The test for #18902 reads the assembly stream to be sure
that the line number does not change too often (this is an
indication that debugging the code will be unpleasant and
that the compiler is probably getting line numbers "wrong").
It checks that it is getting "enough" input, but the
compiler has gotten enough better since the test was written
that it now fails for lack of enough input. The old
threshould was 200 instructions, the new one is 150 (the
minimum observed input is on arm64 with 184 instructions).
Fixes#22494.
Change-Id: Ibba7e9ff4ab6a7be369e5dd5859d150b7db94653
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74357
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reuse block head or preceding instruction's line number for
register allocator's spill, fill, copy, rematerialization
instructionsl; and also for phi, and for no-src-pos
instructions. Assembler creates same line number tables
for copy-predecessor-line and for no-src-pos,
but copy-predecessor produces better-looking assembly
language output with -S and with GOSSAFUNC, and does not
require changes to tests of existing assembly language.
Split "copyInto" into two cases, one for register allocation,
one for otherwise. This caused the test score line change
count to increase by one, which may reflect legitimately
useful information preserved. Without any special treatment
for copyInto, the change count increases by 21 more, from
51 to 72 (i.e., quite a lot).
There is a test; using two naive "scores" for line number
churn, the old numbering is 2x or 4x worse.
Fixes#18902.
Change-Id: I0a0a69659d30ee4e5d10116a0dd2b8c5df8457b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36207
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
