This information is redundant with the position information already
provided. Also, no other -m diagnostics print out function name.
While here, report parameter leak diagnostics against the parameter
declaration position rather than the function, and use Warnl for
"moved to heap" messages.
Test cases updated programmatically by removing the first word from
every "no match for" error emitted by run.go:
go run run.go |& \
sed -E -n 's/^(.*):(.*): no match for `([^ ]* (.*))` in:$/\1!\2!\3!\4/p' | \
while IFS='!' read -r fn line before after; do
before=$(echo "$before" | sed 's/[.[\*^$()+?{|]/\\&/g')
after=$(echo "$after" | sed -E 's/(\&|\\)/\\&/g')
fn=$(find . -name "${fn}" | head -1)
sed -i -E -e "${line}s/\"${before}\"/\"${after}\"/" "${fn}"
done
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I6e02486b1409e4a8dbb2b9b816d22095835426b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/195040
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
For most nodes (e.g., OPTRLIT, OMAKESLICE, OCONVIFACE), escape
analysis prints "escapes to heap" or "does not escape" to indicate
whether that node's allocation can be heap or stack allocated.
These messages are also emitted for OADDR, even though OADDR does not
actually allocate anything itself. Moreover, it's redundant because
escape analysis already prints "moved to heap" diagnostics when an
OADDR node like "&x" causes x to require heap allocation.
Because OADDR nodes don't allocate memory, my escape analysis rewrite
doesn't naturally emit the "escapes to heap" / "does not escape"
diagnostics for them. It's also non-trivial to replicate the exact
semantics esc.go uses for OADDR.
Since there are so many of these messages, I'm disabling them in this
CL by themselves. I modified esc.go to suppress the Warnl calls
without any other behavior changes, and then used a shell script to
automatically remove any ERROR messages mentioned by run.go in
"missing error" or "no match for" lines.
Fixes#16300.
Updates #23109.
Change-Id: I3993e2743c3ff83ccd0893f4e73b366ff8871a57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170319
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
This is a simple tweak to allow a bit more mid-stack inlining.
In cases like this:
func f() {
g()
}
We'd really like to inline f into its callers. It can't hurt.
We implement this optimization by making calls a bit cheaper, enough
to afford a single call in the function body, but not 2.
The remaining budget allows for some argument modification, or perhaps
a wrapping conditional:
func f(x int) {
g(x, 0)
}
func f(x int) {
if x > 0 {
g()
}
}
Update #19348
Change-Id: Ifb1ea0dd1db216c3fd5c453c31c3355561fe406f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147361
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Calls to a closure held in a local, non-escaping,
variable can be inlined, provided the closure body
can be inlined and the variable is never written to.
The current implementation has the following limitations:
- closures with captured variables are not inlined because
doing so naively triggers invariant violation in the SSA
phase
- re-assignment check is currently approximated by checking
the Addrtaken property of the variable which should be safe
but may miss optimization opportunities if the address is
not used for a write before the invocation
Updates #15561
Change-Id: I508cad5d28f027bd7e933b1f793c14dcfef8b5a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65071
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugues Bruant <hugues.bruant@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
We've supported inlining methods called as functions for a while now.
Change-Id: I53fba426e45f91d65a38f00456c2ae1527372b50
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69530
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Allow inlining of functions with switch statements as long as they don't
contain a break or type switch.
Fixes#13071
Change-Id: I057be351ea4584def1a744ee87eafa5df47a7f6d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20824
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Consider functions with an ODCLCONST for inlining and modify exprfmt to
ignore those nodes when exporting. Don't add symbols to the export list
if there is no definition. This occurs when OLITERAL symbols are looked
up via Pkglookup for non-exported symbols.
Fixes#7655
Change-Id: I1de827850f4c69e58107447314fe7433e378e069
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20773
Run-TryBot: Todd Neal <todd@tneal.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Some tests need to disable inlining of a function. It's currently done
in one of a few ways (adding a function call, an empty switch, or a
defer). Add support for a less fragile 'go:noinline' directive that
prevents inlining.
Fixes#12312
Change-Id: Ife444e13361b4a927709d81aa41e448f32eec8d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13911
Run-TryBot: Todd Neal <todd@tneal.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Inlining refuses to inline bodies containing an actual function call, so that
if that call or a child uses runtime.Caller it cannot observe
the inlining.
However, inlining was also refusing to inline bodies that contained
function calls that were themselves inlined away. For example:
func f() int {
return f1()
}
func f1() int {
return f2()
}
func f2() int {
return 2
}
The f2 call in f1 would be inlined, but the f1 call in f would not,
because f1's call to f2 blocked the inlining, despite itself eventually
being inlined away.
Account properly for this kind of transitive inlining and enable.
Also bump the inlining budget a bit, so that the runtime's
heapBits.next is inlined.
This reduces the time for '6g *.go' in html/template by around 12% (!).
(For what it's worth, closing Chrome reduces the time by about 17%.)
Change-Id: If1aa673bf3e583082dcfb5f223e67355c984bfc1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/5952
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
