Follow-up on https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/39998/
which dropped this information.
The reported blocks are the innermost blocks containing a
label jumped to from outside, not the outermost block as
reported originally by cmd/compile.
We could report the outermost block with a slighly more
involved algorithm (need to track containing blocks for
all unresolved forward gotos), but since gccgo also reports
the innermost blocks, the current approach seems good enough.
Change-Id: Ic0235b8fafe8d5f99dc9872b58e90e8d9e72c5db
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40980
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Marvin Stenger <marvin.stenger94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Instead of a separate check control flow pass (checkcfg.go)
operating on nodes, perform this check at parse time on the
new syntax tree. Permits this check to be done concurrently,
and doesn't depend on the specifics of the symbol's dclstack
implementation anymore. The remaining dclstack uses will be
removed in a follow-up change.
- added CheckBranches Mode flag (so we can turn off the check
if we only care about syntactic correctness, e.g. for tests)
- adjusted test/goto.go error messages: the new branches
checker only reports if a goto jumps into a block, but not
which block (we may want to improve this again, eventually)
- also, the new branches checker reports one variable that
is being jumped over by a goto, but it may not be the first
one declared (this is fine either way)
- the new branches checker reports additional errors for
fixedbugs/issue14006.go (not crucial to avoid those errors)
- the new branches checker now correctly reports only
variable declarations being jumped over, rather than
all declarations (issue 8042). Added respective tests.
Fixes#8042.
Change-Id: I53b6e1bda189748e1e1fb5b765a8a64337c27d40
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39998
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
