Go 1.21 and earlier do not understand this line, causing
"go mod vendor" of //go:build go1.22-tagged code that
uses this feature to fail.
The solution is to include the go/build change to skip over
the line in Go 1.22 (making "go mod vendor" from Go 1.22 onward
work with this change) and then wait to deploy the cgo change
until Go 1.23, at which point Go 1.21 and earlier will be unsupported.
For #56378.
Fixes#63293.
Change-Id: Ifa08b134eac5a6aa15d67dad0851f00e15e1e58b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/539235
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Change-Id: I11d0947d6d2ffa91745c8e36a3984ffee85abbd0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/528896
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The upcoming built-in zero value provides an idiomatic way
to test for zero by comparing to the zero literal: v == zero.
The reflect package is meant to provide a programmatic way to perform
operations that the Go language itself provides.
Thus, it seems prudent that reflect.ValueOf(&v).Elem().IsZero() is
identical to v == zero.
This change alters the behavior of Value.IsZero in two concrete ways:
* negative zero is identical to zero
* blank fields in a struct are ignored
Prior to this change, we were already in an inconsistent state
due to a regression introduced by CL 411478.
The new behavior was already the case for comparable composite types.
This change makes it consistent for all other types
(in particular incomparable composite types and standalone numbers).
Updates #61372Fixes#61827
Change-Id: Id23fb97eb3b8921417cc75a1d3ead963e22dc3d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/517777
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
For #56378
Change-Id: I0c9c662c6d765cad6f7bf17fdd648db8d73e429b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/522937
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Bypass: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
For #60370.
Change-Id: Idae906ec7027be6d95f78bf43f7ce8f9d07e6c00
GitHub-Last-Rev: c645f0cf82
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#62033
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/519555
TryBot-Bypass: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
