It's not used, it's never been used, and it doesn't do what its doc
comment says it does.
Fixes#18941.
Change-Id: Ia89d97fb87525f5b861d7701f919e0d6b7cbd376
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36322
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
CL 18057 added underscore to most external pe symbols
on windows/386/cgo. The CL changed runtime.epclntab and
runtime.pclntab pe symbols into _runtime.pclntab and
_runtime.epclntab, and now cmd/nm cannot find them.
Revert correspondent CL 18057 changes, because most pe
symbols do not need underscore prefix.
This CL also removes code that added obj.SHOSTOBJ symbols
explicitly, because each of those was also added via
genasmsym call. These created duplicate pe symbols (like
_GetProcAddress@8 and __GetProcAddress@8), and external
linker would complain.
This CL adds new test in cmd/nm to verify go programs
built with cgo.
Fixes#18416
Change-Id: I68b1be8fb631d95ec69bd485c77c79604fb23f26
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35076
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Avoid confusing use of $(( in non-arithmetic context.
Permit added targets linux-386-387 linux-arm-arm5 to be correctly
matched against pattern argument.
Change-Id: Ib004c926457acb760c7e270fdd2f4095b1787a6d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33492
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Rather than collecting static data nodes to be written out later, just
write them out immediately.
Change-Id: I51708b690e94bc3e288b4d6ba3307bf738a80f64
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36352
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
go/build already ignores them, but they cause make.bash to fail.
Fixes#18931.
Change-Id: Idd5c8c2a6f2309ecd5f0d669660704d6f5612710
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36351
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently the net/rpc/jsonrpc package only implements JSON-RPC version
1.0. This change updates the package's documentation with link to find
packages for JSON-RPC 2.0.
Fixes#10929
Change-Id: I3b6f1d17738a1759d7b62ab7b3ecef5b248d30ca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36330
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This CL fixes two issues:
1. Load ops were initially always lowered to unsigned loads, even
for signed types. This was fine by itself however LoadReg ops
(used to re-load spilled values) were lowered to signed loads
for signed types. This meant that spills could invalidate
optimizations that assumed the original unsigned load.
2. Types were not always being maintained correctly through rules
designed to eliminate unnecessary zero and sign extensions.
Fixes#18906.
Change-Id: I95785dcadba03f7e3e94524677e7d8d3d3b9b737
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36256
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Address review comments from earlier CLs.
These are changes I was too scared to try to push
down into the original CLs (thanks, Git).
Change-Id: I0e428fad73d71bd2a7d08178cf2e856de3cef19f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36257
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: Ib22fc435827d4a05a77a5200ac437ce00e2a4da3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36204
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: I05629567cc33fef41bc74eba4f7ff66e4851343c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36203
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: Iec17bf2243de129942ae5fba126ec5f217be7303
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36202
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: I2f349150659b6ddf6be4c675abba38dfe57ff652
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36201
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: I28b20d53d20dff06eede574eb5c20359db0d3991
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36200
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: I8e325d75f553b5d0b6224b56a705d2e2cb895de4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36199
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: I2d0ccdb84814537ab8b8842aa1b5f5bc0a88a0fc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36198
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: Icdd181098f9f0e81f68bf201e6867cdd8f820300
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36197
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: Ic802483e50598def638f1e2e706d5fdf7822d32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36196
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: I20dbc352c3df3c83a75811dd8e78c580a46b2202
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36195
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: I4cf05b076d81b780c87a31378523929b5da8964b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36194
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: I7c5dde6e7fe4f390e6607303b4d42535c674eac3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36193
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: I6ee5b053683034ea9462a9a0a4ea4f5ad24fa5a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36192
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: Icb3f168ade91e7da5fcab89ac75b768daefff359
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36191
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This is one CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: I63f578f5ac99c707b599ac5659293c46b275567d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36190
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This CL makes a few naming changes to break dependencies
between different parts of the go command, to make it easier
to split into different packages.
This is the first CL in a long sequence of changes to break up the
go command from one package into a plausible group of packages.
This sequence is concerned only with moving code, not changing
or cleaning up code. There will still be more cleanup after this sequence.
The entire sequence will be submitted together: it is not a goal
for the tree to build at every step.
For #18653.
Change-Id: I69a98b9ea48e61b1e1cda95273d29860b525415f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36129
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Before this CL, Go programs in c-archive or c-shared buildmodes
would not handle SIGPIPE. That leads to surprising behaviour where
writes on a closed pipe or socket would raise SIGPIPE and terminate
the program. This CL changes the Go runtime to handle
SIGPIPE regardless of buildmode. In addition, SIGPIPE from non-Go
code is forwarded.
This is a refinement of CL 32796 that fixes the case where a non-default
handler for SIGPIPE is installed by the host C program.
Fixes#17393
Change-Id: Ia41186e52c1ac209d0a594bae9904166ae7df7de
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35960
Run-TryBot: Elias Naur <elias.naur@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
If there is a defer, and that defer recovers, then the caller
can see all of the output parameters. That means that we must
mark all the output parameters live at any point which might panic.
If there is no defer then this is not necessary. This is implemented.
We could also detect whether there is a recover in any of the defers.
If not, we would need to mark only output params that the defer
actually references (and the closure mechanism already does that).
This is not implemented.
Fixes#18860.
Change-Id: If984fe6686eddce9408bf25e725dd17fc16b8578
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36030
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
These rules trigger 116 times while running make.bash.
And at least for the sample code at
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18906#issuecomment-277174241
they are providing optimizations not already present
in amd64.
Updates #18906
Change-Id: I410a480f566f5ab176fc573fb5ac74f9cffec225
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36217
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
sigtramp was calling sigtrampgo and depending on the fact that
the 3rd argument slot will not be modified on return. Our calling
convention doesn't guarantee that. Avoid that assumption.
There's no actual bug here, as sigtrampgo does not in fact modify its
argument slots. But I found this while working on the dead stack slot
clobbering tool. https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/23924/
Change-Id: Ia7e791a2b4c1c74fff24cba8169e7840b4b06ffc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36216
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The name lookups are unrooted; the test should be unrooted too.
Correctly skips the tests if the DNS config specifies a domain
suffix that has a wildcard entry causing all unrooted names to resolve.
Change-Id: I80470326a5d332f3b8d64663f765fd304c5e0811
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36253
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
It seems the problem is on gdb and the dynamic linker. Skip the
test for now until we figure out what's going on with the system.
Updates #18784.
Change-Id: Ic9320ffd463f6c231b2c4192652263b1cf7f4231
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36250
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The existing darwin/amd64 implementation of runtime.nanotime returns the
wallclock time, which results in timers not functioning properly when
system time runs backwards. By implementing the algorithm used by the
darwin syscall mach_absolute_time, timers will function as expected.
The algorithm is described at
https://opensource.apple.com/source/xnu/xnu-3248.60.10/libsyscall/wrappers/mach_absolute_time.sFixes#17610
Change-Id: I9c8d35240d48249a6837dca1111b1406e2686f67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35292
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Use (-x)>>63 instead of ((x-1)>>63)^-1 to get a mask that
is 0 when x is 0 and all ones when x is positive.
Saves one instruction when slicing.
Change-Id: Ib46d53d3aac6530ac481fa2f265a6eadf3df0567
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35641
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
