Fixes#19223.
Change-Id: I4cc8e81559a1313e1477ee36902e1b653155a888
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37374
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
For some reason git won't let me write
doc/effective_go.html: reword confusing sentence
or even
doc/effective_go: reword confusing sentence
as the subject line for this CL, but that's not important. The
actual CL just rewrites one sentence and adds an option to grep in
the associated example.
Fixes#15875
Change-Id: Iee159ea751caf4b73eacf3dfc86e29032646373f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32110
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Effective Go has references to a function call f(c, req) made by ServeHTTP mixed with f(w,
req). c is dropped in favor of w to maintain consistency
Fixes#17128
Change-Id: I6746fd115ed5a58971fd24e54024d29d18ead1fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29311
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
New Gophers sometimes misconstrue the advice in the "Generality" section
as "export interfaces instead of implementations" and add needless
interfaces to their code as a result. Down the road, they end up
needing to add methods and either break existing callers or have to
resort to unpleasant hacks (e.g. using "magic method" type-switches).
Weaken the first paragraph of this section to only advise leaving types
unexported when they will never need additional methods.
Change-Id: I32a1ae44012b5896faf167c02e192398a4dfc0b8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24892
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Named returned values should only be used on public funcs and methods
when it contributes to the documentation.
Named return values should not be used if they're only saving the
programmer a few lines of code inside the body of the function,
especially if that means there's stutter in the documentation or it
was only there so the programmer could use a naked return
statement. (Naked returns should not be used except in very small
functions)
This change is a manual audit & cleanup of public func signatures.
Signatures were not changed if:
* the func was private (wouldn't be in public godoc)
* the documentation referenced it
* the named return value was an interesting name. (i.e. it wasn't
simply stutter, repeating the name of the type)
There should be no changes in behavior. (At least: none intended)
Change-Id: I3472ef49619678fe786e5e0994bdf2d9de76d109
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20024
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
In the Slices section of Effective Go, the os package's File.Read
function is used as an example. Unfortunately the function signature
does not match the function's code in the example, nor the os package's
documentation. This change updates the function signature to match
the os package and the pre-existing function code.
Change-Id: Iae9f30c898d3a1ff8d47558ca104dfb3ff07112c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9845
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
When printing the type of the function there was no newline printed in
case of unexpected type.
Change-Id: I5946413f0864f712a1b955f488b436793018e0e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/7480
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
This CL adjusts code referring to src/pkg to refer to src.
Immediately after submitting this CL, I will submit
a change doing 'hg mv src/pkg/* src'.
That change will be too large to review with Rietveld
but will contain only the 'hg mv'.
This CL will break the build.
The followup 'hg mv' will fix it.
For more about the move, see golang.org/s/go14nopkg.
LGTM=r
R=r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/134570043
golang.org now serves HTTPS with a valid cert, so it's reasonable
that users should click through to the HTTPS versions of *.golang.org
and other known sites.
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/112650043
Make it a little clearer how they are used, in particular that
it is not enough just to return a nil pointer on error, but also
to return an error value explaining the problem.
Fixes#1963.
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/97360045
Currently tip.golang.org leads to golang.org and
local godoc also leads to golang.org (when you don't have internet connectivity).
LGTM=crawshaw
R=golang-codereviews, crawshaw
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/100200043
The rewrite is due to Rob.
LGTM=r, bradfitz, josharian
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz, r, josharian
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/87410043
This rule not existing has been the source of many discussions
on golang-dev and on issues. We have stated publicly that it is
true, but we have never written it down. Write it down.
Fixes#6242.
LGTM=r, dan.kortschak, iant, dvyukov
R=golang-codereviews, r, dominik.honnef, dvyukov, dan.kortschak, iant, 0xjnml
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/75130045
Prose referred to 'b', code used 'buf'.
Fixes#7601.
LGTM=dominik.honnef
R=golang-codereviews, dominik.honnef
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/78470043
Needs to be an h3, not an h2.
Thanks to Mingjie Xing for pointing it out.
LGTM=dsymonds
R=golang-codereviews, dsymonds
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/55980046
At the moment, godoc expands the example in the link, but in
the past it has not. Add a waffle word to allow either possibility.
Also change the order of cases in the switch in Compare to
be consistent with the other switch in the function.
R=golang-dev, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/14439055
This fixes two intra-page "type assertion" links that were broken in
different ways.
R=golang-dev, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/9797043
Also rename the relevant examples and make sure the working one compiles.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz, adg, iant, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7597043
It's a common mistake to build a recursive String method; explain it well and
show how to avoid it.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz, adg
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7486049
Drop the phrase "reference types", which has caused confusion.
Add a section about 2D arrays, a common newbie question.
R=golang-dev, cespare, adg, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7423051
