These changes match the following gofrontend error messages:
blank1.go:16:1: error: may not define methods on non-local type
chan/perm.go:28:9: error: expected channel
chan/perm.go:29:11: error: left operand of ‘<-’ must be channel
chan/perm.go:69:9: error: argument must be channel
complit1.go:25:16: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:26:16: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:27:17: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:49:41: error: may only omit types within composite literals of slice, array, or map type
complit1.go:50:14: error: expected struct, slice, array, or map type for composite literal
convlit.go:24:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type string)
convlit.go:25:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type float64)
convlit.go:26:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type int)
ddd1.go:63:9: error: invalid use of ‘...’ calling non-variadic function
fixedbugs/bug176.go:12:18: error: index expression is not integer constant
fixedbugs/bug332.go:17:10: error: use of undefined type ‘T’
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:22:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:33:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:44:25: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:55:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4458.go:19:14: error: type has no method ‘foo’
fixedbugs/issue5172.go:24:14: error: too many expressions for struct
init.go:17:9: error: reference to undefined name ‘runtime’
initializerr.go:26:29: error: duplicate value for index 1
interface/explicit.go:60:14: error: type assertion only valid for interface types
label.go:64:9: error: reference to undefined label ‘go2’
label1.go:18:97: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:22:97: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:106:89: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:108:26: error: invalid continue label ‘on’
label1.go:111:118: error: break statement not within for or switch or select
label1.go:113:23: error: invalid break label ‘dance’
map1.go:64:9: error: not enough arguments
map1.go:65:9: error: not enough arguments
map1.go:67:9: error: argument 1 must be a map
method2.go:36:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
method2.go:37:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
method2.go:41:12: error: method requires pointer (use ‘(*T).g’)
syntax/chan1.go:13:19: error: send statement used as value; use select for non-blocking send
syntax/chan1.go:17:11: error: send statement used as value; use select for non-blocking send
Change-Id: I98047b60a376e3d2788836300f7fcac3f2c285cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/273527
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This change adds line position tests for several yyerror calls in the
typechecker that are currently not tested in any way.
Untested yyerror calls were found by replacing them with
yerrorl(src.NoXPos, ...)
(thus destroying position information in the error), and then running
the test suite. No failures means no test coverage for the relevant
yyerror call.
For #19683
Change-Id: Iedb3d2f02141b332e9bfa76dbf5ae930ad2fddc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41477
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
// ERROR "pattern1" "pattern2"
means that there has to be one or more
lines matching pattern1 and then excluding
those, there have to be one or more lines
matching pattern2. So if you expect two
different error messages from a particular
line, writing two separate patterns checks
that both errors are produced.
Also, errchk now flags lines that produce
more errors than expected. Before, as long as
at least one error matched the pattern, all the
others were ignored.
Revise tests to expect or silence these
additional errors.
R=lvd, r, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4869044
The change to assign.go is because the gcc testsuite fails to
handle .* in a normal way: it matches against the entire
compiler output, not just a single line.
assign.go:15:6: error: incompatible types in assignment (implicit assignment of 'sync.Mutex' hidden field 'key')
assign.go:19:6: error: incompatible types in assignment (implicit assignment of 'sync.Mutex' hidden field 'key')
assign.go:23:6: error: incompatible types in assignment (implicit assignment of 'sync.Mutex' hidden field 'key')
assign.go:27:6: error: incompatible types in assignment (implicit assignment of 'sync.Mutex' hidden field 'key')
chan/perm.go:14:5: error: incompatible types in assignment
chan/perm.go:15:5: error: incompatible types in assignment
chan/perm.go:16:6: error: incompatible types in assignment
chan/perm.go:17:6: error: incompatible types in assignment
chan/perm.go:24:7: error: invalid send on receive-only channel
chan/perm.go:25:12: error: invalid send on receive-only channel
chan/perm.go:31:4: error: invalid receive on send-only channel
chan/perm.go:32:9: error: invalid receive on send-only channel
chan/perm.go:38:2: error: invalid send on receive-only channel
chan/perm.go:42:2: error: invalid receive on send-only channel
initializerr.go:14:17: error: reference to undefined variable 'X'
initializerr.go:14:19: error: mixture of field and value initializers
initializerr.go:15:26: error: duplicate value for field 'Y'
initializerr.go:16:10: error: too many values in struct composite literal
initializerr.go:18:19: error: index expression is not integer constant
initializerr.go:17:11: error: too many elements in composite literal
R=rsc
DELTA=12 (0 added, 0 deleted, 12 changed)
OCL=29657
CL=29665
