Since Go1.10, go test runs vet on the tests before executing them.
Moreover, the vet tool typechecks the package under analysis with
go/types before running. In Go1.10, a typechecking failure just caused
a warning to be printed. In Go1.11, a typechecking failure will cause
vet to exit with a fatal error (see Issue #21287).
This means that starting with Go1.11, tests that don't typecheck will
fail immediately. This would not normally be an issue, since a test
that doesn't typecheck shouldn't even compile, and it should already
be broken.
Unfortunately, there's a bug in gc that makes it accept programs with
unused variables inside a closure (Issue #3059). This means that a
test with an unused variable inside a closure, that compiled and
passed in Go1.10, will fail in the typechecking step of vet starting
with Go1.11.
Explain this in the 1.11 release notes.
Fixes#26109
Change-Id: I970c1033ab6bc985d8c64bd24f56e854af155f96
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/121455
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Change "have to" to "need to" for clarity and to avoid a
peculiar English idiom.
Change-Id: Iec2b1f841d0353dd7925f8f934fe82d4ed059d7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/123495
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
It will not be present in go1.11beta1 but will be present
in subsequent releases.
Change-Id: I298fb682945345bb4a34ec83802fd644f75bdd98
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/120756
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
It's more common to specify GOOS/GOARCH values in that order,
rather than the inverse. Fix the order.
Updates #18892.
Change-Id: I8551508599e019f6617dc007397b562c9926418d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/120057
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
