These changes match the following gofrontend error messages:
blank1.go:16:1: error: may not define methods on non-local type
chan/perm.go:28:9: error: expected channel
chan/perm.go:29:11: error: left operand of ‘<-’ must be channel
chan/perm.go:69:9: error: argument must be channel
complit1.go:25:16: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:26:16: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:27:17: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:49:41: error: may only omit types within composite literals of slice, array, or map type
complit1.go:50:14: error: expected struct, slice, array, or map type for composite literal
convlit.go:24:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type string)
convlit.go:25:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type float64)
convlit.go:26:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type int)
ddd1.go:63:9: error: invalid use of ‘...’ calling non-variadic function
fixedbugs/bug176.go:12:18: error: index expression is not integer constant
fixedbugs/bug332.go:17:10: error: use of undefined type ‘T’
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:22:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:33:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:44:25: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:55:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4458.go:19:14: error: type has no method ‘foo’
fixedbugs/issue5172.go:24:14: error: too many expressions for struct
init.go:17:9: error: reference to undefined name ‘runtime’
initializerr.go:26:29: error: duplicate value for index 1
interface/explicit.go:60:14: error: type assertion only valid for interface types
label.go:64:9: error: reference to undefined label ‘go2’
label1.go:18:97: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:22:97: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:106:89: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:108:26: error: invalid continue label ‘on’
label1.go:111:118: error: break statement not within for or switch or select
label1.go:113:23: error: invalid break label ‘dance’
map1.go:64:9: error: not enough arguments
map1.go:65:9: error: not enough arguments
map1.go:67:9: error: argument 1 must be a map
method2.go:36:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
method2.go:37:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
method2.go:41:12: error: method requires pointer (use ‘(*T).g’)
syntax/chan1.go:13:19: error: send statement used as value; use select for non-blocking send
syntax/chan1.go:17:11: error: send statement used as value; use select for non-blocking send
Change-Id: I98047b60a376e3d2788836300f7fcac3f2c285cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/273527
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Adjusting gofrontend error messages for GCC standards causes the
messages expected by this test to be adjusted slightly: the gofrontend
code now quotes the _ identifier.
Change-Id: I55ee2ae70b4da3bf7a421ceea80b254dd17601a9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/183477
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Move test for isblank into addmethod so that most of the type checking
for methods is also performed for blank methods.
Fixes#11366.
Change-Id: I13d554723bf96d906d0b3ff390d7b7c87c1a5020
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16866
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
blank1.go:10:9: error: invalid package name _
blank1.go:17:2: error: cannot use _ as value
blank1.go:18:7: error: cannot use _ as value
blank1.go:20:8: error: invalid use of ‘_’
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/14088044
A struct with a single field was considered as equivalent to the
field type, which is incorrect is the field is blank.
Fields with padding could make the compiler think some
types are comparable when they are not.
Fixes#5698.
R=rsc, golang-dev, daniel.morsing, bradfitz, gri, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10271046
Very few of the compiler regression tests include a comment
saying waht they do. Many are obvious, some are anything but.
I've started with a-c in the top directory. More will follow once
we agree on the approach, correctness, and thoroughness here.
zerodivide.go sneaked in too.
R=rsc, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5656100
I haven't looked at the source, but the gc compiler appears to
omit "not used" errors when there is an error in the
initializer. This is harder to do in gccgo, and frankly I
think the "not used" error is still useful even if the
initializer has a problem. This CL tweaks some tests to avoid
the error, which is not the point of these tests in any case.
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5561059
