CL 395854 made inline pass to not inlining function with shape params,
but pass no shape arguments. This is intended to be the reverse case of
CL 361260.
However, CL 361260 is using wider condition than necessary. Though it
only needs to check against function parameters, it checks whether the
function type has no shape. It does not cause any issue, because
!fn.Type().HasShape() implies !fn.Type().Params().HasShape().
But for the reverse case, it's not true. Function may have shape type,
but has no shape arguments. Thus, we must tighten the condition to
explicitly check against the function parameters only.
Fixes#52907
Change-Id: Ib87e87ff767c31d99d5b36aa4a6c1d8baf32746d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/406475
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
CL 395854 made inline pass to not inlining function with shape params,
but pass no shape arguments. But it does not consider the case where
function has shape params, but passing zero arguments. In this case, the
un-safe interface conversion that may be applied to a shape argument can
not happen, so it's safe to inline the function.
Fixes#52907
Change-Id: Ifa7b23709bb47b97e27dc1bf32343d92683ef783
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/406176
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
