The previous CL is the real fix. This one is just insurance.
Fixes#14046 again.
Change-Id: I553349504bb1789e4b66c888dbe4034568918ad6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18977
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
It was just completely broken if you gave it the number
of records it asked for. Make it impossible for that particular
inconsistency to happen again.
Also make it exclude system goroutines, to match both
NumGoroutine and Stack.
Fixes#14046.
Change-Id: Ic238c6b89934ba7b47cccd3440dd347ed11e4c3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18976
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
For Go 1.7 we can remove all the code.google.com code
(except maybe the shutdown warning).
See #10193.
Change-Id: I4b8182eb66494f0bf373b40ca5da6ae4738342be
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18974
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently p.gcBgMarkWorker is a *g. Change it to a guintptr. This
eliminates a write barrier during the subtle mark worker parking dance
(which isn't known to be causing problems, but may).
Change-Id: Ibf12c05ac910820448059e69a68e5b882c993ed8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18970
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
traceEvent records system call events after a G has already entered
_Gsyscall, which means the garbage collector could be installing stack
barriers in the G's stack during the traceEvent. If traceEvent
attempts to capture the user stack during this, it may observe a
inconsistent stack barriers and panic. Fix this by acquiring the stack
lock around the stack walk in traceEvent.
Fixes#14101.
Change-Id: I15f0ab0c70c04c6e182221f65a6f761c5a896459
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18973
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently mark workers attach to their designated Ps before parking,
either during initialization or after performing a phase transition.
However, in both of these cases, it's possible that the mark worker is
running on a different P than the one it attaches to. This is a
problem, because as soon as the worker attaches to a P, that P's
scheduler can execute the worker. If the worker hasn't yet parked on
the P it's actually running on, this means the worker G will be
running in two places at once. The most visible consequence of this is
that once the first instance of the worker does park, it will clear
g.m and the second instance will crash shortly when it tries to use
g.m.
Fix this by moving the attach to the gopark callback. At this point,
the G is genuinely stopped and the callback is running on the system
stack, so it's safe for another P's scheduler to pick up the worker G.
Fixes#13363. Fixes#13978.
Change-Id: If2f7c4a4174f9511f6227e14a27c56fb842d1cc8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18761
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
The current code delays the literal pool until the very last moment,
but based on the assumption that span-dependent jumps are as
short as possible. If they need to be enlarged in a later round, that
very last moment may be too late. Flush a little early to prevent that.
Fixes#13579.
Change-Id: I759b5db5c43a977bf2b940872870cbbc436ad141
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18972
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Clarify that Compressor and Decompressor callbacks must support being invoked
concurrently, but that the writer or reader returned need not be.
Updates #8359
Change-Id: Ia407b581dd124185f165c25f5701018a8ce4357a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18627
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This debugging print crept into an earlier CL of mine.
Change-Id: If6e8609e69a60aec50c06889c2d98a8b8a4bd02b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18971
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
In some cases the documentation for functions in this package was
lacking from the beginning and, in order cases, the documentation didn't
keep pace as the package grew.
This change somewhat addresses that.
Updates #13711.
Change-Id: I25b2bb1fcd4658c5417671e23cf8e644d08cb9ab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18486
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Fixes#13954
Change-Id: I4c01e9bb3fb08e8b9fa14d4c59b7ea824ba3f0c9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18937
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Currently we run profiling tests for around 200ms in short mode.
However, even on platforms with good profiling, these tests are
inherently flaky, especially on loaded systems like the builders.
To mitigate this, modify the profiling test harness so that if a test
fails in a way that could indicate there just weren't enough samples,
it retries with a longer duration.
This requires some adjustment to the profile checker to distinguish
"fatal" and "retryable" errors. In particular, we no longer consider
it a fatal error to get a profile with zero samples (which we
previously treated as a parse error). We replace this with a retryable
check that the total number of samples is reasonable.
Fixes#13943. Fixes#13871. Fixes#13223.
Change-Id: I9a08664a7e1734c5334b1f3792a56184fe314c4d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18683
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
People who want to use -buildmode=c-archive in unusual cross-compilation
setups will need something like this. It could also be done via (yet
another) environment variable but I use -extar by analogy with the
existing -extld.
Change-Id: I354cfabc4c470603affd13cd946997b3a24c0e6c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18913
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The x86 backend automatically rewrites MOV $0, AX to
XOR AX, AX. That rewrite isn't ok when the flags register
is live across the MOV. Keep track of which moves care
about preserving flags, then disable this rewrite for them.
On x86, Prog.Mark was being used to hold the length of the
instruction. We already store that in Prog.Isize, so no
need to store it in Prog.Mark also. This frees up Prog.Mark
to hold a bitmask on x86 just like all the other architectures.
Update #12405
Change-Id: Ibad8a8f41fc6222bec1e4904221887d3cc3ca029
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18861
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Windows: putting spaces where they don't belong since Windows NT 3.1.
Fixes#14002.
Change-Id: I48ba8a7bfe3f27f83c8aa8355a8d355933d6c5df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18855
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The conversion from -0.0 to +0.0 happens inside mpgetflt now.
The SSA code doesn't need this fix any more.
Change-Id: I6cd4f4a4e75b13cf284ebbb95b08af050ed9891c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18942
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Add example of how to use the aes package to
implement AES encryption and decryption
within an application.
Per feedback, use more secure AES-GCM implementation as an
example in crypto/cipher instead of AES directly.
Change-Id: I84453ebb18e0bc79344a24171a031ec0d7ccec2e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18803
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Was part of #13822 but not in the first message, so I missed it.
Fixes#13822 again.
Change-Id: I775004fa8d47b6af293124605521ec396573e267
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18900
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Use of the alternate signal stack on darwin/{arm,arm64} is reportedly
buggy, and the runtime function sigaltstack does nothing. So don't
check the sigaltstack result to decide how to handle the signal stack.
Fixes#14070.
Change-Id: Ie97ede8895fad721e3acc79225f2cafcbe1f3a81
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18940
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Also don't nil out the Request or Response Body on error. Just leave
it in its previous broken state. The docs now say it's undefined, but
it always was.
Fixes#14036
Change-Id: I7fe175a36cbc01b4158f4dffacd8733b2ffa9999
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18726
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
When using c-archive/c-shared, the signal handler for SIGPROF will not
be installed, which means that runtime/pprof.StartCPUProfile won't work.
There is no really good solution here, as the main program may want to
do its own profiling. For now, just document that runtime/pprof doesn't
work as expected, but that it will work if you use Notify to install the
Go signal handler.
Fixes#14043.
Change-Id: I7ff7a01df6ef7f63a7f050aac3674d640a246fb4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18911
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
On NetBSD and DragonFly a newly created thread inherits the signal stack
of the creating thread. That means that in a cgo program a C thread
created using pthread_create will get the signal stack of the creating
thread, most likely a Go thread. This will then lead to chaos if two
signals occur simultaneously.
We can't fix the general case. But we can fix the case of a C thread
that calls a Go function, by installing a new signal stack and then
dropping it when we return to C. That will break the case of a C thread
that calls sigaltstack and then calls Go, because we will drop the C
thread's alternate signal stack as we return from Go. Still, this is
the 1.5 behavior. And what else can we do?
Fixes#14051.
Fixes#14052.
Fixes#14067.
Change-Id: Iee286ca50b50ec712a4d929c7121c35e2383a7b9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18835
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Pass -c to generate an object. Pass GOPKGPATH as a symbol, not a
string. Pass -xassembler-with-cpp so that the preprocessor is run.
Change-Id: I84690a73cc580bb05724ed07c120cec9cfd5e48b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18733
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Add test for assembly errors, to verify fix.
Make sure invalid instruction errors are printed just once
(was printing them once per span iteration, so typically twice).
Fixes#13282.
Change-Id: Id5f66f80a80b3bc4832e00084b0a91f1afec7f8f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18858
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Apparently the darwin/386 builder does not enable cgo.
This failure turned up running
GOARCH=386 GOHOSTARCH=386 ./all.bash
on my Mac.
Change-Id: Ia2487c4fd85d4b0f9f564880f22d9fde379946c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18859
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Add amd64 instructions I promised to add for Go 1.6
at the beginning of January.
These may be the last instructions added by hand.
I intend to generate the whole set mechanically for Go 1.7.
Fixes#13822.
Change-Id: I8c6bae2efd25f717f9ec750402e50f408a911d2b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18853
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Use the standard names, for discoverability.
Use the standard register arguments, for correctness.
Implement all possible arguments, for completeness.
Enable the corresponding tests now that everything is standard.
Update the uses in package runtime.
Fixes#14068.
Change-Id: I8e1af9a41e7d02d98c2a82af3d4cdb3e9204824f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18852
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Generated by x86test, from https://golang.org/cl/18842
(still in progress).
The commented out lines are either missing or misspelled
or incorrectly handled instructions.
For #4816, #8037, #13822, #14068, #14069.
Change-Id: If309310c97d9d2a3c71fc64c51d4a957e9076ab7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18850
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Not much testing yet, but the test now exists.
Another step toward #13822.
Change-Id: Idb2b06bf53a6113c83008150b4c0b631bb195279
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18844
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Tests for this and many other instructions are in a separate followup CL.
For #14068.
Change-Id: I6955315996a34d7fb79369b9d9a0119d11745e85
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18849
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Ilya added POPCNT in a CL earlier this month but it's really only POPCNTQ.
The other forms still need to be added.
For #4816.
Change-Id: I1186850d32ad6d5777475c7808e6fc9d9133e118
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18848
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Not recognized in any instructions yet, but this lets the
assembler parse them at least.
For #14068.
Change-Id: Id4f7329a969b747a867ce261b20165fab2cdcab8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18846
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Also, remove output file if there are encoding errors.
The extra reports are convenient.
Removing the output file is very important.
Noticed while testing.
Change-Id: I0fab17d4078f93c5a0d6d1217d8d9a63ac789696
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18845
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Instead of two parallel files that look almost identical,
mark the expected differences in the original file.
The annotations being added here keep the tests passing,
but they also make clear a number of printing or parsing
errors that were not as easily seen when the data was
split across two files.
Fix a few diagnostic problems in cmd/internal/obj as well.
A step toward #13822.
Change-Id: I997172681ea6fa7da915ff0f0ab93d2b76f8dce2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18823
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
