-s now means *disable* escape analysis.
Fix escape leaks for struct/slice/map literals.
Add ... tracking.
Rewrite new(T) and slice literal into stack allocation when safe.
Add annotations to reflect.
Reflect is too chummy with the compiler,
so changes like these affect it more than they should.
R=lvd, dave, gustavo
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4954043
This allows code that wants to handle
[]byte separately to get at the actual slice
instead of just at individual bytes.
It seems to come up often enough.
R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4942051
This was initially pushed as part of CL 4876046, found
when logic in exp/template was using the method on
an Invalid value.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4890043
It's probably just an oversight that it doesn't work,
perhaps caused by analogy with Cap.
R=golang-dev, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4634125
Each package using struct field tags assumes that
it is the only package storing data in the tag.
This CL adds support in package reflect for sharing
tags between multiple packages. In this scheme, the
tags must be of the form
key:"value" key2:"value2"
(raw strings help when writing that tag in Go source).
reflect.StructField's Tag field now has type StructTag
(a string type), which has method Get(key string) string
that returns the associated value.
Clients of json and xml will need to be updated.
Code that says
type T struct {
X int "name"
}
should become
type T struct {
X int `json:"name"` // or `xml:"name"`
}
Use govet to identify struct tags that need to be changed
to use the new syntax.
R=r, r, dsymonds, bradfitz, kevlar, fvbommel, n13m3y3r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4645069
When GOMAXPROCS>1, the testing framework runs in parallel with the
test itself and may do a small number of allocations, so allow the
"noAllocs" condition to admit just a few.
Fixes#1782.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev, rsc
https://golang.org/cl/4533041
go/types: update for export data format change
reflect: require package qualifiers to match during interface check
runtime: require package qualifiers to match during interface check
test: fixed bug324, adapt to be silent
Fixes#1550.
Issue 1536 remains open.
R=gri, ken2, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4442071
This CL makes reflect require that values be assignable to the target type
in exactly the same places where that is the rule in Go. It also adds
the Implements and AssignableTo methods so that callers can check
the types themselves so as to avoid a panic.
Before this CL, reflect required strict type identity.
This CL expands Call to accept and correctly marshal arbitrary
argument lists for variadic functions; it introduces CallSlice for use
in the case where the slice for the variadic argument is already known.
Fixes#327.
Fixes#1212.
R=r, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4439058
* Reduces malloc counts during gob encoder/decoder test from 6/6 to 3/5.
The current reflect uses Set to mean two subtly different things.
(1) If you have a reflect.Value v, it might just represent
itself (as in v = reflect.NewValue(42)), in which case calling
v.Set only changed v, not any other data in the program.
(2) If you have a reflect Value v derived from a pointer
or a slice (as in x := []int{42}; v = reflect.NewValue(x).Index(0)),
v represents the value held there. Changing x[0] affects the
value returned by v.Int(), and calling v.Set affects x[0].
This was not really by design; it just happened that way.
The motivation for the new reflect implementation was
to remove mallocs. The use case (1) has an implicit malloc
inside it. If you can do:
v := reflect.NewValue(0)
v.Set(42)
i := v.Int() // i = 42
then that implies that v is referring to some underlying
chunk of memory in order to remember the 42; that is,
NewValue must have allocated some memory.
Almost all the time you are using reflect the goal is to
inspect or to change other data, not to manipulate data
stored solely inside a reflect.Value.
This CL removes use case (1), so that an assignable
reflect.Value must always refer to some other piece of data
in the program. Put another way, removing this case would
make
v := reflect.NewValue(0)
v.Set(42)
as illegal as
0 = 42.
It would also make this illegal:
x := 0
v := reflect.NewValue(x)
v.Set(42)
for the same reason. (Note that right now, v.Set(42) "succeeds"
but does not change the value of x.)
If you really wanted to make v refer to x, you'd start with &x
and dereference it:
x := 0
v := reflect.NewValue(&x).Elem() // v = *&x
v.Set(42)
It's pretty rare, except in tests, to want to use NewValue and then
call Set to change the Value itself instead of some other piece of
data in the program. I haven't seen it happen once yet while
making the tree build with this change.
For the same reasons, reflect.Zero (formerly reflect.MakeZero)
would also return an unassignable, unaddressable value.
This invalidates the (awkward) idiom:
pv := ... some Ptr Value we have ...
v := reflect.Zero(pv.Type().Elem())
pv.PointTo(v)
which, when the API changed, turned into:
pv := ... some Ptr Value we have ...
v := reflect.Zero(pv.Type().Elem())
pv.Set(v.Addr())
In both, it is far from clear what the code is trying to do. Now that
it is possible, this CL adds reflect.New(Type) Value that does the
obvious thing (same as Go's new), so this code would be replaced by:
pv := ... some Ptr Value we have ...
pv.Set(reflect.New(pv.Type().Elem()))
The changes just described can be confusing to think about,
but I believe it is because the old API was confusing - it was
conflating two different kinds of Values - and that the new API
by itself is pretty simple: you can only Set (or call Addr on)
a Value if it actually addresses some real piece of data; that is,
only if it is the result of dereferencing a Ptr or indexing a Slice.
If you really want the old behavior, you'd get it by translating:
v := reflect.NewValue(x)
into
v := reflect.New(reflect.Typeof(x)).Elem()
v.Set(reflect.NewValue(x))
Gofix will not be able to help with this, because whether
and how to change the code depends on whether the original
code meant use (1) or use (2), so the developer has to read
and think about the code.
You can see the effect on packages in the tree in
https://golang.org/cl/4423043/.
R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4435042
This CL is only cut-and-paste, moving code around.
Moving it in a separate CL should simplify the diffs in later CLs.
There are three patterns here.
1. A function like
func (v Value) M() (...) {
return v.panicIfNot(K).(*kValue).M()
}
becomes
func (v Value) M() (...) {
vv := v.panicIfNot(K).(*kValue)
// body of (*kValue).M, s/v./vv./g
}
2. A function like
func (v Value) M() (...) {
return v.panicIfNots(kList).(mer).M()
}
becomes
func (v Value) M() (...) {
switch vv := v.panicIfNots(kList).(type) {
case *k1Value:
// body of (*k1Value).M, s/v./vv./g
case *k2Value:
// body of (*k2Value).M, s/v./vv./g
...
}
panic("not reached")
}
3. The rewrite of Value.Set follows 2, but each case
is built from the bodies of (*kValue).SetValue and (*kValue).Set.
func (v *kValue) SetValue(x Value) {
v.Set(x.panicIfNot(K).(*kValue)
}
func (v *kValue) Set(x *kValue) {
... body
}
becomes, in the switch from 2,
case *kValue:
xx := x.panicIfNot(K).(*kValue)
... body, s/v./vv./g; s/x./xx./g
R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4398044
Type is now an interface that implements all the possible type methods.
Instead of a type switch on a reflect.Type t, switch on t.Kind().
If a method is invoked on the wrong kind of type (for example,
calling t.Field(0) when t.Kind() != Struct), the call panics.
There is one method renaming: t.(*ChanType).Dir() is now t.ChanDir().
Value is now a struct value that implements all the possible value methods.
Instead of a type switch on a reflect.Value v, switch on v.Kind().
If a method is invoked on the wrong kind of value (for example,
calling t.Recv() when t.Kind() != Chan), the call panics.
Since Value is now a struct, not an interface, its zero value
cannot be compared to nil. Instead of v != nil, use v.IsValid().
Instead of other uses of nil as a Value, use Value{}, the zero value.
Many methods have been renamed, most due to signature conflicts:
OLD NEW
v.(*ArrayValue).Elem v.Index
v.(*BoolValue).Get v.Bool
v.(*BoolValue).Set v.SetBool
v.(*ChanType).Dir v.ChanDir
v.(*ChanValue).Get v.Pointer
v.(*ComplexValue).Get v.Complex
v.(*ComplexValue).Overflow v.OverflowComplex
v.(*ComplexValue).Set v.SetComplex
v.(*FloatValue).Get v.Float
v.(*FloatValue).Overflow v.OverflowFloat
v.(*FloatValue).Set v.SetFloat
v.(*FuncValue).Get v.Pointer
v.(*InterfaceValue).Get v.InterfaceData
v.(*IntValue).Get v.Int
v.(*IntValue).Overflow v.OverflowInt
v.(*IntValue).Set v.SetInt
v.(*MapValue).Elem v.MapIndex
v.(*MapValue).Get v.Pointer
v.(*MapValue).Keys v.MapKeys
v.(*MapValue).SetElem v.SetMapIndex
v.(*PtrValue).Get v.Pointer
v.(*SliceValue).Elem v.Index
v.(*SliceValue).Get v.Pointer
v.(*StringValue).Get v.String
v.(*StringValue).Set v.SetString
v.(*UintValue).Get v.Uint
v.(*UintValue).Overflow v.OverflowUint
v.(*UintValue).Set v.SetUint
v.(*UnsafePointerValue).Get v.Pointer
v.(*UnsafePointerValue).Set v.SetPointer
Part of the motivation for this change is to enable a more
efficient implementation of Value, one that does not allocate
memory during most operations. To reduce the size of the CL,
this CL's implementation is a wrapper around the old API.
Later CLs will make the implementation more efficient without
changing the API.
Other CLs to be submitted at the same time as this one
add support for this change to gofix (4343047) and update
the Go source tree (4353043).
R=gri, iant, niemeyer, r, rog, gustavo, r2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4281055
This change makes it possible to take the address of a
struct field or slice element in order to call a method that
requires a pointer receiver.
Existing code that uses the Value.Addr method will have
to change (as gob does in this CL) to call UnsafeAddr instead.
R=r, rog
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4239052
The pointer will eventually let us find *T given T.
This CL just makes room for it, always storing a zero.
R=r, r2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4221046
It was observed that the interface was generic enough
that several other types implemented it too.
Fixes#1530.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4169063
cc: same
runtime: test cc alignment (required moving #define of offsetof to runtime.h)
fix bug260
Fixes#482.
Fixes#609.
R=ken2, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3563042
I have written a tool to verify Printf calls, and although it's not
ready to be reviewed yet it's already uncovered a spate of problems
in the repository. I'm sending this CL to break the changes into
pieces; as the tool improves it will find more, I'm sure.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3427043
Cleaner, but also results in a 25%+ performance improvement for Get()/SetValue() on my machine.
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3072041
value (through unsafe means) without having a reflect.Type
of type *interface{} (pointer to interface). This is needed to make
gob able to handle interface values by a method analogous to
the way it handles maps.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/2597041
(Argument: For any *PtrValue p, it should
always be possible to do: p.PointTo(p.Elem()),
even if p.Elem() is nil.)
Fixes#1028.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev, r
https://golang.org/cl/1938044
