There is no top-level Values function.
Change-Id: I3ea2eea0b5f77f3e1a3f75d1a6472507ef2888bb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8196
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Generating array types like [4]int would fail even though the int type
is generatable. Allow generating values of array types when the inner
type is generatable.
Change-Id: I7d71b3c18edb3737e2fec1ddf5e36c9dc8401971
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3865
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
This was brought to my attention because a user thought that because
the file was named "example.go" it served as an example of good coding
practice. It's not an example, of course, but may as well use a more
idiomatic style anyhow.
Change-Id: I7aa720f603f09f7d597fb7536dbf46ef09144e28
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1902
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
There are 3 issues:
1. Skip argument of callers is off by 3,
so that all allocations are deep inside of memory profiler.
2. Memory profiling statistics are not updated after runtime.GC.
3. Testing package does not update memory profiling statistics
before capturing the profile.
Also add an end-to-end test.
Fixes#8867.
LGTM=rsc
R=rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/148710043
For -mode=atomic, we need to read the counters
using an atomic load to avoid a race. Not worth worrying
about when -mode=atomic is set during generation
of the profile, so we use atomic loads always.
Fixes#8630.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/141800043
