Speed up the test suite by building the errors package rather than the
strings package in some cases where the specific package we are
building doesn't matter. The errors package is smaller, and doesn't
have any assembler code.
Also make a couple of tests run in parallel.
Update #11779.
Change-Id: I62e47f8655f9d85bf93c70ae6e6121276d96aee0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12365
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
It changes GOROOT, so we shouldn't run it in short mode. Also, it's
fairly slow.
Update #11779.
Change-Id: I3d3344954cf9b2ac70070c878a67cb65ac8fd85c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12364
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
On my laptop reduces time required for test from 22 seconds to 0.14
seconds.
Update #11779.
Change-Id: I715d85bd9c6f7683c6915eedd2539813aa5efc58
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12363
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
This is mostly Russ's https://golang.org/cl/12145 but with some extra fixes to
account for the fact that function declarations without implementations now
break shared libraries, and including my test case.
Fixes#11480.
Change-Id: Iabdc2934a0378e5025e4e7affadb535eaef2c8f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12340
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The runtime.GC documentation was rewritten in df2809f to make it clear
that it blocks until GC is complete, but the re-rewrite in ed9a4c9 and
e28a679 lost this property when clarifying that it may also block the
entire program and not just the caller.
Try to arrive at wording that conveys both of these properties.
Change-Id: I1e255322aa28a21a548556ecf2a44d8d8ac524ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12392
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The findmoduledatap function will not return nil in ordinary use, but
check for nil to try to avoid crashing when we are already crashing.
Update #11783.
Change-Id: If7b1adb51efab13b4c1a37b6f3c9ad22641a0b56
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12391
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The default value for error is nil so there is no need to assign this
value here.
Change-Id: I4714ef7607996ccbf91b704390e1d1d39ee3847b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12355
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Old style. Make it compliant with our code review comments document.
Also, make WriteString's return parameter named 'n', not 'ret', for
consistency.
Noticed during another documentation review.
Change-Id: Ie88910c5841f8353bc5c0152e2168b497578e15e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12324
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
We shouldn't guarantee this behavior, but suggest it's possible.
Change-Id: I4c2afb48b99be4d91537306d3337171a13c9990a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12346
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
The change https://golang.org/cl/12192 changed the get code to use the
list of package imports, not the computed list of dependencies, as the
computed list could be out of date if the package changed when using
go get -u. Computing the dependency list would skip an import of "C",
but that would still be on the package import list. This changes the
code to skip "C" when walking the import list.
No test--the best test would be to add an import of "C" to
github.com/rsc/go-get-issue-9224-cmd for TestGoGetUpdate.
Fixes#11738.
Change-Id: Id89ddafeade2391d15688bfd142fafd67844a941
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12322
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Updates #10061
CL 12353 updated the documentation for os.Rename to stipulate the function will
return errors of type *os.LinkError. This CL adds a test to ensure that the
implementations continue to obey this contract.
Change-Id: I41beb8c9d8356c737de251fdc6f652caab3ee636
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12329
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
No code changes. Just make it clear that runtime.GC is not concurrent.
Change-Id: I00a99ebd26402817c665c9a128978cef19f037be
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12345
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The document `doc/go_spec.html` uses "preceeding" instead of the word
"preceding" in one place.
Fixed another occurrence in `src/go/types/typexpr.go`.
Change-Id: Ic67f62026b5c9d002c5c5632299f14ecac8b02ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12354
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
An out-of-date comment snuck in to cc8f544. Remove it.
Change-Id: I5bc7c17e737d1cabe57b88de06d7579c60ca28ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12328
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Rename should document that it returns *LinkError,
like Create and Stat do.
Fixes#10061
Change-Id: I7bfe8b0267f6c4a57dd6b26cba44928714711724
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12353
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This fixes a race between 1) sweeping and freeing an unmarked large
span and 2) reusing that span and allocating from it. This race arises
because mSpan_Sweep returns spans for large objects to the heap
*before* heapBitsSweepSpan clears the mark bit on the object in the
span.
Specifically, the following sequence of events can lead to an
incorrectly zeroed bitmap byte, which causes the garbage collector to
not trace any pointers in that object (the pointer bits for the first
four words are cleared, and the scan bits are also cleared, so it
looks like a no-scan object).
1) P0 calls mSpan_Sweep on a large span S0 with an unmarked object on it.
2) mSpan_Sweep calls heapBitsSweepSpan, which invokes the callback for
the one (unmarked) object on the span.
3) The callback calls mHeap_Free, which makes span S0 available for
allocation, but this is too early.
4) P1 grabs this S0 from the heap to use for allocation.
5) P1 allocates an object on this span and writes that object's type
bits to the bitmap.
6) P0 returns from the callback to heapBitsSweepSpan.
heapBitsSweepSpan clears the byte containing the mark, even though
this span is now owned by P1 and this byte contains important
bitmap information.
This fixes this problem by simply delaying the mHeap_Free until after
the heapBitsSweepSpan. I think the overall logic of mSpan_Sweep could
be simplified now, but this seems like the minimal change.
Fixes#11617.
Change-Id: I6b1382c7e7cc35f81984467c0772fe9848b7522a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12320
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Adjusts for the move from golang.org/x/tools/go/types and .../go/exact
to go/types and go/constant in the main repository.
Change-Id: I0da7248c540939e3e9b09c915b0a296937f1be73
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12284
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
At least the most important parts, I think.
Fixes#10552
Change-Id: I1a03c5405bdbef337e0245d226e9247d3d067393
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12246
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The iOS simulator compiles with GOOS=darwin GOARCH=386, and x509
sets the inappropriate flag -mmacosx-version-min=10.6. Condition
its compilation on the absence of an "ios" build tag.
Fixes#11736.
Change-Id: I4aa230643347320c3cb9d03b972734b2e0db930e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12301
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Also add a link to a couple of the talks from GopherCon 2015.
Change-Id: I11e1c550e999553163d3fb5e900f167c849ce33f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12287
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
This seems to have broken arm64 in a mysterious way. Will try again later.
This reverts commit 0a3c991fd3.
Change-Id: Ic1b53413c4168977a27381d9cc6fb8d9d7cbb780
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12245
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
If we receive an HTTP request with "Expect: 100-continue" and the
Handler never read to EOF, the conn is in an unknown state.
Don't reuse that connection.
Fixes#11549
Change-Id: I5be93e7a54e899d615b05f72bdcf12b25304bc60
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12262
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Now that we care about the protocol of Git remotes (for the -insecure
flag), we need to recognize and parse the SCP-like remote format.
Fixesgolang/go#11457
Change-Id: Ia26132274fafb1cbfefe2475f7ac5f17ccd6da40
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12226
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Running a safe-point function on syscall entry uses systemstack() and
hence clobbers g.sched.pc and g.sched.sp. Fix this by re-saving them
after the systemstack, just like in the other uses of systemstack in
reentersyscall.
Change-Id: I47868a53eba24d81919fda56ef6bbcf72f1f922e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12125
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently, we run a P's safe-point function immediately after entering
_Psyscall state. This is unsafe, since as soon as we put the P in
_Psyscall, we no longer control the P and another M may claim it.
We'll still run the safe-point function only once (because doing so
races on an atomic), but the P may no longer be at a safe-point when
we do so.
In particular, this means that the use of forEachP to dispose all P's
gcw caches is unsafe. A P may enter a syscall, run the safe-point
function, and dispose the P's gcw cache concurrently with another M
claiming the P and attempting to use its gcw cache. If this happens,
we may empty the gcw's workbuf after putting it on
work.{full,partial}, or add pointers to it after putting it in
work.empty. This will cause an assertion failure when we later pop the
workbuf from the list and its object count is inconsistent with the
list we got it from.
Fix this by running the safe-point function just before putting the P
in _Psyscall.
Related to #11640. This probably fixes this issue, but while I'm able
to show that we can enter a bad safe-point state as a result of this,
I can't reproduce that specific failure.
Change-Id: I6989c8ca7ef2a4a941ae1931e9a0748cbbb59434
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12124
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
There was already special code to recognize "?" in hidden_structdcl,
which is used for inlined types and variables. This recognizes "?" in
structdcl as well, a case that arises when a struct type appears
within an inlined function body.
Fixes#10219.
Change-Id: Ic5257ae54f817e0d4a189c2294dcd633c9f2101a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12241
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The parser treats (R1+R2) on ppc64 the same as (R1,R2) on arm,
but it is not strictly a "register pair". Improve the text.
No semantic change.
Change-Id: Ib8b14881c6467add0d53150a901c01e962afb28b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12212
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
