When I was plumbing min/max support through the compiler, I was
thinking mostly about numeric argument types. As a result, I forgot
that escape analysis would need to be aware that min/max can operate
on string values, which contain pointers.
Fixes#64565.
Change-Id: I36127ce5a2da942401910fa0f9de922726c9f94d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/547715
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The compiler renames anonymous and blank result parameters to ~rN or
~bN, but the current semantics for computing N are rather annoying and
difficult to reproduce cleanly. They also lead to difficult to read
escape analysis results in tests.
This CL changes N to always be calculated as the parameter's index
within the function's result parameter tuple. E.g., if a function has
a single result, it will now always be named "~r0".
The normative change to this CL is fairly simple, but it requires
updating a lot of test expectations.
Change-Id: I58a3c94de00cb822cb94efe52d115531193c993c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/323010
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
This CL changes "T literal.M" error message to "T{...}.M". It's clearer
expression and focusing user on actual issue.
Updates #38745
Change-Id: I84b455a86742f37e0bde5bf390aa02984eecc3c9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/253677
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This information is redundant with the position information already
provided. Also, no other -m diagnostics print out function name.
While here, report parameter leak diagnostics against the parameter
declaration position rather than the function, and use Warnl for
"moved to heap" messages.
Test cases updated programmatically by removing the first word from
every "no match for" error emitted by run.go:
go run run.go |& \
sed -E -n 's/^(.*):(.*): no match for `([^ ]* (.*))` in:$/\1!\2!\3!\4/p' | \
while IFS='!' read -r fn line before after; do
before=$(echo "$before" | sed 's/[.[\*^$()+?{|]/\\&/g')
after=$(echo "$after" | sed -E 's/(\&|\\)/\\&/g')
fn=$(find . -name "${fn}" | head -1)
sed -i -E -e "${line}s/\"${before}\"/\"${after}\"/" "${fn}"
done
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I6e02486b1409e4a8dbb2b9b816d22095835426b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/195040
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Prep for subsequent CLs to remove old escape analysis pass.
This CL removes -newescape=true from tests that use it, and deletes
tests that use -newescape=false. (For history, see CL 170447.)
Notably, this removes escape_because.go without any replacement, but
this is being tracked by #31489.
Change-Id: I6f6058d58fff2c5d210cb1d2713200cc9f501ca7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/187617
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The new escape analysis implementation tries to emit debugging
diagnostics that are compatible with the existing implementation, but
there's a handful of cases that are easier to handle by updating the
test expectations instead.
For regress tests that need updating, the original file is copied to
oldescapeXXX.go.go with -newescape=false added to the //errorcheck
line, while the file is updated in place with -newescape=true and new
test requirements.
Notable test changes:
1) escape_because.go looks for a lot of detailed internal debugging
messages that are fairly particular to how esc.go works and that I
haven't attempted to port over to escape.go yet.
2) There are a lot of "leaking param: x to result ~r1 level=-1"
messages for code like
func(p *int) *T { return &T{p} }
that were simply wrong. Here &T must be heap allocated unconditionally
(because it's being returned); and since p is stored into it, p
escapes unconditionally too. esc.go incorrectly reports that p escapes
conditionally only if the returned pointer escaped.
3) esc.go used to print each "leaking param" analysis result as it
discovered them, which could lead to redundant messages (e.g., that a
param leaks at level=0 and level=1). escape.go instead prints
everything at the end, once it knows the shortest path to each sink.
4) esc.go didn't precisely model direct-interface types, resulting in
some values unnecessarily escaping to the heap when stored into
non-escaping interface values.
5) For functions written in assembly, esc.go only printed "does not
escape" messages, whereas escape.go prints "does not escape" or
"leaking param" as appropriate, consistent with the behavior for
functions written in Go.
6) 12 tests included "BAD" annotations identifying cases where esc.go
was unnecessarily heap allocating something. These are all fixed by
escape.go.
Updates #23109.
Change-Id: Iabc9eb14c94c9cadde3b183478d1fd54f013502f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170447
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
For most nodes (e.g., OPTRLIT, OMAKESLICE, OCONVIFACE), escape
analysis prints "escapes to heap" or "does not escape" to indicate
whether that node's allocation can be heap or stack allocated.
These messages are also emitted for OADDR, even though OADDR does not
actually allocate anything itself. Moreover, it's redundant because
escape analysis already prints "moved to heap" diagnostics when an
OADDR node like "&x" causes x to require heap allocation.
Because OADDR nodes don't allocate memory, my escape analysis rewrite
doesn't naturally emit the "escapes to heap" / "does not escape"
diagnostics for them. It's also non-trivial to replicate the exact
semantics esc.go uses for OADDR.
Since there are so many of these messages, I'm disabling them in this
CL by themselves. I modified esc.go to suppress the Warnl calls
without any other behavior changes, and then used a shell script to
automatically remove any ERROR messages mentioned by run.go in
"missing error" or "no match for" lines.
Fixes#16300.
Updates #23109.
Change-Id: I3993e2743c3ff83ccd0893f4e73b366ff8871a57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170319
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Indirect function and method calls should leak everything,
but they didn't.
This fix had no particular effect on the cost of running the
compiler on html/template/*.go and added a single new "escape"
to the standard library:
syscall/syscall_unix.go:85: &b[0] escapes to heap
in
if errno := m.munmap(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&b[0])),
uintptr(len(b))); errno != nil {
Added specific escape testing to escape_calls.go
(and verified that it fails without this patch)
I also did a little code cleanup around the changes in esc.c.
Fixes#10925
Change-Id: I9984b701621ad4c49caed35b01e359295c210033
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10295
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This includes the following information in the per-function summary:
outK = paramJ encoded in outK bits for paramJ
outK = *paramJ encoded in outK bits for paramJ
heap = paramJ EscHeap
heap = *paramJ EscContentEscapes
Note that (currently) if the address of a parameter is taken and
returned, necessarily a heap allocation occurred to contain that
reference, and the heap can never refer to stack, therefore the
parameter and everything downstream from it escapes to the heap.
The per-function summary information now has a tuneable number of bits
(2 is probably noticeably better than 1, 3 is likely overkill, but it
is now easy to check and the -m debugging output includes information
that allows you to figure out if more would be better.)
A new test was added to check pointer flow through struct-typed and
*struct-typed parameters and returns; some of these are sensitive to
the number of summary bits, and ought to yield better results with a
more competent escape analysis algorithm. Another new test checks
(some) correctness with array parameters, results, and operations.
The old analysis inferred a piece of plan9 runtime was non-escaping by
counteracting overconservative analysis with buggy analysis; with the
bug fixed, the result was too conservative (and it's not easy to fix
in this framework) so the source code was tweaked to get the desired
result. A test was added against the discovered bug.
The escape analysis was further improved splitting the "level" into
3 parts, one tracking the conventional "level" and the other two
computing the highest-level-suffix-from-copy, which is used to
generally model the cancelling effect of indirection applied to
address-of.
With the improved escape analysis enabled, it was necessary to
modify one of the runtime tests because it now attempts to allocate
too much on the (small, fixed-size) G0 (system) stack and this
failed the test.
Compiling src/std after touching src/runtime/*.go with -m logging
turned on shows 420 fewer heap allocation sites (10538 vs 10968).
Profiling allocations in src/html/template with
for i in {1..5} ;
do go tool 6g -memprofile=mastx.${i}.prof -memprofilerate=1 *.go;
go tool pprof -alloc_objects -text mastx.${i}.prof ;
done
showed a 15% reduction in allocations performed by the compiler.
Update #3753
Update #4720Fixes#10466
Change-Id: I0fd97d5f5ac527b45f49e2218d158a6e89951432
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8202
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
