This is dead code. If you want to quiesce the system the
preferred way is to use forEachP(func(*p){}).
Change-Id: Ic7677a5dd55e3639b99e78ddeb2c71dd1dd091fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10267
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Makes little difference internally but makes go list output more useful.
Change-Id: I1fa1f839107de08818427382b2aef8dc4d765b36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10192
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
On Windows, we need to make sure that the node under test has external
connectivity.
Fixes#10795.
Change-Id: I99f2336180c7b56474fa90a4a6cdd5a6c4dd3805
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10006
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
On my systems, ld -rpath sets DT_RUNPATH instead of DT_RPATH.
Change-Id: I5047e795fb7ef9336f5fa13ba24bb6245c0b0582
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10260
Reviewed-by: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
386 is not affected because it doesn't use ginscmp.
Fixes#10843.
Change-Id: I1b3a133bd1e5fabc85236f15d060dbaa4c391cf3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10116
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
In css, js, and html, the replacement operations are implemented
by iterating on strings (rune by rune). The for/range
statement is used. The length of the rune is required
and added to the index to properly slice the string.
This is potentially wrong because there is a discrepancy between
the result of utf8.RuneLen and the increment of the index
(set by the for/range statement). For invalid strings,
utf8.RuneLen('\ufffd') == 3, while the index is incremented
only by 1 byte.
htmlReplacer triggers a panic at slicing time for some
invalid strings.
Use a more robust iteration mechanism based on
utf8.DecodeRuneInString, and make sure the same
pattern is used for all similar functions in this
package.
Fixes#10799
Change-Id: Ibad3857b2819435d9fa564f06fc2ca8774102841
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10105
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Commit 9c9e36b pushed these errors down to where the write barriers
are actually emitted, but forgot to remove the original error that was
being pushed down.
Change-Id: I751752a896e78fb9e63d69f88e7fb8d1ff5d344c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10264
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The existing implementation executes `gofmt` binary from PATH
environment variable on invocation `go fmt` command.
Relying on PATH might lead to confusions for users with several Go installations.
It's more appropriate to run `gofmt` from GOBIN (if defined) or GOROOT.
Fixes#10755
Change-Id: I56d42a747319c766f2911508fab3994c3a366d12
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9900
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Prior to this CL whenever the GC marking was enabled and
a P was looking for work we supplied a G to help
the GC do its marking tasks. Once this G finished all
the marking available it would release the P to find another
available G. In the case where there was no work the P would drop
into findrunnable which would execute the mark helper G which would
immediately return and the P would drop into findrunnable again repeating
the process. Since the P was always given a G to run it never blocks.
This CL first checks if the GC mark helper G has available work and if
not the P immediately falls through to its blocking logic.
Fixes#10901
Change-Id: I94ac9646866ba64b7892af358888bc9950de23b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10189
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Currently setGCPercent sets heapminimum to heapminimum*GOGC/100. The
real intent is to set heapminimum to a scaled multiple of a fixed
default heap minimum, not to scale heapminimum based on its current
value. This turns out to be okay because setGCPercent is only called
once and heapminimum is initially set to this default heap minimum.
However, the code as written is confusing, especially since
setGCPercent is otherwise written so it could be called again to
change GOGC. Fix this by introducing a defaultHeapMinimum constant and
using this instead of the current value of heapminimum to compute the
scaled heap minimum.
As part of this, this commit improves the documentation on
heapminimum.
Change-Id: I4eb82c73dc2eb44a6e5a17c780a747a2e73d7493
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10181
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
I think "the flag" was a typo, and the word "after" was repetitive.
Change-Id: I81c034ca11a3a778ff1eb4b3af5b96bc525ab985
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10195
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Rearrange Node fields to enable better struct packing.
This reduces readability in favor of shrinking
the size of Nodes.
This reduces the size of Node from 328 to 312.
This reduces the memory usage to compile the
rotate tests by about 4.4%.
No functional changes. Passes toolstash -cmp.
Updates #9933.
Change-Id: I2764c5847fb1635ddc898e2ee385d007d67f03c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10141
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Param will be converted from an anonymous to a
named field in a subsequent, automated CL.
Reduces Node size from 368 to 328.
Reduces inuse_space on the rotate tests by about 3%.
No functional changes. Passes toolstash -cmp.
Updates #9933.
Change-Id: I5867b00328abf17ee24aea6ca58876bae9d8bfed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10210
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Funcdepth was already int32. Make Escloopdepth
and Decldepth also int32 instead of int.
No functional changes for non-absurd code. Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: I47e145dd732b6a73cfcc6d45956df0dbccdcd999
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10129
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This is a duplicate of CL 9491.
That CL broke the build due to pprof shortcomings
and was reverted in CL 9565.
CL 9623 fixed pprof, so this can go in again.
Fixes#10659.
Change-Id: If470fc90b3db2ade1d161b4417abd2f5c6c330b8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10212
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Better layout.
Fixes#10859.
The issue suggests rearranging so the comment comes out
after the methods. I tried this and it looks good but it is less
useful, since the stuff you're probably looking for - the methods
- are scrolled away by the comment. The most important
information should be last because that leaves it on your
screen after the print if the output is long.
Change-Id: I560f992601ccbe2293c347fa1b1018a3f5346c82
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10160
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
And fix to work on filesystems with only 1s resolution.
Fixes#10724
Change-Id: Ia07463f090b4290fc27f5953fa94186463d7afc7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9768
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Modified esc.go to allow slice literals (before append)
to be non-escaping. Modified tests to account for changes
in escape behavior and to also test the two cases that
were previously not tested.
Also minor cleanups to debug-printing within esc.go
Allocation stats for running compiler
( cd src/html/template;
for i in {1..5} ; do
go tool 6g -memprofile=testzz.${i}.prof -memprofilerate=1 *.go ;
go tool pprof -alloc_objects -text testzz.${i}.prof ;
done ; )
before about 86k allocations
after about 83k allocations
Fixes#8972
Change-Id: Ib61dd70dc74adb40d6f6fdda6eaa4bf7d83481de
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10118
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently, forEachP reuses the stopwait and stopnote fields from
stopTheWorld to track how many Ps have not responded to the safe-point
request and to sleep until all Ps have responded.
It was assumed this was safe because both stopTheWorld and forEachP
must occur under the worlsema and hence stopwait and stopnote cannot
be used for both purposes simultaneously and callers could always
determine the appropriate use based on sched.gcwaiting (which is only
set by stopTheWorld). However, this is not the case, since it's
possible for there to be a window between when an M observes that
gcwaiting is set and when it checks stopwait during which stopwait
could have changed meanings. When this happens, the M decrements
stopwait and may wakeup stopnote, but does not otherwise participate
in the forEachP protocol. As a result, stopwait is decremented too
many times, so it may reach zero before all Ps have run the safe-point
function, causing forEachP to wake up early. It will then either
observe that some P has not run the safe-point function and panic with
"P did not run fn", or the remaining P (or Ps) will run the safe-point
function before it wakes up and it will observe that stopwait is
negative and panic with "not stopped".
Fix this problem by giving forEachP its own safePointWait and
safePointNote fields.
One known sequence of events that can cause this race is as
follows. It involves three actors:
G1 is running on M1 on P1. P1 has an empty run queue.
G2/M2 is in a blocked syscall and has lost its P. (The details of this
don't matter, it just needs to be in a position where it needs to grab
an idle P.)
GC just started on G3/M3/P3. (These aren't very involved, they just
have to be separate from the other G's, M's, and P's.)
1. GC calls stopTheWorld(), which sets sched.gcwaiting to 1.
Now G1/M1 begins to enter a syscall:
2. G1/M1 invokes reentersyscall, which sets the P1's status to
_Psyscall.
3. G1/M1's reentersyscall observes gcwaiting != 0 and calls
entersyscall_gcwait.
4. G1/M1's entersyscall_gcwait blocks acquiring sched.lock.
Back on GC:
5. stopTheWorld cas's P1's status to _Pgcstop, does other stuff, and
returns.
6. GC does stuff and then calls startTheWorld().
7. startTheWorld() calls procresize(), which sets P1's status to
_Pidle and puts P1 on the idle list.
Now G2/M2 returns from its syscall and takes over P1:
8. G2/M2 returns from its blocked syscall and gets P1 from the idle
list.
9. G2/M2 acquires P1, which sets P1's status to _Prunning.
10. G2/M2 starts a new syscall and invokes reentersyscall, which sets
P1's status to _Psyscall.
Back on G1/M1:
11. G1/M1 finally acquires sched.lock in entersyscall_gcwait.
At this point, G1/M1 still thinks it's running on P1. P1's status is
_Psyscall, which is consistent with what G1/M1 is doing, but it's
_Psyscall because *G2/M2* put it in to _Psyscall, not G1/M1. This is
basically an ABA race on P1's status.
Because forEachP currently shares stopwait with stopTheWorld. G1/M1's
entersyscall_gcwait observes the non-zero stopwait set by forEachP,
but mistakes it for a stopTheWorld. It cas's P1's status from
_Psyscall (set by G2/M2) to _Pgcstop and proceeds to decrement
stopwait one more time than forEachP was expecting.
Fixes#10618. (See the issue for details on why the above race is safe
when forEachP is not involved.)
Prior to this commit, the command
stress ./runtime.test -test.run TestFutexsleep\|TestGoroutineProfile
would reliably fail after a few hundred runs. With this commit, it
ran for over 2 million runs and never crashed.
Change-Id: I9a91ea20035b34b6e5f07ef135b144115f281f30
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10157
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently, startTheWorld releases worldsema before starting the
world. Since startTheWorld can change gomaxprocs after allowing Ps to
run, this means that gomaxprocs can change while another P holds
worldsema.
Unfortunately, the garbage collector and forEachP assume that holding
worldsema protects against changes in gomaxprocs (which it *almost*
does). In particular, this is causing somewhat frequent "P did not run
fn" crashes in forEachP in the runtime tests because gomaxprocs is
changing between the several loops that forEachP does over all the Ps.
Fix this by only releasing worldsema after the world is started.
This relates to issue #10618. forEachP still fails under stress
testing, but much less frequently.
Change-Id: I085d627b70cca9ebe9af28fe73b9872f1bb224ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10156
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently, startTheWorld clears preemptoff for the current M before
starting the world. A few callers increment m.locks around
startTheWorld, presumably to prevent preemption any time during
starting the world. This is almost certainly pointless (none of the
other callers do this), but there's no harm in making startTheWorld
keep preemption disabled until it's all done, which definitely lets us
drop these m.locks manipulations.
Change-Id: I8a93658abd0c72276c9bafa3d2c7848a65b4691a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10155
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
There are several steps to stopping and starting the world and
currently they're open-coded in several places. The garbage collector
is the only thing that needs to stop and start the world in a
non-trivial pattern. Replace all other uses with calls to higher-level
functions that implement the entire pattern necessary to stop and
start the world.
This is a pure refectoring and should not change any code semantics.
In the following commits, we'll make changes that are easier to do
with this abstraction in place.
This commit renames the old starttheworld to startTheWorldWithSema.
This is a slight misnomer right now because the callers release
worldsema just before calling this. However, a later commit will swap
these and I don't want to think of another name in the mean time.
Change-Id: I5dc97f87b44fb98963c49c777d7053653974c911
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10154
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
In order to avoid deadlocks, startGC avoids kicking off GC if locks
are held by the calling M. However, it currently fails to check
preemptoff, which is the other way to disable preemption.
Fix this by adding a check for preemptoff.
Change-Id: Ie1083166e5ba4af5c9d6c5a42efdfaaef41ca997
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10153
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
It is misleading when stack trace say:
signal arrived during cgo execution
but we are not in cgo call.
Change-Id: I627e2f2bdc7755074677f77f21befc070a101914
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9190
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
If make.bash fails, there is no point continuing any further.
Fixes#10880.
Change-Id: I350cc16999372422ad3d2e0327d52d467886a5b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10180
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Currently, runqsteal steals Gs from another P into an intermediate
buffer and then copies those Gs into the current P's run queue. This
intermediate buffer itself was moved from the stack to the P in commit
c4fe503 to eliminate the cost of zeroing it on every steal.
This commit follows up c4fe503 by stealing directly into the current
P's run queue, which eliminates the copy and the need for the
intermediate buffer. The update to the tail pointer is only committed
once the entire steal operation has succeeded, so the semantics of
stealing do not change.
Change-Id: Icdd7a0eb82668980bf42c0154b51eef6419fdd51
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9998
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes#9625.
Fixes#10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The Template objects are supposed to be goroutine-safe once they
have been parsed. This includes the text and html ones.
For html/template, the escape mechanism is triggered at execution
time. It may alter the internal structures of the template, so
a mutex protects them against concurrent accesses.
The text/template package is free of any synchronization primitive.
A race condition may occur when nested templates are escaped:
the escape algorithm alters the function maps of the associated
text templates, while a concurrent template execution may access
the function maps in read mode.
The less invasive fix I have found is to introduce a RWMutex in
text/template to protect the function maps. This is unfortunate
but it should be effective.
Fixes#9945
Change-Id: I1edb73c0ed0f1fcddd2f1516230b548b92ab1269
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10101
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
This allows the removal of a fudge in data.go.
We have to defer the calls to adddynlib on non-Darwin until after we have
decided whether we are externally or internally linking. The Macho/ELF
separation could do with some cleaning up, but: code freeze.
Fixing this once rather than per-arch is what inspired the previous CLs.
Change-Id: I0166f7078a045dc09827745479211247466c0c54
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10002
Run-TryBot: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The only essential difference is elf32 vs elf64, I assume the other differences
are bugs in one version or another...
Change-Id: Ie6ff33d5574a6592b543df9983eff8fdf88c97a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10001
Run-TryBot: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
They were all essentially the same.
Change-Id: I6e0b548cda6e4bbe2ec3b3025b746d1f6d332d48
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10000
Run-TryBot: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This is an automated follow-up to CL 10120.
It was generated with a combination of eg and gofmt -r.
No functional changes. Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: I0dc6d146372012b4cce9cc4064066daa6694eee6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10144
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The previous implementation spawned an extra goroutine to handle
rechecking resolv.conf for changes.
This change eliminates the extra goroutine, and has rechecking
done as part of a lookup. A side effect of this change is that the
first lookup after a resolv.conf change will now succeed, whereas
previously it would have failed. It also fixes rechecking logic to
ignore resolv.conf parsing errors as it should.
Fixes#8652Fixes#10576Fixes#10649Fixes#10650Fixes#10845
Change-Id: I502b587c445fa8eca5207ca4f2c8ec8c339fec7f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9991
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
