This CL removes the special syntax for method receivers and
makes it just like other parameters. Instead, the crucial
receiver-specific rules (exactly one receiver, receiver type
must be of the form T or *T) are specified verbally instead
of syntactically.
This is a fully backward-compatible (and minor) syntax
relaxation. As a result, the following syntactic restrictions
(which are completely irrelevant) and which were only in place
for receivers are removed:
a) receiver types cannot be parenthesized
b) receiver parameter lists cannot have a trailing comma
The result of this CL is a simplication of the spec and the
implementation, with no impact on existing (or future) code.
Noteworthy:
- gc already permits a trailing comma at the end of a receiver
declaration:
func (recv T,) m() {}
This is technically a bug with the current spec; this CL will
legalize this notation.
- gccgo produces a misleading error when a trailing comma is used:
error: method has multiple receivers
(even though there's only one receiver)
- Compilers and type-checkers won't need to report errors anymore
if receiver types are parenthesized.
Fixes#4496.
LGTM=iant, rsc
R=r, rsc, iant, ken
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/101500044
Even if we can't run them, we should at least check that they compile.
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/107320046
This CL re-applies the tests added in CL 101330053 and subsequently rolled back in CL 102610043.
The original author of this change was Rui Ueyama <ruiu@google.com>
LGTM=r, ruiu
R=ruiu, r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/109170043
The number of estimated iterations required to reach the benchtime is multiplied by a safety margin (to avoid falling just short) and then rounded up to a readable number. With an accurate estimate, in the worse case, the resulting number of iterations could be 3.75x more than necessary: 1.5x for safety * 2.5x to round up (e.g. from 2eX+1 to 5eX).
This CL reduces the safety margin to 1.2x. Experimentation showed a diminishing margin of return past 1.2x, although the average case continued to show improvements down to 1.05x.
This CL also reduces the maximum round-up multiplier from 2.5x (from 2eX+1 to 5eX) to 2x, by allowing the number of iterations to be of the form 3eX.
Both changes improve benchmark wall clock times, and the effects are cumulative.
From 1.5x to 1.2x safety margin:
package old s new s delta
bytes 163 125 -23%
encoding/json 27 21 -22%
net/http 42 36 -14%
runtime 463 418 -10%
strings 82 65 -21%
Allowing 3eX iterations:
package old s new s delta
bytes 163 134 -18%
encoding/json 27 23 -15%
net/http 42 36 -14%
runtime 463 422 -9%
strings 82 72 -12%
Combined:
package old s new s delta
bytes 163 112 -31%
encoding/json 27 20 -26%
net/http 42 30 -29%
runtime 463 346 -25%
strings 82 60 -27%
LGTM=crawshaw, r, rsc
R=golang-codereviews, crawshaw, r, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/105990045
The previous call to parseRange already checks whether
all the ranges start before the end of file.
LGTM=robert.hencke, bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, robert.hencke, gobot, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/91880044
Update #1435
This proposal disables Setuid and Setgid on all linux platforms.
Issue 1435 has been open for a long time, and it is unlikely to be addressed soon so an argument was made by a commenter
https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=1435#c45
That these functions should made to fail rather than succeed in their broken state.
LGTM=ruiu, iant
R=iant, ruiu
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/106170043
MOV with SSE registers seems faster than REP MOVSQ if the
size being copied is less than about 2K. Previously we
didn't use MOV if the memory region is larger than 256
byte. This patch improves the performance of 257 ~ 2048
byte non-overlapping copy by using MOV.
Here is the benchmark result on Intel Xeon 3.5GHz (Nehalem).
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkMemmove16 4 4 +0.42%
BenchmarkMemmove32 5 5 -0.20%
BenchmarkMemmove64 6 6 -0.81%
BenchmarkMemmove128 7 7 -0.82%
BenchmarkMemmove256 10 10 +1.92%
BenchmarkMemmove512 29 16 -44.90%
BenchmarkMemmove1024 37 25 -31.55%
BenchmarkMemmove2048 55 44 -19.46%
BenchmarkMemmove4096 92 91 -0.76%
benchmark old MB/s new MB/s speedup
BenchmarkMemmove16 3370.61 3356.88 1.00x
BenchmarkMemmove32 6368.68 6386.99 1.00x
BenchmarkMemmove64 10367.37 10462.62 1.01x
BenchmarkMemmove128 17551.16 17713.48 1.01x
BenchmarkMemmove256 24692.81 24142.99 0.98x
BenchmarkMemmove512 17428.70 31687.72 1.82x
BenchmarkMemmove1024 27401.82 40009.45 1.46x
BenchmarkMemmove2048 36884.86 45766.98 1.24x
BenchmarkMemmove4096 44295.91 44627.86 1.01x
LGTM=khr
R=golang-codereviews, gobot, khr
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/90500043
sync.Pool is not supposed to be used everywhere, but is
a last resort.
««« original CL description
strings: use sync.Pool to cache buffer
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkByteReplacerWriteString 3596 3094 -13.96%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkByteReplacerWriteString 1 0 -100.00%
LGTM=dvyukov
R=bradfitz, dave, dvyukov
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/101330053
»»»
LGTM=dave
R=r, dave
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/102610043
Fixes#8074.
The issue was not reproduceable by revision
go version devel +e0ad7e329637 Thu Jun 19 22:19:56 2014 -0700 linux/arm
But include the original test case in case the issue reopens itself.
LGTM=dvyukov
R=golang-codereviews, dvyukov
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/107290043
This requires minimal changes to the runtime hooks. In particular,
synchronization events must be done only on valid addresses now,
so I've added the additional checks to race.c.
LGTM=iant
R=iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/101000046
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkByteReplacerWriteString 7359 3661 -50.25%
LGTM=dave
R=golang-codereviews, dave
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/102550043
Afterprologue check was required when did not know
about return arguments of functions and/or they were not zeroed.
Now 100% precision is required for stacks due to stack copying,
so it must work w/o afterprologue one way or another.
I can limit this change for 1.3 to merely adding a TODO,
but this check is super confusing so I don't want this knowledge to get lost.
LGTM=rsc
R=golang-codereviews, gobot, rsc, khr
CC=golang-codereviews, khr, rsc
https://golang.org/cl/96580045
Use WriteString instead of allocating a byte slice as a
buffer. This was a TODO.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkWriteString 40139 19991 -50.20%
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/107190044
requires a decoder to do its own byte buffering instead of using
bufio.Reader, due to byte stuffing.
benchmark old MB/s new MB/s speedup
BenchmarkDecodeBaseline 33.40 50.65 1.52x
BenchmarkDecodeProgressive 24.34 31.92 1.31x
On 6g, unsafe.Sizeof(huffman{}) falls from 4872 to 964 bytes, and
the decoder struct contains 8 of those.
LGTM=r
R=r, nightlyone
CC=bradfitz, couchmoney, golang-codereviews, raph
https://golang.org/cl/109050045
This is a clone of 101370043, which I accidentally applied to the
release branch first.
No big deal, it needed to be applied there anyway.
LGTM=r
R=r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/108090043
Storing temporary values to a slice is slower than storing
them to local variables of type byte.
benchmark old MB/s new MB/s speedup
BenchmarkEncodeToStringBase32 102.21 156.66 1.53x
BenchmarkEncodeToStringBase64 124.25 177.91 1.43x
LGTM=crawshaw
R=golang-codereviews, crawshaw, bradfitz, dave
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/109820045
Just to be more thorough.
No need to push this to 1.3; it's just a test change that
worked without any changes to the code being tested.
LGTM=crawshaw
R=golang-codereviews, crawshaw
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/109080045
genericReplacer.lookup is called for each byte of an input
string. In many (most?) cases, lookup will fail for the first
byte, and it will return immediately. Adding a fast path for
that case seems worth it.
Benchmark on my Xeon 3.5GHz Linux box:
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkGenericNoMatch 2691 774 -71.24%
BenchmarkGenericMatch1 7920 8151 +2.92%
BenchmarkGenericMatch2 52336 39927 -23.71%
BenchmarkSingleMaxSkipping 1575 1575 +0.00%
BenchmarkSingleLongSuffixFail 1429 1429 +0.00%
BenchmarkSingleMatch 56228 55444 -1.39%
BenchmarkByteByteNoMatch 568 568 +0.00%
BenchmarkByteByteMatch 977 972 -0.51%
BenchmarkByteStringMatch 1669 1687 +1.08%
BenchmarkHTMLEscapeNew 422 422 +0.00%
BenchmarkHTMLEscapeOld 692 670 -3.18%
BenchmarkByteByteReplaces 8492 8474 -0.21%
BenchmarkByteByteMap 2817 2808 -0.32%
LGTM=rsc
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz, dave, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/79200044
Bug was introduced recently. Add more tests, fix the bugs.
Suppress + sign when not required in zero padding.
Do not zero pad infinities.
All old tests still pass.
This time for sure!
Fixes#8217.
LGTM=rsc
R=golang-codereviews, dan.kortschak, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/103480043
