When the input or SAN dNSNames are not valid hostnames, the specs don't
define what should happen, because this should ideally never happen, so
everything we do is undefined behavior. Browsers get to just return an
error, because browsers can assume that the resolving layer is DNS. We
can't, names can be resolved by anything implementing a Dial function,
and the crypto/x509 APIs can also be used directly without actual
networks in sight.
Trying to process invalid hostnames leads to issues like #27591 where
wildcards glob stuff they aren't expected to, because wildcards are only
defined on hostnames.
Try to rationalize the behavior like this: if both the VerifyHostname
input and the SAN dNSNames are a valid hostname, follow the specs;
otherwise, only accept perfect 1:1 case-insensitive matches (without
wildcards or trailing dot processing).
This should allow us to keep supporting weird names, with less
unexpected side-effects from undefined behavior. Also, it's a rule, even
if completely made up, so something we can reason about and code against.
The commonName field does allow any string, but no specs define how to
process it. Processing it differently from dNSNames would be confusing,
and allowing it to match invalid hostnames is incompatible with Name
Constraint processing (#24151).
This does encourage invalid dNSNames, regrettably, but we need some way
for the standard API to match weird names, and the alternative of
keeping CN alive sounds less appealing.
Fixes#27591
Change-Id: Id2d515f068a17ff796a32b30733abe44ad4f0339
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/231378
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
If dst slice length is zero in makeslicecopy then the called mallocgc is
using a fast path to only return a pointer to runtime.zerobase.
There may be no heapBits for that address readable by
bulkBarrierPreWriteSrcOnly which will cause a panic.
Protect against this by not calling bulkBarrierPreWriteSrcOnly if
there is nothing to copy. This is the case for all cases where the
length of the destination slice is zero.
runtime.growslice and runtime.typedslicecopy have fast paths that
do not call bulkBarrierPreWrite for zero copy lengths either.
Fixes#38929
Change-Id: I78ece600203a0a8d24de5b6c9eef56f605d44e99
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/232800
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Missed in CL 221790
This is the only remaining use of math.Float64frombits in the .rules
file that isn't already guarded.
Fixes#38880
Change-Id: I11f71e3a48516748d8d2701c6cf6920a7bc9e216
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/232859
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Currently linearAlloc manages an exclusive "end" address for the top of
its reserved space. While unlikely for a linearAlloc to be allocated
with an "end" address hitting the top of the address space, it is
possible and could lead to overflow.
Avoid overflow by chopping off the last byte from the linearAlloc if
it's bumping up against the top of the address space defensively. In
practice, this means that if 32-bit platforms map the top of the address
space and use the linearAlloc to acquire arenas, the top arena will not
be usable.
Fixes#35954.
Change-Id: I512cddcd34fd1ab15cb6ca92bbf899fc1ef22ff6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/231338
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Currently when checking if we can grow the heap into the current arena,
we do an addition which may overflow. This is particularly likely on
32-bit systems.
Avoid this situation by explicitly checking for overflow, and adding in
some comments about when overflow is possible, when it isn't, and why.
For #35954.
Change-Id: I2d4ecbb1ccbd43da55979cc721f0cd8d1757add2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/231337
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
I added routines that can acquire/release a particular rank without
acquiring/releasing an associated lock. I added lockRankGscan as a rank
for acquiring/releasing the Gscan bit.
castogscanstatus() and casGtoPreemptScan() are acquires of the Gscan
bit. casfrom_Gscanstatus() is a release of the Gscan bit. casgstatus()
is like an acquire and release of the Gscan bit, since it will wait if
Gscan bit is currently set.
We have a cycle between hchan and Gscan. The acquisition of Gscan and
then hchan only happens in syncadjustsudogs() when the G is suspended,
so the main normal ordering (get hchan, then get Gscan) can't be
happening. So, I added a new rank lockRankHchanLeaf that is used when
acquiring hchan locks in syncadjustsudogs. This ranking is set so no
other locks can be acquired except other hchan locks.
Fixes#38922
Change-Id: I58ce526a74ba856cb42078f7b9901f2832e1d45c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/228417
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Fix a minor bug where it should use Textp2 instead of Textp. This
doesn't affect correctness. It just made the pre-allocation less
effective.
Change-Id: Ib3fa8ab3c64037e3582933970d051f278286353b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/232837
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Faller <jeremy@golang.org>
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Hello, if you are reading this and run macOS, please test this code: |
| |
| $ GO111MODULE=on go get golang.org/dl/gotip@latest |
| $ gotip download |
| $ GODEBUG=x509roots=1 gotip test crypto/x509 -v -run TestSystemRoots |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
We currently have two code paths to extract system roots on macOS: one
uses cgo to invoke a maze of Security.framework APIs; the other is a
horrible fallback that runs "/usr/bin/security verify-cert" on every
root that has custom policies to check if it's trusted for SSL.
The fallback is not only terrifying because it shells out to a binary,
but also because it lets in certificates that are not trusted roots but
are signed by trusted roots, and because it applies some filters (EKUs
and expiration) only to roots with custom policies, as the others are
not passed to verify-cert. The other code path, of course, requires cgo,
so can't be used when cross-compiling and involves a large ball of C.
It's all a mess, and it broke oh-so-many times (#14514, #16532, #19436,
#20990, #21416, #24437, #24652, #25649, #26073, #27958, #28025, #28092,
#29497, #30471, #30672, #30763, #30889, #32891, #38215, #38365, ...).
Since macOS does not have a stable syscall ABI, we already dynamically
link and invoke libSystem.dylib regardless of cgo availability (#17490).
How that works is that functions in package syscall (like syscall.Open)
take the address of assembly trampolines (like libc_open_trampoline)
that jump to symbols imported with cgo_import_dynamic (like libc_open),
and pass them along with arguments to syscall.syscall (which is
implemented as runtime.syscall_syscall). syscall_syscall informs the
scheduler and profiler, and then uses asmcgocall to switch to a system
stack and invoke runtime.syscall. The latter is an assembly trampoline
that unpacks the Go ABI arguments passed to syscall.syscall, finally
calls the remote function, and puts the return value on the Go stack.
(This last bit is the part that cgo compiles from a C wrapper.)
We can do something similar to link and invoke Security.framework!
The one difference is that runtime.syscall and friends check errors
based on the errno convention, which Security doesn't follow, so I added
runtime.syscallNoErr which just skips interpreting the return value.
We only need a variant with six arguments because the calling convention
is register-based, and extra arguments simply zero out some registers.
That's plumbed through as crypto/x509/internal/macOS.syscall. The rest
of that package is a set of wrappers for Security.framework and Core
Foundation functions, like syscall is for libSystem. In theory, as long
as macOS respects ABI backwards compatibility (a.k.a. as long as
binaries built for a previous OS version keep running) this should be
stable, as the final result is not different from what a C compiler
would make. (One exception might be dictionary key strings, which we
make our own copy of instead of using the dynamic symbol. If they change
the value of those strings things might break. But why would they.)
Finally, I rewrote the crypto/x509 cgo logic in Go using those wrappers.
It works! I tried to make it match 1:1 the old logic, so that
root_darwin_amd64.go can be reviewed by comparing it to
root_cgo_darwin_amd64.go. The only difference is that we do proper error
handling now, and assume that if there is no error the return values are
there, while before we'd just check for nil pointers and move on.
I kept the cgo logic to help with review and testing, but we should
delete it once we are confident the new code works.
The nocgo logic is gone and we shall never speak of it again.
Fixes#32604Fixes#19561Fixes#38365
Awakens Cthulhu
Change-Id: Id850962bad667f71e3af594bdfebbbb1edfbcbb4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/227037
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Also encode the certificates in a way that's more
consistent with TLS 1.3 (with a 24 byte length prefix).
Note that this will have an additional performance cost
requiring clients to do a full handshake every 7 days
where previously they were able to use the same ticket
indefinitely.
Updates #25256
Change-Id: Ic4d1ba0d92773c490b33b5f6c1320d557cc7347d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/231317
Run-TryBot: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
We might as well grow the stack at least as large as we'll need for
the frame that is calling morestack. It doesn't help with the
lots-of-small-frames case, but it may help a bit with the
few-big-frames case.
Update #18138
Change-Id: I1f49c97706a70e20b30433cbec99a7901528ea52
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/225800
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
match:
m = make([]T, x); copy(m, s)
for pointer free T and x==len(s) rewrite to:
m = mallocgc(x*elemsize(T), nil, false); memmove(&m, &s, x*elemsize(T))
otherwise rewrite to:
m = makeslicecopy([]T, x, s)
This avoids memclear and shading of pointers in the newly created slice
before the copy.
With this CL "s" is only be allowed to bev a variable and not a more
complex expression. This restriction could be lifted in future versions
of this optimization when it can be proven that "s" is not referencing "m".
Triggers 450 times during make.bash..
Reduces go binary size by ~8 kbyte.
name old time/op new time/op delta
MakeSliceCopy/mallocmove/Byte 71.1ns ± 1% 65.8ns ± 0% -7.49% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
MakeSliceCopy/mallocmove/Int 71.2ns ± 1% 66.0ns ± 0% -7.27% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
MakeSliceCopy/mallocmove/Ptr 104ns ± 4% 99ns ± 1% -5.13% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MakeSliceCopy/makecopy/Byte 70.3ns ± 0% 68.0ns ± 0% -3.22% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
MakeSliceCopy/makecopy/Int 70.3ns ± 0% 68.5ns ± 1% -2.59% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
MakeSliceCopy/makecopy/Ptr 102ns ± 0% 99ns ± 1% -2.97% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
MakeSliceCopy/nilappend/Byte 75.4ns ± 0% 74.9ns ± 2% -0.63% (p=0.015 n=9+9)
MakeSliceCopy/nilappend/Int 75.6ns ± 0% 76.4ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.245 n=9+10)
MakeSliceCopy/nilappend/Ptr 107ns ± 0% 108ns ± 1% +0.93% (p=0.005 n=9+10)
Fixes#26252
Change-Id: Iec553dd1fef6ded16197216a472351c8799a8e71
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/146719
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Speed up repeated HMAC operations with the same key by not recomputing
the first block of the inner and outer hashes in Reset and Sum, saving
two block computations each time.
This is a significant win for applications which hash many small
messages with the same key. In x/crypto/pbkdf2 for example, this
optimization cuts the number of block computations in half, speeding it
up by 25%-40% depending on the hash function.
The hash function needs to implement binary.Marshaler and
binary.Unmarshaler for this optimization to work, so that we can save
and restore its internal state. All hash functions in the standard
library are marshalable (CL 66710) but if the hash isn't marshalable, we
fall back on the old behaviour.
Marshaling the hashes does add a couple unavoidable new allocations, but
this only has to be done once, so the cost is amortized over repeated
uses. To minimize impact to applications which don't (or can't) reuse
hmac objects, marshaling is performed in Reset (rather than in New),
since calling Reset seems like a good indication that the caller intends
to reuse the hmac object later.
I had to add a boolean field to the hmac state to remember if we've
marshaled the hashes or not. This is paid for by removing the size and
blocksize fields, which were basically unused except for some
initialization work in New, and to fulfill the Size and Blocksize
methods. Size and Blocksize can just be forwarded to the underlying
hash, so there doesn't really seem to be any reason to waste space
caching their values.
crypto/hmac benchmarks:
name old time/op new time/op delta
HMAC_Reset/SHA1/1K-2 4.06µs ± 0% 3.77µs ± 0% -7.29% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
HMAC_Reset/SHA1/32-2 1.08µs ± 0% 0.78µs ± 1% -27.67% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
HMAC_Reset/SHA256/1K-2 10.3µs ± 0% 9.4µs ± 0% -9.03% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
HMAC_Reset/SHA256/32-2 2.32µs ± 0% 1.42µs ± 0% -38.87% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
HMAC_Reset/SHA512/1K-2 8.22µs ± 0% 7.04µs ± 0% -14.32% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
HMAC_Reset/SHA512/32-2 3.08µs ± 0% 1.89µs ± 0% -38.54% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
HMAC_New/SHA1/1K-2 4.86µs ± 1% 4.93µs ± 1% +1.30% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
HMAC_New/SHA1/32-2 1.91µs ± 1% 1.95µs ± 1% +1.84% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
HMAC_New/SHA256/1K-2 11.2µs ± 1% 11.2µs ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=9+10)
HMAC_New/SHA256/32-2 3.22µs ± 2% 3.19µs ± 2% -1.07% (p=0.018 n=9+10)
HMAC_New/SHA512/1K-2 9.54µs ± 0% 9.66µs ± 1% +1.31% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
HMAC_New/SHA512/32-2 4.37µs ± 1% 4.46µs ± 1% +1.97% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
name old speed new speed delta
HMAC_Reset/SHA1/1K-2 252MB/s ± 0% 272MB/s ± 0% +7.86% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
HMAC_Reset/SHA1/32-2 29.7MB/s ± 0% 41.1MB/s ± 1% +38.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
HMAC_Reset/SHA256/1K-2 99.1MB/s ± 0% 108.9MB/s ± 0% +9.93% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
HMAC_Reset/SHA256/32-2 13.8MB/s ± 0% 22.6MB/s ± 0% +63.57% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
HMAC_Reset/SHA512/1K-2 125MB/s ± 0% 145MB/s ± 0% +16.71% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
HMAC_Reset/SHA512/32-2 10.4MB/s ± 0% 16.9MB/s ± 0% +62.69% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
HMAC_New/SHA1/1K-2 211MB/s ± 1% 208MB/s ± 1% -1.29% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
HMAC_New/SHA1/32-2 16.7MB/s ± 1% 16.4MB/s ± 1% -1.81% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
HMAC_New/SHA256/1K-2 91.3MB/s ± 1% 91.5MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.950 n=9+10)
HMAC_New/SHA256/32-2 9.94MB/s ± 2% 10.04MB/s ± 2% +1.09% (p=0.021 n=9+10)
HMAC_New/SHA512/1K-2 107MB/s ± 0% 106MB/s ± 1% -1.29% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
HMAC_New/SHA512/32-2 7.32MB/s ± 1% 7.18MB/s ± 1% -1.89% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
HMAC_Reset/SHA1/1K-2 0.00B ±NaN% 0.00B ±NaN% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_Reset/SHA1/32-2 0.00B ±NaN% 0.00B ±NaN% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_Reset/SHA256/1K-2 0.00B ±NaN% 0.00B ±NaN% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_Reset/SHA256/32-2 0.00B ±NaN% 0.00B ±NaN% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_Reset/SHA512/1K-2 0.00B ±NaN% 0.00B ±NaN% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_Reset/SHA512/32-2 0.00B ±NaN% 0.00B ±NaN% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_New/SHA1/1K-2 448B ± 0% 448B ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_New/SHA1/32-2 448B ± 0% 448B ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_New/SHA256/1K-2 480B ± 0% 480B ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_New/SHA256/32-2 480B ± 0% 480B ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_New/SHA512/1K-2 800B ± 0% 800B ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_New/SHA512/32-2 800B ± 0% 800B ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
HMAC_Reset/SHA1/1K-2 0.00 ±NaN% 0.00 ±NaN% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_Reset/SHA1/32-2 0.00 ±NaN% 0.00 ±NaN% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_Reset/SHA256/1K-2 0.00 ±NaN% 0.00 ±NaN% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_Reset/SHA256/32-2 0.00 ±NaN% 0.00 ±NaN% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_Reset/SHA512/1K-2 0.00 ±NaN% 0.00 ±NaN% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_Reset/SHA512/32-2 0.00 ±NaN% 0.00 ±NaN% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_New/SHA1/1K-2 5.00 ± 0% 5.00 ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_New/SHA1/32-2 5.00 ± 0% 5.00 ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_New/SHA256/1K-2 5.00 ± 0% 5.00 ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_New/SHA256/32-2 5.00 ± 0% 5.00 ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_New/SHA512/1K-2 5.00 ± 0% 5.00 ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
HMAC_New/SHA512/32-2 5.00 ± 0% 5.00 ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
x/crypto/pbkdf2 benchmarks:
name old time/op new time/op delta
HMACSHA1-2 4.63ms ± 0% 3.40ms ± 0% -26.58% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
HMACSHA256-2 9.75ms ± 0% 5.98ms ± 0% -38.62% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
HMACSHA1-2 516B ± 0% 708B ± 0% +37.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
HMACSHA256-2 549B ± 0% 772B ± 0% +40.62% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
HMACSHA1-2 8.00 ± 0% 10.00 ± 0% +25.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
HMACSHA256-2 8.00 ± 0% 10.00 ± 0% +25.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Fixes#19941
Change-Id: I7077a6f875be68d3da05f7b3664e18514861886f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/27458
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
The code writes text sections twice, one with Codeblk, one with
Datblk. The second write shouldn't be there.
May fix#38898.
Change-Id: I4ec70294059ec9aa0fc4cc69a3cd824f5843287b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/232661
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Faller <jeremy@golang.org>
Reject base 128 encoded integers that aren't using minimal encoding,
specifically if the leading octet of an encoded integer is 0x80. This
only affects parsing of tags and OIDs, both of which expect this
encoding (see X.690 8.1.2.4.2 and 8.19.2).
Fixes#36881
Change-Id: I969cf48ac1fba7e56bac334672806a0784d3e123
GitHub-Last-Rev: fefc03d202
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#38281
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/227320
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The previous behavior directly contradicted the docs that have been in
place for years:
To unmarshal a JSON array into a slice, Unmarshal resets the
slice length to zero and then appends each element to the slice.
We could use reflect.New to create a new element and reflect.Append to
then append it to the destination slice, but benchmarks have shown that
reflect.Append is very slow compared to the code that manually grows a
slice in this file.
Instead, if we're decoding into an element that came from the original
backing array, zero it before decoding into it. We're going to be using
the CodeDecoder benchmark, as it has a slice of struct pointers that's
decoded very often.
Note that we still reuse existing values from arrays being decoded into,
as the documentation agrees with the existing implementation in that
case:
To unmarshal a JSON array into a Go array, Unmarshal decodes
JSON array elements into corresponding Go array elements.
The numbers with the benchmark as-is might seem catastrophic, but that's
only because the benchmark is decoding into the same variable over and
over again. Since the old decoder was happy to reuse slice elements, it
would save a lot of allocations by not having to zero and re-allocate
said elements:
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 10.4ms ± 1% 10.9ms ± 1% +4.41% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 186MB/s ± 1% 178MB/s ± 1% -4.23% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 2.19MB ± 0% 3.59MB ± 0% +64.09% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 76.8k ± 0% 92.7k ± 0% +20.71% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
We can prove this by moving 'var r codeResponse' into the loop, so that
the benchmark no longer reuses the destination pointer. And sure enough,
we no longer see the slow-down caused by the extra allocations:
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 10.9ms ± 0% 10.9ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.043 n=10+10)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 177MB/s ± 0% 178MB/s ± 1% +0.37% (p=0.041 n=10+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 3.59MB ± 0% 3.59MB ± 0% ~ (p=0.780 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 92.7k ± 0% 92.7k ± 0% ~ (all equal)
I believe that it's useful to leave the benchmarks as they are now,
because the decoder does reuse memory in some cases. For example,
existing map elements are reused. However, subtle changes like this one
need to be benchmarked carefully.
Finally, add a couple of tests involving both a slice and an array of
structs.
Fixes#21092.
Change-Id: I8b1194f25e723a31abd146fbfe9428ac10c1389d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/191783
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The `yield := osyield` line doesn't serve any purpose, it's committed in `2015`, time to delete that line:)
Change-Id: I382d4d32cf320f054f011f3b6684c868cbcb0ff2
GitHub-Last-Rev: 7a0aa25e55
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#36078
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/210837
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This commit moves the isSelect bool below the ticket uint32. The
boolean was consuming 8 bytes of the struct. The uint32 was also
consuming 8 bytes, so we can pack isSelect below the uint32 and save 8
bytes. This reduces the sudog struct from 96 bytes to 88 bytes.
Change-Id: If555cdaf2f5eaa125e2590fc4d113dbc99750738
GitHub-Last-Rev: d63b4e086b
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#36552
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/214677
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Change-Id: I493bb7e5e9a9e1752236dea1e032b317da7f67f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/211560
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This CL sets positions for errors from cals to load within the load
call itself, similar to how the rest of the code in pkg.go sets
positions right after the error is set on the package.
This allows the code to ensure that we only add positions either for
ImportPathErrors, or if an error was passed into load, and was set
using setLoadPackageDataError. (Though I'm wondering if the call
to setLoadPackageDataError should be done before the call to load).
Fixes#38034
Change-Id: I0748866933b4c1a329954b4b96640bef702a4644
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/228784
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Being lenient on those has caused enough security issues.
Spun out of CL 231419.
Fixes#38889
Change-Id: Idd3bc6adc22e08a30b3dabb146ce78d4105684cd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/232277
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Before going around making changes, surface the current behavior in the
docs as a starting point. No behavior changes.
Change-Id: If8096cedbba7eda37694dbb7f438046d590c3bcc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/231377
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
This is a security hardening measure against HTTP request smuggling.
Thank you to ZeddYu for reporting this issue.
We weren't parsing things correctly anyway, allowing "identity" to be
combined with "chunked", and ignoring any Transfer-Encoding header past
the first. This is a delicate security surface that already broke
before, just be strict and don't add complexity to support cases not
observed in the wild (nginx removed "identity" support [1] and multiple
TE header support [2]) and removed by RFC 7230 (see page 81).
It'd probably be good to also drop support for anything other than
"chunked" in outbound TE headers, as "identity" is not a thing anymore,
and we are probably off-spec for anything other than "chunked", but it
should not be a security concern, so leaving it for now. See #38867.
[1]: https://hg.nginx.org/nginx/rev/fe5976aae0e3
[2]: https://hg.nginx.org/nginx/rev/aca005d232ff
Change-Id: If17d0827f9c6167a0b19a158e2bc5844ec803288
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/231418
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Clients have to reject any HelloRetryRequest message that doesn't lead
to a change in the ClientHello. Instead, we were rejecting any HRR that
didn't select an alternative group, even if it sent a cookie, which
would change the CH.
The good news is that I know of no TLS servers that use or need HRRs
exclusively for cookies (which are mostly useful in DTLS as a way to
verify the source address). The bad news is that we poisoned the
ecosystem as Go 1.12 to 1.14 will reject such HRRs. Oops, hopefully no
one needed this.
No tests because neither Go nor s_server support cookies. This would
presumably get covered once we integrate BoGo.
Fixes#30149
Change-Id: I760fb1ded81148ac3096cf201cbc1e941374b83d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/231039
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Following CL 208126, do the same for MIPS.
Change-Id: I95f8fc99a234524119a4d29c7695676dc0ea1025
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/208217
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
On some architectures, for async preemption the injected call
needs to clobber a register (usually REGTMP) in order to return
to the preempted function. As a consequence, the PC ranges where
REGTMP is live are not preemptible.
The uses of REGTMP are usually generated by the assembler, where
it needs to load or materialize a large constant or offset that
doesn't fit into the instruction. In those cases, REGTMP is not
live at the start of the instruction sequence. Instead of giving
up preemption in those cases, we could preempt it and restart the
sequence when resuming the execution. Basically, this is like
reissuing an interrupted instruction, except that here the
"instruction" is a Prog that consists of multiple machine
instructions. For this to work, we need to generate PC data to
mark the start of the Prog.
Currently this is only done for ARM64.
TODO: the split-stack function prologue is currently not async
preemptible. We could use this mechanism, preempt it and restart
at the function entry.
Change-Id: I37cb282f8e606e7ab6f67b3edfdc6063097b4bd1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/208126
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
There is a range of numbers lower than 0x7fff_ffff_ffff_ffff which
cannot be represented by a 64 bit float. We set that to the correct
limit beyond which conversions can happen properly.
It appears that the negative bound check can indeed by correctly handled
by I64TruncF64S. But we use the same limit for consistency.
Fixes#38839
Change-Id: Ib783a22cb331fba7e6955459f41c67f9ceb53461
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/231837
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Record the caller when Cleanup is called to report it with t.Log
instead of unhelpful line in testing.go.
Fixes#38800
Change-Id: I3136f5d92a0e5a48f8b32a2e13b2521bc91d72d1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/232237
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The {AND,OR,XOR}const ops can only take an int32 as an argument.
Make sure that when rewriting a BTx op to one of these, the result
has no high-order bits.
Fixes#38746
Change-Id: Ia7c5f76952329f60974bc033c29a5433610f3b28
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/231977
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Replaced almost every use of Bytes with FillBytes.
Note that the approved proposal was for
func (*Int) FillBytes(buf []byte)
while this implements
func (*Int) FillBytes(buf []byte) []byte
because the latter was far nicer to use in all callsites.
Fixes#35833
Change-Id: Ia912df123e5d79b763845312ea3d9a8051343c0a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230397
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The Go 1.15 code freeze has just started. This is the time to update
all golang.org/x/... module versions that contribute packages to the
std and cmd modules in the standard library to latest master versions.
Those versions have already gone through code review, and now they
will undergo additional testing during the freeze period.
If there are new issues in these dependencies discovered, we have
the freeze period to deal with that. By the end of the freeze period,
we will have confidence that the Go 1.15 release and the dependency
versions it has selected are robust.
If one of the Go 1.15.x minor releases requires changing code in one of
the vendored packages, we'll be able to do so on top of the versions
that are selected here, and not be forced to use versions that came
from different time periods, or try to jump across multiple untested
versions in a minor release.
The dependency versions that are selected in this commit are:
github.com/google/pprof v0.0.0-20200229191704-1ebb73c60ed3
github.com/ianlancetaylor/demangle v0.0.0-20200414190113-039b1ae3a340
golang.org/x/arch v0.0.0-20200312215426-ff8b605520f4
golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20200429183012-4b2356b1ed79
golang.org/x/mod v0.2.1-0.20200429172858-859b3ef565e2
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20200501053045-e0ff5e5a1de5
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20200501145240-bc7a7d42d5c3
golang.org/x/text v0.3.3-0.20200430171850-afb9336c4530
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20200504152539-33427f1b0364
golang.org/x/xerrors v0.0.0-20191204190536-9bdfabe68543
github.com/ianlancetaylor/demangle is considered in scope and updated.
github.com/google/pprof is out of scope and was not updated.
For #36905.
Change-Id: Icb6996eb0df11f16edd9a42e04434012c0336354
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/231657
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently, Value.Addr collapses flagRO, which is a combination of
flagEmbedRO and flagStickyRO, to flagStickyRO. This causes exported
fields of unexported anonymous field from Value.Addr.Elem read only.
This commit fix this by keeping all bits of flagRO from origin
value in Value.Addr. This should be safe due to following reasons:
* Result of Value.Addr is not CanSet because of it is not CanAddr
but not flagRO.
* Addr.Elem get same flagRO as origin, so it should behave same as
origin in CanSet.
Fixes#32772.
Change-Id: I79e086628c0fb6569a50ce63f3b95916f997eda1
GitHub-Last-Rev: 78e280e6d0
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#32787
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/183937
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
