When the expected type is a basic type, we will now offer a
corresponding type conversion candidate. For example:
var foo int64
foo = // offer "int64(<>)" as a candidate
The type conversion candidate will be ranked below matching concrete
candidates but above the sea of non-matching candidates.
This change broke almost every completion test. I added a new
completion option for literal candidates so tests can selectively ask
for literal completions.
Updates golang/go#36015.
Change-Id: I63fbdb33436d662a666c1ffd3b2d918d840dccc7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/210288
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In cases like:
var foo []io.Writer
var buf *bytes.Buffer
foo = append(foo, <>)
we weren't giving "buf" a good score. When comparing the candidate
type *bytes.Buffer to the (variadic) expected type []io.Writer we were
turning the candidate type into []*bytes.Buffer. However, of course,
[]*bytes.Buffer is not assignable to []io.Writer, so the types didn't
match. Now we instead turn the expected type []io.Writer into
io.Writer and compare to *bytes.Buffer.
I fixed the @rank test note to check that the candidates' scores are
strictly decreasing. Previously it would allow candidates with the
same score if they happened to be in the right order. This made it
easier to right a test for this issue, but also uncovered an issue
with untyped completion logic. I fixed it to do the untyped constant
check if _either_ the expected or candidate type is
untyped (previously it required the candidate type to be untyped).
Fixesgolang/go#35625.
Change-Id: I9a837d6a781669cb7a2f1d6d3d7f360c85be49eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/207518
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Rather than panicking when we have not created any views for the packages,
we should show a reasonable error to the user. This change propagates the
errors to the user.
Updates golang/go#35599
Change-Id: I49789d8ce18e154f111bc3584488f468a129e30c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/207344
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
It attempts to detect changes that would invalidate the view and replace itself
with a new view when that happens
Change-Id: I0f1a8cd3bd6ddcef115fedc6c57ae0398b16d3b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/206147
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now a budget of 0 disables mean unlimited and tests no longer set the
budget. Hopefully the deep completion tests will stop flaking.
Updates golang/go#34617
Change-Id: Icdff5e78dcf1cc3d3fcbf0326716b39b00f0a8c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/203338
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Scan most sources, including GOPATH, the module cache, the main module,
and replace targets as appropriate. Use the cached stdlib instead of
scanning GOROOT.
We heavily cache the contents of the module cache, so performance is
decent. But we have to look at all the modules not in the module cache
too to get the right versions of modules (see
(*ModuleResolver).canonicalize), which currently isn't cached at all,
even just for a single run. That ends up being pretty expensive.
The implementation changes are relatively small; add package name
loading to scan(), cache that result, and allow callers to control what
directories are scanned so that it can skip GOROOT.
I also cleared out most of the stdlib from the unimported completion
test and added a simple external completion to it for safety's sake.
Change-Id: Id50fd4703b1126be35a000fe90719e19c3ab84bf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/199178
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The loops are common to all the testing layers, so lift them.
This prepares for more test improvements, without any funcitonal changes.
Change-Id: Ib750c8a7bb4c424a185cb0bd841674a69db1385b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/197717
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In CL 192137 deep fuzzy matching was enabled by default. We also have
options independent options "deepCompletion" and "fuzzyMatching" to
control this. When fuzzy matching is disabled, case insensitive prefix
matching is used.
Provide an option, "caseSensitiveCompletion", which allows for case
sensitive prefix matching when fuzzy matching is disabled.
Change-Id: I17c8fa310b2ef79e36cc2f7303e98870690b5903
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194757
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Our completion tests check for a lot of different behaviors. It may be
easier to develop if we have separate tests for things like deep
completion and completion snippets.
Change-Id: I7f4b0c0e52670f2a6c00247199933fd1ffa0096f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/196021
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
