We want to adjust the DIV calling convention to use m,
and usleep can be called without an m, so switch to a
multiplication by the reciprocal (and test).
Step toward a fix for #6699 and #10486.
Change-Id: Iccf76a18432d835e48ec64a2fa34a0e4d6d4b955
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12898
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This extends https://golang.org/cl/2811, which only applied to Darwin
and GNU/Linux, to all Unix systems.
Fixes#9591.
Change-Id: Iec3fb438564ba2924b15b447c0480f87c0bfd009
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12661
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently its possible for the garbage collector to observe
uninitialized memory or stale heap bitmap bits on weakly ordered
architectures such as ARM and PPC. On such architectures, the stores
that zero newly allocated memory and initialize its heap bitmap may
move after a store in user code that makes the allocated object
observable by the garbage collector.
To fix this, add a "publication barrier" (also known as an "export
barrier") before returning from mallocgc. This is a store/store
barrier that ensures any write done by user code that makes the
returned object observable to the garbage collector will be ordered
after the initialization performed by mallocgc. No barrier is
necessary on the reading side because of the data dependency between
loading the pointer and loading the contents of the object.
Fixes one of the issues raised in #9984.
Change-Id: Ia3d96ad9c5fc7f4d342f5e05ec0ceae700cd17c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11083
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Capitanio <capnm9@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Avoids shadowing the builtin channel close function.
Change-Id: I7a729b0937c8248fe27222be61318a88db995eee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8898
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
