Added a paragraph and examples explaining when an implementation
may use fused floating-point operations (such as FMA) and how to
prevent operation fusion.
For #17895.
Change-Id: I64c9559fc1097e597525caca420cfa7032d67014
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40391
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The section on map literals mentions constant map keys but doesn't say
what happens for equal non-constant map keys - that is covered in the
section on evaluation order. Added respective link for clarity.
Fixes#19689.
Change-Id: If9a5368ba02e8250d4bb0a1d60d0de26a1f37bbb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38598
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Updates #17802
Change-Id: I65ea0f4cde973604c04051e7eb25d12e4facecd3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36626
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
POSIX Shell only supports = to compare variables inside '[' tests. But
this is Bash, where == is an alias for =. In practice they're the same,
but the current form is inconsisnent and breaks POSIX for no good
reason.
Change-Id: I38fa7a5a90658dc51acc2acd143049e510424ed8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38031
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The (original) section on "Operators and Delimiters" introduced
superfluous terminology ("delimiter", "special token") which
didn't matter and was used inconsistently.
Removed any mention of "delimiter" or "special token" and now
simply group the special character tokens into "operators"
(clearly defined via links), and "punctuation" (everything else).
Fixes#19450.
Change-Id: Ife31b24b95167ace096f93ed180b7eae41c66808
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38073
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Fixes#19223.
Change-Id: I4cc8e81559a1313e1477ee36902e1b653155a888
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37374
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
This change removes the punitive language and anonymous reporting mechanism
from the Code of Conduct document. Read on for the rationale.
More than a year has passed since the Go Code of Conduct was introduced.
In that time, there have been a small number (<30) of reports to the Working Group.
Some reports we handled well, with positive outcomes for all involved.
A few reports we handled badly, resulting in hurt feelings and a bad
experience for all involved.
On reflection, the reports that had positive outcomes were ones where the
Working Group took the role of advisor/facilitator, listening to complaints and
providing suggestions and advice to the parties involved.
The reports that had negative outcomes were ones where the subject of the
report felt threatened by the Working Group and Code of Conduct.
After some discussion among the Working Group, we saw that we are most
effective as facilitators, rather than disciplinarians. The various Go spaces
already have moderators; this change to the CoC acknowledges their authority
and places the group in a purely advisory role. If an incident is
reported to the group we may provide information to or make a
suggestion the moderators, but the Working Group need not (and should not) have
any authority to take disciplinary action.
In short, we want it to be clear that the Working Group are here to help
resolve conflict, period.
The second change made here is the removal of the anonymous reporting mechanism.
To date, the quality of anonymous reports has been low, and with no way to
reach out to the reporter for more information there is often very little we
can do in response. Removing this one-way reporting mechanism strengthens the
message that the Working Group are here to facilitate a constructive dialogue.
Change-Id: Iee52aff5446accd0dae0c937bb3aa89709ad5fb4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37014
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
CL (change list) pops out of nowhere and confuses the
reader. Use "change" instead to be consistent with the
rest of the document.
Fixes#18989.
Change-Id: I525a63a195dc6bb992c8ad0f10c2f2e1b2b952df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36564
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
To avoid confusion caused by the term "named type" (which now just
means a type with a name, but formerly meant a type declared with
a non-alias type declaration), a type declaration now comes in two
forms: alias declarations and type definitions. Both declare a type
name, but type definitions also define new types.
Replace the use of "named type" with "defined type" elsewhere in
the spec.
For #18130.
Change-Id: I49f5ddacefce90354eb65ee5fbf10ba737221995
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36213
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Dave and Jason have moved on to other things.
Change-Id: I702d11bedfab1f47a33679a48c2309f49021229e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36450
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
For #18130.
f8b4123613 [dev.typealias] spec: use term 'embedded field' rather than 'anonymous field'
9ecc3ee252 [dev.typealias] cmd/compile: avoid false positive cycles from type aliases
49b7af8a30 [dev.typealias] reflect: add test for type aliases
9bbb07ddec [dev.typealias] cmd/compile, reflect: fix struct field names for embedded byte, rune
43c7094386 [dev.typealias] reflect: fix StructOf use of StructField to match StructField docs
9657e0b077 [dev.typealias] cmd/doc: update for type alias
de2e5459ae [dev.typealias] cmd/compile: declare methods after resolving receiver type
9259f3073a [dev.typealias] test: match gccgo error messages on alias2.go
5d92916770 [dev.typealias] cmd/compile: change Func.Shortname to *Sym
a7c884efc1 [dev.typealias] go/internal/gccgoimporter: support for type aliases
5802cfd900 [dev.typealias] cmd/compile: export/import test cases for type aliases
d7cabd40dd [dev.typealias] go/types: clarified doc string
cc2dcce3d7 [dev.typealias] cmd/compile: a few better comments related to alias types
5c160b28ba [dev.typealias] cmd/compile: improved error message for cyles involving type aliases
b2386dffa1 [dev.typealias] cmd/compile: type-check type alias declarations
ac8421f9a5 [dev.typealias] cmd/compile: various minor cleanups
f011e0c6c3 [dev.typealias] cmd/compile, go/types, go/importer: various alias related fixes
49de5f0351 [dev.typealias] cmd/compile, go/importer: define export format and implement importing of type aliases
5ceec42dc0 [dev.typealias] go/types: export TypeName.IsAlias so clients can use it
aa1f0681bc [dev.typealias] go/types: improved Object printing
c80748e389 [dev.typealias] go/types: remove some more vestiges of prior alias implementation
80d8b69e95 [dev.typealias] go/types: implement type aliases
a917097b5e [dev.typealias] go/build: add go1.9 build tag
3e11940437 [dev.typealias] cmd/compile: recognize type aliases but complain for now (not yet supported)
e0a05c274a [dev.typealias] cmd/gofmt: added test cases for alias type declarations
2e5116bd99 [dev.typealias] go/ast, go/parser, go/printer, go/types: initial type alias support
Change-Id: Ia65f2e011fd7195f18e1dce67d4d49b80a261203
First steps towards defining type aliases in the spec.
This is a nomenclature clarification, not a language change.
The spec used all three terms 'embedded type', 'anonymous field',
and 'embedded field'. Users where using the terms inconsistently.
The notion of an 'anonymous' field was always misleading since they
always had a de-facto name. With type aliases that name becomes even
more important because we may have different names for the same type.
Use the term 'embedded field' consistently and remove competing
terminology.
For #18130.
Change-Id: I2083bbc85788cab0b2e2cb1ff58b2f979491f001
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35108
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Update docs on correspondence between Go releases and GCC releases.
Update C type that corresponds to Go type `int`.
Drop out of date comments about Ubuntu and RTEMS.
Change-Id: Ic1b5ce9f242789af23ec3b7e7a64c9d257d6913e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35631
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
You have to actually run make.bash (or make.bat).
Update #18771.
Change-Id: Ie6672a4e4abde0150c1ae57cabb1222de2c78716
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35632
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Change-Id: Iac713ae1f322f893c92b3fc47fe9b5719052f9eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35240
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Also fix a couple of other errors.
Fixes#6877
Change-Id: I94c81c5847cc7b0adab19418e71687bc2ee7fe94
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34960
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
We are seeing a bad stack map in #18190. In a copystack, it is
mistaking a slot for a pointer.
Presumably this is caused either by our fledgling dynlink support on
darwin, or a consequence of having two copies of the runtime in the
process. But I have been unable to work out which in the 1.8 window,
so pushing darwin support to 1.9 or later.
Change-Id: I7fa4d2dede75033d9a428f24c1837a4613bd2639
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34391
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
