CL 440455 fixed missing walk pass for static initialization slice.
However, slicelit may produce un-typechecked node, thus we need to do
typecheck for sinit before calling walkStmtList.
Fixes#56727
Change-Id: I40730cebcd09f2be4389d71c5a90eb9a060e4ab7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/450215
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Add a new SSA opcode ISELZ, similar to ISELB to represent a select
of value or 0. Then, merge candidate ISEL opcodes inside the late
lower pass.
This avoids complicating rules within the the lower pass.
Change-Id: I3b14c94b763863aadc834b0e910a85870c131313
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/442596
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Joedian Reid <joedian@golang.org>
If an imported, non-generic function F transitively calls a generic
function G[T], we may need to call CanInline on G[T].
While here, we can also take advantage of the fact that we know G[T]
was already seen and compiled in an imported package, so we don't need
to call InlineCalls or add it to typecheck.Target.Decls. This saves us
from wasting compile time re-creating DUPOK symbols that we know
already exist in the imported package's link objects.
Fixes#56280.
Change-Id: I3336786bee01616ee9f2b18908738e4ca41c8102
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/443535
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
ISEL is roughly equivalent to CMOV on PPC64. Verify ISEL generation
in all reasonable cases.
Note "ISEL test x y z" is the same as "ISEL !test y x z". test is
always one of LT (0), GT (1), EQ (2), SO (3). Sometimes x and y are
swapped if GE/LE/NE is desired.
Change-Id: Ie1bf029224064e004d855099731fe5e8d05aa990
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/445215
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Prior to Go 1.18, ineffectual //go:linkname directives (i.e.,
directives referring to an undeclared name, or to a declared type or
constant) were treated as noops. In Go 1.18, we changed this into a
compiler error to mitigate accidental misuse.
However, the x/sys repo contained ineffectual //go:linkname directives
up until go.dev/cl/274573, which has caused a lot of user confusion.
It seems a bit late to worry about now, but to at least prevent
further user pain, this CL changes the error message to only apply to
modules using "go 1.18" or newer. (The x/sys repo declared "go 1.12"
at the time go.dev/cl/274573 was submitted.)
Fixes#55889.
Change-Id: Id762fff96fd13ba0f1e696929a9e276dfcba2620
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/447755
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
This needs to be as low as possible while not breaking priority
assumptions of other scores to correctly schedule carry chains.
Prior to the arm64 changes, it was set below ReadTuple. At the time,
this prevented the MulHiLo implementation on PPC64 from occluding
the scheduling of a full carry chain.
Memory scores can also prevent better scheduling, as can be observed
with crypto/internal/edwards25519/field.feMulGeneric.
Fixes#56497
Change-Id: Ia4b54e6dffcce584faf46b1b8d7cea18a3913887
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/447435
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The go1 benchmark suite does a lot of work at package init time, which
makes it take quite a while to run even if you're not running any of
the benchmarks, or if you're only running a subset of them. This leads
to an awkward workaround in dist test to compile but not run the
package, unlike roughly all other packages. It also reduces isolation
between benchmarks by affecting the starting heap size of all
benchmarks.
Fix this by initializing all data required by a benchmark when that
benchmark runs, and keeping it local so it gets freed by the GC and
doesn't leak between benchmarks. Now, none of the benchmarks depend on
global state.
Re-initializing the data on each benchmark run does add overhead to an
actual benchmark run, as each benchmark function is called several
times with different values of b.N. A full run of all benchmarks at
the default -benchtime=1s now takes ~10% longer; higher -benchtimes
would be less. It would be quite difficult to cache this data between
invocations of the same benchmark function without leaking between
different benchmarks and affecting GC overheads, as the testing
package doesn't provide any mechanism for this.
This reduces the time to run the binary with no benchmarks from 1.5
seconds to 10 ms, and also reduces the memory required to do this from
342 MiB to 17 MiB.
To make sure data was not leaking between different benchmarks, I ran
the benchmarks with -shuffle=on. The variance remained low: mostly
under 3%. A few benchmarks had higher variance, but in all cases it
was similar to the variance between this change.
This CL naturally changes the measured performance of several of the
benchmarks because it dramatically changes the heap size and hence GC
overheads. However, going forward the benchmarks should be much better
isolated.
For #37486.
Change-Id: I252ebea703a9560706cc1990dc5ad22d1927c7a0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/443336
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
The recently added rule only works before decomposing slices.
Add a rule that works after decomposing slices.
The reason we need the latter is because although the length may
be a constant, it can be hidden inside a slice that is not constant
(its pointer or capacity might be changing). By applying this
optimization after decomposing slices, we can find more cases
where it applies.
Fixes#56440
Change-Id: I0094e59eee3065ab4d210defdda8227a6e897420
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/446277
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Fixes a performance regression due to CL 418554.
Fixes#56440
Change-Id: I6ff152e9b83084756363f49ee6b0844a7a284880
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/445875
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Error messages currently print floats with %.6g, which means that if
you tried to convert something close to, but not quite, an integer, to
an integer, the error you get looks like "cannot convert 1 to type
int", when really you want "cannot convert 0.9999999 to type int".
Add more digits to floats when printing them, to make it clear that they
aren't quite integers. This helps for errors which are the result of not
being an integer. For other errors, it won't hurt much.
Fixes#56220
Change-Id: I7f5873af5993114a61460ef399d15316925a15a5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/442935
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Replace all uses of Ctz64/32/8 with TrailingZeros64/32/8, because they
are the same and maybe duplicated. Also renamed CtzXX functions in 386
assembly code.
Change-Id: I19290204858083750f4be589bb0923393950ae6d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/438935
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Using importcfg instead of depending on the existence of .a files for
standard library packages will enable us to remove the .a files in a
future cl.
Change-Id: I6108384224508bc37d82fd990fc4a8649222502c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/440222
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
fakePC uses hash.Sum32, which returns an uint32. However, libfuzzer
trace/hook functions declare fakePC argument as int, causing overflow on
386 archs.
Fixing this by changing fakePC argument to uint to prevent the overflow.
Fixes#56141
Change-Id: I3994c461319983ab70065f90bf61539a363e0a2a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/441996
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
For #56109
Change-Id: I999763e463fac57732a92f5e396f8fa8c35bd2e1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/440297
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
CL 403995 fixed static init of literal contains dynamic exprs, by
ensuring their init are ordered properly. However, we still need to walk
the generated init codes before appending to parent init. Otherwise,
codes that requires desugaring will be unhandled, causing the compiler
backend crashing.
Fixes#56105
Change-Id: Ic25fd4017473f5412c8e960a91467797a234edfd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/440455
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
For example:
movb a0, a0
srai $1, a0, a0
the assembler will expand to:
slli $56, a0, a0
srai $56, a0, a0
srai $1, a0, a0
this CL optimize to:
slli $56, a0, a0
srai $57, a0, a0
Remove 270+ instructions from Go binary on linux/riscv64.
Change-Id: I375e19f9d3bd54f2781791d8cbe5970191297dc8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/428496
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Wayne Zuo <wdvxdr@golangcn.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This is the last failed test in Unified IR, since it can inline f5 and
f6 but the old frontend can not. So marking them as //go:noinline, with
a TODO for re-enable once GOEXPERIMENT=nounified is gone.
Fixes#53058
Change-Id: Ifbbc49c87997a53e1b323048f0067f0257655fad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/437217
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
The mismatch between Unified IR and the old frontend is not about how
they number the closures, but how they name them. For nested closure,
the old frontend use the immediate function which contains the closure
as the outer function, while Unified IR uses the outer most function as
the outer for all closures.
That said, what important is matching the number of closures, not their
name prefix. So this CL relax the test to match both "main.func1.func2"
and "main.func1.2" to satisfy both Unified IR and the old frontend.
Updates #53058
Change-Id: I66ed816d1968aa68dd3089a4ea5850ba30afd75b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/437216
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
The linker needs FuncInfo metadata for all inlined functions. This is
typically handled by gc.enqueueFunc calling ir.InitLSym for all function
declarations in typecheck.Target.Decls (ir.UseClosure adds all closures
to Decls).
However, non-trivial closures in Decls are ignored, and are insteaded
enqueued when walk of the calling function discovers them.
This presents a problem for direct calls to closures. Inlining will
replace the entire closure definition with its body, which hides the
closure from walk and thus suppresses symbol creation.
Explicitly create a symbol early in this edge case to ensure we keep
this metadata.
InitLSym needs to move out of ssagen to avoid a circular dependency (it
doesn't have anything to do with ssa anyway). There isn't a great place
for it, so I placed it in ir, which seemed least objectionable.
The added test triggers one of these inlined direct non-trivial closure
calls, though the test needs CL 429637 to fail, which adds a FuncInfo
assertion to the linker. Note that the test must use "run" instead of
"compile" since the assertion is in the linker, and "compiler" doesn't
run the linker.
Fixes#54959.
Change-Id: I0bd1db4f3539a78da260934cd968372b7aa92546
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/436240
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
If a cycle has length 1, don't enumerate the single cycle entry;
instead just mention "refers to itself". For instance, for an
invalid recursive type T we now report:
invalid recursive type: T refers to itself
instead of:
invalid recursive type T
T refers to
T
Adjust tests to check for the different error messages.
Change-Id: I5bd46f62fac0cf167f0d0c9a55f952981d294ff4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/436295
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
This matches what go/types and types2 report and it also matches
the compiler errors reported for some related shift problems.
For #55326.
Change-Id: Iee40e8d988d5a7f9ff2c49f019884d02485c9fdf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/436177
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This is close to what the compiler used to say, except now we say
"as T value" rather than "as type T" which is closer to the truth
(we cannot use a value as a type, after all). Also, place the primary
error and the explanation (cause) on a single line.
Make respective (single line) adjustment to the matching "cannot
convert" error.
Adjust various tests.
For #55326.
Change-Id: Ib646cf906b11f4129b7ed0c38cf16471f9266b88
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/436176
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Compromise between old compiler error "T.m redeclared in this block"
(where the "in this block" is not particularly helpful) and the old
type-checker error "method m already declared for type T ...".
In the case where we have position information for the original
declaration, the error message is "method T.m already declared at
<position>". The new message is both shorter and more precise.
For #55326.
Change-Id: Id4a7f326fe631b11db9e8030eccb417c72d6c7db
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/435016
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
This is a compromise of the error reported by the compiler (quotes
around field name removed) and the error reported by the type checkers
(added mention of struct type).
For #55326.
Change-Id: Iac4fb5c717f17c6713e90d327d39e68d3be40074
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/434815
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
This matches longstanding compiler behavior.
Also, for unused packages, report:
`"pkg" imported and not used`
`"pkg" imported as X and not used`
This matches the other `X declared and not used` errors.
For #55326.
Change-Id: Ie71cf662fb5f4648449c64fc51bede298a1bdcbf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/432557
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Partial overlaps can only happen for strict sub-pieces of larger arrays.
That's a much stronger condition than the current optimization rules.
Update #54467
Change-Id: I11e539b71099e50175f37ee78fddf69283f83ee5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/433056
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
1. replace [0-9] with \d in regexps
2. replace [a-zA-Z0-9_] with \w in regexps
Change-Id: I9e260538252a0c1071e76aeb1c5f885c6843a431
GitHub-Last-Rev: 286e1a4619
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#54874
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/428435
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
For #55326
Change-Id: I3d0ff7f820f7b2009d1b226abf701b2337fe8cbc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/432635
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: xie cui <523516579@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
This CL adds some optimizaion rules:
1, Converts CMP to CMN, or vice versa, when comparing with a negative
number.
2, For equal and not equal comparisons, CMP can be converted to CMN in
some cases. In theory we could do the same optimization for LT, LE, GT
and GE, but need to account for overflow, this CL doesn't handle them.
There are no noticeable performance changes.
Change-Id: Ia49266c019ab7908ebc9510c2f02e121b1607869
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/429795
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Eric Fang <eric.fang@arm.com>
The nounified frontend currently tries to construct dictionaries that
correspond to invalid instantiations (i.e., instantiations T[X] where
X does not satisfy the constraints specified on T's type parameter).
As a consequence, we may fail to find method expressions needed by the
dictionary.
The real fix for this is to avoid creating those dictionaries in the
first place, because they should never actually be needed at runtime.
But that seems scary for a backport: we've repeatedly attempted to
backport generics fixes, which have fixed one issue but introduced
another.
This CL is a minimally invasive solution to #54225, which avoids the
ICE by instead skipping emitting the invalid dictionary. If the
dictionary ends up not being needed (which I believe will always be
the case), then the linker's reachability analysis will simply ignore
its absence.
Or worst case, if the dictionary *is* reachable somehow, we've simply
turned an ICE into a link-time missing symbol failure. That's not
great for user experience, but it seems like a small trade off to
avoid risking breaking any other currently working code.
Updates #54225.
Change-Id: Ic379696079f4729b1dd6a66994a58cca50281a84
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/429655
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
The conversion T(x) is implemented as *(*T)(x). Accordingly, runtime
panic messages for (*T)(x) are made more general.
Fixes#46505.
Change-Id: I76317c0878b6a5908299506d392eed50d7ef6523
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/430415
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jenny Rakoczy <jenny@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This test case already works with GOEXPERIMENT=unified, and it never
worked with Go 1.18 or Go 1.19. So this CL simply adds a regress test
to make sure it continues working.
Fixes#55101.
Change-Id: I7e06bfdc136ce124f65cdcf02d20a1050b841d42
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/431455
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
The type of the source and destination of a memmove call isn't
always accurate. It will always be a pointer (or an unsafe.Pointer), but
the base type might not be accurate. This comes about because multiple
copies of a pointer with different base types are coalesced into a single value.
In the failing example, the IData selector of the input argument is a
*[32]byte in one branch of the type switch, and a *[]byte in the other branch.
During the expand_calls pass both IDatas become just copies of the input
register. Those copies are deduped and an arbitrary one wins (in this case,
*[]byte is the unfortunate winner).
Generally an op v can rely on v.Type during rewrite rules. But relying
on v.Args[i].Type is discouraged.
Fixes#55122
Change-Id: I348fd9accf2058a87cd191eec01d39cda612f120
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/431496
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Now we have 8-byte alignment types on 32-bit system, so in some rare
case, e.g, generated wrapper for embedded interface, the function
argument may need more than 4 byte alignment. We could pad somehow, but
this is a rare case which makes it hard to ensure that we've got it right.
So relaxing the check for argument and return value region of the stack.
Fixes#54991
Change-Id: I34986e17a920254392a39439ad3dcb323da2ea8d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/431098
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
When SLTI/SLTIU is used with ANDI/ORI, it may be possible to determine the
outcome based on the values of the immediates. Resolve these cases.
Improves code generation for various shift operations.
While here, sort tests by architecture to improve readability and ease
future maintenance.
Change-Id: I87e71e016a0e396a928e7d6389a2df61583dfd8d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/428217
Reviewed-by: Wayne Zuo <wdvxdr@golangcn.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Jenny Rakoczy <jenny@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jenny Rakoczy <jenny@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Jenny Rakoczy <jenny@golang.org>
Go 1.19 introduce new append-like APIs in package encoding/binary, this
change teaches the inliner to treat calls to these methods as cheap, so
that code using them will be more inlineable.
Updates #42958
Change-Id: Ie3dd4906e285430f435bdedbf8a11fdffce9302d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/431015
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Jenny Rakoczy <jenny@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jenny Rakoczy <jenny@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Jenny Rakoczy <jenny@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Wayne Zuo <wdvxdr@golangcn.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
This CL adds shiftIsBounded checks for the Lsh* and Rsh* rules in arm64.
There is no need to check the shift value again with CMP + CSEL when the
shift value is valid.
Change-Id: I54620de64f02a1b5a11089add237248ae2de01b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/417714
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
When naming case variables, the unified frontend was using
typecheck.Lookup, which uses the current package, rather than
localIdent, which uses the package the variable was originally
declared in. When inlining across package boundaries, this could cause
the case variables to be associated with the wrong package.
In practice, I don't believe this has any negative consequences, but
it's inconsistent and triggered an ICE in typecheck.ClosureType, which
expected all captured variables to be declared in the same package.
Easy fix is to ensure case variables are declared in the correct
package by using localIdent.
Fixes#54912.
Change-Id: I7a429c708ad95723f46a67872cb0cf0c53a6a0d6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/428918
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Benny Siegert <bsiegert@gmail.com>
The unified frontend ICEs when inlining a function that contains a
function literal, which captures both a type switch case variable and
another variable.
Updates #54912.
Change-Id: I0e16d371ed5df48a70823beb0bf12110a5a17266
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/428917
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
The toStringData test was meant to test reflect.StringHeader, not
reflect.SliceHeader. It's not supported to convert *string to
*reflect.SliceHeader anyway.
Change-Id: Iaa4912eafd241886c6337bd7607cdf2412a15ead
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/428995
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
It was fixed by CL 422196, and have been already worked in unified IR.
Fixes#54911
Change-Id: Ie69044a64b296f6961e667e7661d8c4d1a24d84e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/428758
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
