Add a new toplevel `inspect` verb to the gopls command, to expose the
internal state of a running gopls server. For now, this verb exposes a
single subcommand `sessions`, which lists some information about current
server sessions on a gopls daemon.
This can be used even if the debug server is not running, which will
become the default in a later CL.
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: Ib7d654a659fa47280584f9a7301b952cbccc565a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222669
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
When running gopls as a forwarder it attempts to forward the LSP to a
remote daemon. On posix systems, by default this uses a unix domain
socket at a predictable filesystem location.
As an extra precaution, attempt to verify that the remote socket is in
fact owned by the current user.
Also, change the default TCP listen address used on windows to bind to
localhost.
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: Ib24886d290089a773851c5439586c3ddc9eb797d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222246
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
When the gopls daemon is automatically managed (-remote=auto), it will
be started by one of the forwarder gopls processes that was in turn
started by the editor. By default, this puts it in the same process
group as the forwarder gopls.
Some editors (at least Vim) send SIGTERM to the process groups of
sidecar processes when exiting. This can cause the gopls daemon to
terminate, thereby losing state.
Rather than ignore SIGTERM (which is bound to be editor dependent
anyway), let's just put the gopls daemon in a separate session.
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: I71386fb54b8c2efe1c565f59763f46693a7d48b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221220
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
This allows us to register a telemetry exporter that works with mulitple active
debug instances.
It also means we don't have to store the debug information in our other objects.
Change-Id: I9a9d5b0407c3352b6eaff80fb2c434ca33f4e397
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221558
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
When using the experimental feature where gopls runs as deamon, the
remote is spawned with debug enabled. It currently exposes the debug
interface to all network interfaces. This should be configurable in
the future, but until then we should at least keep it on the
localhost interface.
This change starts the debug on the local interface instead of all.
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: I3184268dd434ae11ff5f8c3c57a229d22c158196
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221697
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
By running the client connection before the forwarder-remote handshake
completes, we introduce a race in the TestDebugInfoLifecycle: the editor
may connect and initialize before the handshake, and assertions on the
debug state fail.
Requiring that the handshake complete before running the client
connection fixes this flakiness. It also seems like a good thing to
have the handshake complete before proceeding with any LSP.
Fixesgolang/go#37444
Change-Id: I07187797b4759bcaf99f5b0a0b3cd7ac7de34f43
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220903
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
It would be bad behavior if a gopls forwarder process started the gopls
daemon and it stuck around indefinitely. Add an idle timeout by default
for the gopls daemon.
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: I0408a1e6a3b89d862803ae5c439d6aa0d8ed9494
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220521
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Gopls behavior on disconnection is currently somewhat undefined, because
it hasn't mattered when there was a single gopls session per binary
invocation. With golang/go#34111, this changes.
Checks are added to ensure clients and sessions are cleaned up when an LSP
connection closes. Also, normal client disconnection is differentiated
with the jsonrpc2.ErrDisconnected value.
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: I74d48ad6dcfc30d11f7f751dcffb20c18a4cbaa3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220519
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Most users will not want to manage their own gopls instance, but may
still want to benefit from using a shared instance.
This CL adds support for an 'auto' network type that can be encoded in
the -remote flag similarly to UDS (i.e. -remote="auto;uniqueid"). In
this mode, the actual remote address will be resolved automatically
based on the executing environment and unique identifier, and the remote
server will be started if it isn't already running.
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: Ib62159765a108f3645f57709b8ff079b39dd6727
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220137
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
In the ideal future, users will have one or more gopls instances, each
serving potentially many LSP clients. In order to have any hope of
navigating this web, clients and servers must know about eachother.
To allow for such an exchange of information, this CL adds an additional
handler layer to the serving configured in the lsprpc package. For now,
forwarders just use this layer to execute a handshake with the LSP
server, communicating the location of their logs and debug addresses.
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: Ic7432062c01a8bbd52fb4a058a95bbf5dc26baa3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220081
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
For testability, and to support the exchange of debug information across
Forwarder and server, it is helpful to encapsulate all debug information
on the instance object.
This CL moves all state in the debug package into a new 'State' type,
that is added as a field on the debug.Instance. While doing so, common
functionality for object collections is factored out into the objset
helper type.
Also add two new debug object types: Client and Server. These aren't yet
used, but will be in a later CL (and frankly it was easier to leave them
in this CL than to more carefully rewrite history...).
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: Ib809cd14cb957b41a9bcbd94a991f804531a76ea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220078
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
For testability, and to allow the exchange of debug information when
forwarding the LSP, it will be necessary to access debug information
stored in cache objects. This is cumbersome to do if our constructors
return source interfaces rather than concrete types.
This CL changes cache.New and (*Cache).NewSession to return concrete
types. This required removing NewSession from source.Cache. I would
argue that this makes sense from a philosophical perspective: everything
in the source package operates in a context where the Session and Cache
already exist.
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: I01721db827d51117f9479f1544b15cedae0c5921
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220077
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
For tests (and perhaps later, for daemon discovery), unix domain sockets
offer advantages over TCP: we can know the exact socket address that will be
used when starting a server subprocess. They also offer performance and
security advantages over TCP, and were specifically requested on
golang.org/issues/34111.
This CL adds support for listening on UDS, and uses this to implement an
additional regtest environment mode that starts up an external process.
This mode is disabled by default, but may be enabled by the
-enable_gopls_subprocess_tests.
The regtest TestMain may be hijacked to instead run as gopls, if a
special environment variable is set. This allows the the test runner to
start a separate process by using os.Argv[0]. The -gopls_test_binary
flag may be used to point tests at a separate gopls binary.
Updates golang/go#36879
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: I1cfdf55040e81ffa69a6726878a96529e5522e82
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218839
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Add a forwarder handler that alters messages before forwarding, for now,
it just intercepts the "exit" message.
Also, make it easier to write regression tests for a shared gopls
instance, by adding a helper that instantiates two connected
environments, and only runs in the shared execution modes.
Updates golang/go#36879
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: I7673f72ab71b5c7fd6ad65d274c15132a942e06a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218778
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Add a new Forwarder type to the lsprpc package, which implements the
jsonrpc2.StreamServer interface. This will be used to establish some
parity in the implementation of shared and singleton gopls servers.
Much more testing is needed, as is handling for the many edge cases
around forwarding the LSP, but since this is functionally equivalent to
TCP forwarding (and the -remote flag was already broken), I went ahead
and used the Forwarder to replace the forward method in the serve
command. This means that we can now use the combination of -listen and
-remote to chain together gopls servers... not that there's any reason
to do this.
Also, wrap the new regression tests with a focus on expressiveness when
testing the happy path, as well as parameterizing them so that they can
be run against different client/server execution environments. This
started to be sizable enough to warrant moving them to a separate
regtest package. The lsprpc package tests will instead focus on unit
testing the client-server binding logic.
Updates golang/go#36879
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: Ib98131a58aabc69299845d2ecefceccfc1199574
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218698
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Previously, the process of instantiating and running the LSP server was
sharded across the lsp, protocol, and cmd packages, and this resulted in
some APIs that are hard to work with. For example, it's hard to guess
the difference between lsp.NewClientServer, lsp.NewServer,
protocol.NewServer (which returns a client), and protocol.NewClient
(which returns a server).
This change reorganizes Server instantiation as follows:
+ The lsp.Server is now purely an implementation of the protocol.Server
interface. It is no longer responsible for installing itself into the
jsonrpc2 Stream, nor for running itself.
+ A new package 'lsprpc' is added, to implement the logic of binding an
incoming connection to an LSP server session. This is put in a
separate package for lack of a clear home: it didn't really
philosophically belong in any of the lsp, cmd, or protocol packages.
We can perhaps move it to cmd in the future, but I'd like to keep it
as a separate package while I develop request forwarding.
simplified import graph:
jsonrpc2 ⭠ lsprpc ⭠ cmd
⭩ ⭦
lsp (t.b.d. client tests)
⭩ ⭨
protocol source
+ The jsonrpc2 package is extended to have a minimal API for running a
'StreamServer': something analogous to an HTTP server that listens
for new connections and delegates to a handler (but we couldn't use
the word 'Handler' for this delegate as it was already taken).
After these changes, I hope that the concerns of "serving the LSP",
"serving jsonrpc2", and "installing the LSP on jsonrpc2" are more
logically organized, though one legitimate criticism is that the word
'Server' is still heavily overloaded.
This change prepares a subsequent change which hijacks the jsonrpc2
connection when forwarding messages to a shared gopls instance.
To test this change, the following improvements are made:
+ A servertest package is added to make it easier to run a test against
an in-process jsonrpc2 server. For now, this uses TCP but it could
easily be modified to use io.Pipe.
+ cmd tests are updated to use the servertest package. Unfortunately it
wasn't yet possible to eliminate the concept of `remote=internal` in
favor of just using multiple sessions, because view initialization
involves calling both `go env` and `packages.Load`, which slow down
session startup significantly. See also golang.org/issue/35968.
Instead, the syntax for `-remote=internal` is modified to be
`-remote=internal@127.0.0.1:12345`.
+ An additional test for request cancellation is added for the
sessionserver package. This test uncovered a bug: when calling
Canceller.Cancel, we were using id rather than &id, which resulted in
incorrect json serialization (as only the pointer receiver implements
the json.Marshaller interface).
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: I75c219df634348cdf53a9e57839b98588311a9ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/215742
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
