Avoid logging to stderr as it will interfere with LSP communication.
Change-Id: Ic9ff4f3555eabb8b0b6503650df7de5ddb76ef98
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/249997
Run-TryBot: Pontus Leitzler <leitzler@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
In the previous implementation, we always created a default
value for each type in the struct or return statement in fillstruct
and fillreturns, respectively. Now, we try to find a variable in scope
that matches the expected type. If we find multiple matches, we choose
the variable that is named most similarly to the type. If we do not
find a variable that matches, we maintain the previous functionality.
Change-Id: I3acb7e27476afaa71aaff9ffb69445913575e2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/245130
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In the previous implementation, we kept the first variable in the
return statement that matched the each given return type. Now, we
keep searching for a non-"zero" value, even if we have already found
a "zero" value.
Change-Id: Icf0987bab90239781452319979e7a30502807e36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246917
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In the previous implementation, fillreturns only altered return
statements that contained too few values. Now, fillreturns also examines
return statements with too many return values. In these situations,
we remove any value that is a "zero value" and does not match a type
in the return signature.
Change-Id: I7548307234ff4b16534b72a8aead95a322eb535a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246520
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Code actions that apply convenience fixes were filtered by the start
line so it wasn't possible to narrow the scope to a specific range.
This change allows clients to send a specific range (or cursor position)
to filter all fixes where the range doesn't intersect with the provided
range. It also widens the diagnostic returned by fillstruct analysis.
The idea is to provide a way to narrow the scope without breaking
clients that do want to ask for code actions using the entire line.
Updates golang/go#40438
Change-Id: Ifd984a092a4a3bf0b3a2a5426d3e65023ba4eebc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/244519
Run-TryBot: Pontus Leitzler <leitzler@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The logic for extracting a function is quite signficant, and the code
is expensive enough that we should only call it when requested by the
user. This means that we should support extracting through a command
rather than text edits in the code action.
To that end, we create a new struct for commands. Features like extract
variable and extract function can supply functions to determine if they
are relevant to the given range, and if so, to generate their text
edits. source.Analyzers now point to Commands, rather than
SuggestedFixFuncs. The "canExtractVariable" and "canExtractFunction"
functions still need improvements, but I think that can be done in a
follow-up.
Change-Id: I9ec894c5abdbb28505a0f84ad7c76aa50977827a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/244598
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
This CL is a follow-up from CL 241983. I didn't realize that the
undeclaredname analysis was also using the go/printer.Fprint trick,
which we decided was both incorrect and inefficient. This CL does
approximately the same things as CL 241983, with a few changes to make
the approach more general.
source.Analyzer now has a field to indicate if its suggested fix needs
to be computed separately, and that is used to determine which
code actions get commands. We also make helper functions to map
analyses to their commands.
I figured out a neater way to test suggested fixes in this CL, so I
reversed the move to source_test back to lsp_test (which was the right
place all along).
Change-Id: I505bf4790481d887edda8b82897e541ec73fb427
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/242366
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
This change moves the suggested fixes logic for fillstruct out of the
analysis and into internal/lsp/source. This logic is then used as part
of a new fillstruct command. This command is returned along with the
code action results, to be executed only when the user accepts the code
action.
This led to a number of changes to testing. The suggested fix tests in
internal/lsp doesn't support executing commands, so we skip them. The
suggested fix tests in internal/lsp/source are changed to call
fillstruct directly. A new regtest is added to check the command
execution, which led to a few regtest changes.
Also, remove the `go mod tidy` code action, as it's made redundant by
the existence of the suggested fixes coming from internal/lsp/mod.
Change-Id: I35ca0aff1ace8f0097fe7cb57232997facb516a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/241983
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
I add a code action that triggers upon request of the user. A variable
name is generated manually for the extracted code because the LSP does
not support a user's ability to provide a name.
Change-Id: Id1ec19b49562b7cfbc2cd416378bec9bd021d82f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/240182
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The previous implementation did not support filling anonymous structs.
This is distinct from filling a struct that has an anonymous
struct as a field. That field will still not be filled.
golang/go#39929 has been opened to address this limitation.
Fixes: golang/go#39803
Change-Id: Ia7ba9fda2bdee092d182e0a23829b9a6d9a4b986
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/240463
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Getting the right indentation for the text in the AST proves to be a
little complicated. The most reasonable approach seems to be writing
out the AST, getting the lines with the struct definition on it,
and trimming whitespace to get the current indent. Then, we add this
indent to the struct fields in the new text.
Change-Id: I1cc3421d95edae61cfb662254ff3fb759b5c487f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/239199
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
The current implementation writes strings to the diagnostic instead
of creating new AST nodes.
Change-Id: Ibb37a93a3c43fb74ec5dc687091601e055c6e1b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/238198
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now that fillstruct is an analyzer, we can simplify the code that calls
it in code_action.go. We introduce a new class of analyzer --
convenience analyzers, which are closer to commands. These represent
suggestions that won't necessarily improve the quality or correctness of
your code, but they offer small helper functions for the user.
This CL also combines the refactor rewrite tests with the suggested fix
tests, since they are effectively the same.
For now, we only support convenience analyzers when a code action was
requested on the same line as the fix. I'm not sure how to otherwise
handle this without bothering the user with unnecessary diagnostics.
Change-Id: I7f0aa198b5ee9964a907d709bae6380093d4ef21
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/237687
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The current implementation of the fill struct tool is not a part of
the analysis framework. This commit moves the functionality from the
source directory to the analysis directory.
Change-Id: Ibe37b57f3e6680c8729932dbbe010a4642600e4a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/237258
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The existing implementation looks for matching types in the declaration
and the leftmost value in the return statement. Instead, the analyzer
now searches across all the values in the return statement to find one
that matches the type in the declaration. Additionally, if a value in
the return statement does not match any type in the declaration, it is
not overriden.
Change-Id: I4d4aed0ef67e59bfd886b44055d523a8c478255c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/236962
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The existing implementation contains strict equality rules for
comparing the return type in the function declaration against
the return types in the function body. This causes the code in the
return statement to be incorrectly overriden with its corresponding
zero value type by the fillreturns analyzer.
Fixesgolang/go#38707
Change-Id: I07522aaf85f2a5f811a86cbc0951ae61035ff55e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/236617
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change is the first step in handling golang/go#38136. Instead of
creating multiple diagnostic reports for type error analyzers, we add
suggested fixes to the existing reports. To match the analyzers for
FindAnalysisError, we add an ErrorMatch function to source.Analyzer.
This is not an ideal solution, but it was the best one I could come up
with without modifying the go/analysis API. analysisinternal could be
used for this purpose, but it seemed to complicated to be worth it, and
this is fairly simple. I think that go/analysis itself might need to be
extended for type error analyzers, but these temporary measures will
help us understand the kinds of features we need for type error
analyzers.
A follow-up CL might be to not add reports for type error analyzers
until the end of source.Diagnostic, which would remove the need for the
look-up.
Fixesgolang/go#38136
Change-Id: I25bc6396b09d49facecd918bf5591d2d5bdf1b3a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/226777
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
The code for `gofmt -s` directly modifies the AST, since the ASTs are
not long-lived. Some of this code made it into our analysis
implementations, causing very strange bugs to manifest. Added a
regression test for this specific case.
Fixesgolang/go#38267
Change-Id: I235620adcbf2bbc7027c6d83ff2c7fe74729062e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/227299
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
This change ports the functionality of https://github.com/sqs/goreturns
to be used as code actions on diagnostics that have missing
return values. It improves on the original goreturns functionality by:
- filling out empty return statements
- trying to match existing return values to the required return
values and then filling in missing parameters
Fixesgolang/go#37091
Change-Id: Ifaf9bf571c3bc3c61e672b0a2f725d8d734d432d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/224960
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds a quick fix for type errors of the type "no new vars on left side of :=". It will replace the ":=" with an "=".
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: I91af8eb82956104229c3b4f3d0fce60fdfdbb5ea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/225477
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds a quick fix for type errors of the type "no result values expected". It will replace the return statment with an empty return statement.
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: I3885748dfc69a2d19f8e7a2e81f36f6d0a20d25b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223666
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds a quick fix for diagnostics that have an error message of the form "undeclared name: %s". It provides a quick fix to add a new variable with that name.
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: I6534ee79d1770d1a62bac169c3c7e52e2443f39e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222237
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This is one of the simplifications that "gofmt -s" applies.
https://golang.org/cmd/gofmt/#hdr-The_simplify_command
A slice expression of the form:
s[a:len(s)]
will be simplified to:
s[a:]
Updates golang/go#37221
Change-Id: Ibd4dedaadc9b129d5d39524f0c1ccc8a95bf7e0d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223659
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
This is one of the simplifications that "gofmt -s" applies.
https://golang.org/cmd/gofmt/#hdr-The_simplify_command
An array, slice, or map composite literal of the form:
[]T{T{}, T{}}
will be simplified to:
[]T{{}, {}}
Updates golang/go#37221
Change-Id: I2dca46501983c8af3581c9319d973da5cf690388
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223660
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
This change adds a pass that checks for unused parameters inside of a function. It is disabled by default.
Updates golang/go#36602
Change-Id: I9e8de3368f16f27e7816ec4ddb16935e1a05584e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222817
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This is one of the simplifications that "gofmt -s" applies.
https://golang.org/cmd/gofmt/#hdr-The_simplify_command
A range of the form:
for x, _ = range v {...}
will be simplified to:
for x = range v {...}
A range of the form:
for _ = range v {...}
will be simplified to:
for range v {...}
Updates golang/go#37221
Change-Id: Ic6babbd0b8ab961ebb4d0d6df72df52d9acde6e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223661
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
