The compiler has a phase ordering problem. Escape analysis runs
before wrapper generation. When a generated wrapper calls a method
defined in a different package, if that call is inlined, there will be
no escape information for the variables defined in the inlined call.
Those variables will be placed on the stack, which fails if they
actually do escape.
There are probably various complex ways to fix this. This is a simple
way to avoid it: when a generated wrapper calls a method defined in a
different package, treat all local variables as escaping.
Fixes#9537.
Change-Id: I530f39346de16ad173371c6c3f69cc189351a4e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3092
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
We were failing ^uint16(0xffff) == 0, as we computed 0xffff0000 instead.
I could only trigger a failure for the above case, the other two tests
^uint16(0xfffe) == 1 and -uint16(0xffff) == 1 didn't seem to fail
previously. Somehow they get MOVHUs inserted for other reasons (used
by CMP instead of TST?). I fixed OMINUS anyway, better safe than
sorry.
Fixes#9604
Change-Id: I4c2d5bdc667742873ac029fdbe3db0cf12893c27
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2940
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
The various files are confusingly named and their operation
not easy to see. Add a comment to cmplxdivide.c, one of the few
C files that will endure in the repository, to explain how to build
and run the test.
Change-Id: I1fd5c564a14217e1b9815b09bc24cc43c54c096f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2850
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Recognize loops of the form
for i := range a {
a[i] = zero
}
in which the evaluation of a is free from side effects.
Replace these loops with calls to memclr.
This occurs in the stdlib in 18 places.
The motivating example is clearing a byte slice:
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkGoMemclr5 3.31 3.26 -1.51%
BenchmarkGoMemclr16 13.7 3.28 -76.06%
BenchmarkGoMemclr64 50.8 4.14 -91.85%
BenchmarkGoMemclr256 157 6.02 -96.17%
Update #5373.
Change-Id: I99d3e6f5f268e8c6499b7e661df46403e5eb83e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2520
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
run GC in its own background goroutine making the
caller runnable if resources are available. This is
critical in single goroutine applications.
Allow goroutines that allocate a lot to help out
the GC and in doing so throttle their own allocation.
Adjust test so that it only detects that a GC is run
during init calls and not whether the GC is memory
efficient. Memory efficiency work will happen later
in 1.5.
Change-Id: I4306f5e377bb47c69bda1aedba66164f12b20c2b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2349
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This test was taking a long time, reduce its zealousness.
Change-Id: Ib824247b84b0039a9ec690f72336bef3738d4c44
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2502
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
The compiler converts 'val, ok = m[key]' to
tmp, ok = <runtime call>
val = *tmp
For lookups of the form '_, ok = m[key]',
the second statement is unnecessary.
By not generating it we save a nil check.
Change-Id: I21346cc195cb3c62e041af8b18770c0940358695
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1975
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
If the user provided a key but no value via -ldflag -X,
another linker flag was used as the value.
Placing the user's flags at the end avoids this problem.
It also provides the user the opportunity to
override existing linker flags.
Fixes#8810.
Change-Id: I96f4190713dc9a9c29142e56658446fba7fb6bc8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2242
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
These tests were enabled as part of change 1774.
They depend on the errchk tool, which is a Perl
script. However, Perl is not available on Plan 9.
Change-Id: I82707aae16013acc9a3800d39b0084588b852b53
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2031
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Broken by e7173dfdfd
Fix by simply disabling the relevant tests.
* bug248 and bug345 require errchk, but we can't
rely on perl being available.
* bug369 is disabled anyway.
Change-Id: Idf73ebccb066943e3fe17c2f662b37238ec74dfe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2052
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Gccgo creates a struct to hold the arguments for the deferred
function. In this example the struct holds a type defined in a
different package. The bug was that gccgo tried to create an equality
function for this struct, and it implemented that function by calling
the equality function for the type defined in the other package.
Since that type is not exported, the reference to the equality
function failed at link time. Normally it is impossible for a struct
to directly contain a member that is an unexported type from another
package, but in this specific case it was possible. Fixed in gccgo
with https://codereview.appspot.com/183500043 .
Change-Id: I8ec3a33631225b9ac2a4ac060cb4d10b4635e60b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1690
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
* bug248, bug345, bug369, and bug429 were ported from bash commands to run scripts. bug369 remains disabled.
* bug395 is a test for issue 1909, which is still open. It is marked as skip now and will be usable with compile with run.go when issue 1909 is fixed.
Fixes#4139
Updates #1909
Change-Id: Ibb5fbfb5cf72ddc285829245318eeacd3fb5a636
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1774
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
When we do y = &x for global variables x and y, y gets initialized
at link time. Do the same for y = &x.f if x is a struct and y=&x[5]
if x is an array.
fixes#9217fixes#9355
Change-Id: Iea3c0ce2ce1b309e2b760e345608fd95460b5713
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1691
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
This test was added in CL 151000043.
It got lost in CL 144630044.
Change-Id: I318ab11be8e3e7489fc1395457c029c8bdb2aa41
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1773
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Gccgo incorrectly executed functions multiple times when they appeared
in a composite literal that required a conversion between different
interface types.
Change-Id: I7b40e76ed23fa8440ffa03b262041265c109adf7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1710
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Gccgo failed to create the type descriptor for the type used to
allocate the nil value passed to append as the second argument when
append is called with only one argument. Calling append with only one
argument is unusual but obviously should not cause a compiler crash.
Change-Id: I530821847dfd68f0302de6ca6a84dfbc79653935
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1692
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
It shouldn't semacquire() inside an acquirem(), the runtime
thinks that means deadlock. It actually isn't a deadlock, but it
looks like it because acquirem() does m.locks++.
Candidate for inclusion in 1.4.1. runtime.Stack with all=true
is pretty unuseable in GOMAXPROCS>1 environment.
fixes#9321
Change-Id: Iac6b664217d24763b9878c20e49229a1ecffc805
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1600
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Make sure dequeueing from a channel queue does not exhibit quadratic time behavior.
Change-Id: Ifb7c709b026f74c7e783610d4914dd92909a441b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1212
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Usage:
fibo <n> compute fibonacci(n), n must be >= 0
fibo -bench benchmark fibonacci computation (takes about 1 min)
Additional flags:
-half add values using two half-digit additions
-opt optimize memory allocation through reuse
-short only print the first 10 digits of very large fibonacci numbers
This change was reviewed in detail as https://codereview.appspot.com/168480043 .
Change-Id: I7c86d49c5508532ea6206d00f424cf2117d2fe41
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1211
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
When we start work on Gerrit, ppc64 and garbage collection
work will continue in the master branch, not the dev branches.
(We may still use dev branches for other things later, but
these are ready to be merged, and doing it now, before moving
to Git means we don't have to have dev branches working
in the Gerrit workflow on day one.)
TBR=rlh
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/183140043
640 bytes ought to be enough for anybody.
We'll bring this back down before Go 1.5. That's issue 9214.
TBR=rlh
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/188730043
The SudoG used to sit on the stack, so it was cheap to allocated
and didn't need to be cleaned up when finished.
For the conversion to Go, we had to move sudog off the stack
for a few reasons, so we added a cache of recently used sudogs
to keep allocation cheap. But we didn't add any of the necessary
cleanup before adding a SudoG to the new cache, and so the cached
SudoGs had stale pointers inside them that have caused all sorts
of awful, hard to debug problems.
CL 155760043 made sure SudoG.elem is cleaned up.
CL 150520043 made sure SudoG.selectdone is cleaned up.
This CL makes sure SudoG.next, SudoG.prev, and SudoG.waitlink
are cleaned up. I should have done this when I did the other two
fields; instead I wasted a week tracking down a leak they caused.
A dangling SudoG.waitlink can point into a sudogcache list that
has been "forgotten" in order to let the GC collect it, but that
dangling .waitlink keeps the list from being collected.
And then the list holding the SudoG with the dangling waitlink
can find itself in the same situation, and so on. We end up
with lists of lists of unusable SudoGs that are still linked into
the object graph and never collected (given the right mix of
non-trivial selects and non-channel synchronization).
More details in golang.org/issue/9110.
Fixes#9110.
LGTM=r
R=r
CC=dvyukov, golang-codereviews, iant, khr
https://golang.org/cl/177870043
This is to reduce the delta between dev.cc and dev.garbage to just garbage collector changes.
These are the files that had merge conflicts and have been edited by hand:
malloc.go
mem_linux.go
mgc.go
os1_linux.go
proc1.go
panic1.go
runtime1.go
LGTM=austin
R=austin
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/174180043
Now the only difference between dev.cc and dev.garbage
is the runtime conversion on the one side and the
garbage collection on the other. They both have the
same set of changes from default and dev.power64.
LGTM=austin
R=austin
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/172570043
The remaining run-only tests will be migrated to run.go in another CL.
This CL will break the build due to issues 8746 and 8806.
Update #4139
Update #8746
Update #8806
LGTM=rsc
R=rsc, bradfitz, iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/144630044
Now each C printf, Go print, or Go println is guaranteed
not to be interleaved with other calls of those functions.
This should help when debugging concurrent failures.
LGTM=rlh
R=rlh
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/169120043
One failing case this removes is:
var bytes = []byte("hello, world")
var copy_bytes = bytes
We could handle this in the compiler, but it requires special
case for a variable that is initialized to the value of a
variable that is initialized to a string literal converted to
[]byte. This seems an unlikely case--it never occurs in the
standrd library--and it seems unnecessary to write the code to
handle it.
If we do want to support this case, one approach is
https://golang.org/cl/171840043.
The other failing cases are of the form
var bx bool
var copy_bx = bx
The compiler used to initialize copy_bx to false. However,
that led to issue 7665, since bx may be initialized in non-Go
code. The compiler no longer assumes that bx must be false,
so copy_bx can not be statically initialized.
We can fix these with https://golang.org/cl/169040043
if we also pass -complete to the compiler as part of this
test. This is OK but it's too late in the release cycle.
Fixes#8746.
LGTM=rsc
R=rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/165400043
On power64x, this one line in live.go reports that t is live
because of missing optimization passes. This isn't what this
test is trying to test, so shuffle bad40 so that it still
accomplishes the intent of the test without also depending on
optimization.
LGTM=rsc
R=rsc, dave
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/167110043
The remaining failures in this test are because of incomplete
optimization support on power64x. Tracked in issue 9058.
LGTM=rsc
R=rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/168130043
All three cases of clearfat were wrong on power64x.
The cases that handle 1032 bytes and up and 32 bytes and up
both use MOVDU (one directly generated in a loop and the other
via duffzero), which leaves the pointer register pointing at
the *last written* address. The generated code was not
accounting for this, so the byte fill loop was re-zeroing the
last zeroed dword, rather than the bytes following the last
zeroed dword. Fix this by simply adding an additional 8 byte
offset to the byte zeroing loop.
The case that handled under 32 bytes was also wrong. It
didn't update the pointer register at all, so the byte zeroing
loop was simply re-zeroing the beginning of region. Again,
the fix is to add an offset to the byte zeroing loop to
account for this.
LGTM=dave, bradfitz
R=rsc, dave, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/168870043
