stuff.
Change-Id: If629addd8b62cd38ef553fd5d835114137885ce0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17763
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Update docs on ResponseWriter and Handler around concurrency.
Also add a test.
The Handler docs were old and used "object" a lot. It was also too
ServeMux-centric.
Fixes#13050
Updates #13659 (new issue found in http2 while writing the test)
Change-Id: I25f53d5fa54f1c9d579d3d0f191bf3d94b1a251b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17982
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
