These changes match the following gofrontend error messages:
blank1.go:16:1: error: may not define methods on non-local type
chan/perm.go:28:9: error: expected channel
chan/perm.go:29:11: error: left operand of ‘<-’ must be channel
chan/perm.go:69:9: error: argument must be channel
complit1.go:25:16: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:26:16: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:27:17: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:49:41: error: may only omit types within composite literals of slice, array, or map type
complit1.go:50:14: error: expected struct, slice, array, or map type for composite literal
convlit.go:24:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type string)
convlit.go:25:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type float64)
convlit.go:26:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type int)
ddd1.go:63:9: error: invalid use of ‘...’ calling non-variadic function
fixedbugs/bug176.go:12:18: error: index expression is not integer constant
fixedbugs/bug332.go:17:10: error: use of undefined type ‘T’
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:22:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:33:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:44:25: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:55:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4458.go:19:14: error: type has no method ‘foo’
fixedbugs/issue5172.go:24:14: error: too many expressions for struct
init.go:17:9: error: reference to undefined name ‘runtime’
initializerr.go:26:29: error: duplicate value for index 1
interface/explicit.go:60:14: error: type assertion only valid for interface types
label.go:64:9: error: reference to undefined label ‘go2’
label1.go:18:97: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:22:97: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:106:89: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:108:26: error: invalid continue label ‘on’
label1.go:111:118: error: break statement not within for or switch or select
label1.go:113:23: error: invalid break label ‘dance’
map1.go:64:9: error: not enough arguments
map1.go:65:9: error: not enough arguments
map1.go:67:9: error: argument 1 must be a map
method2.go:36:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
method2.go:37:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
method2.go:41:12: error: method requires pointer (use ‘(*T).g’)
syntax/chan1.go:13:19: error: send statement used as value; use select for non-blocking send
syntax/chan1.go:17:11: error: send statement used as value; use select for non-blocking send
Change-Id: I98047b60a376e3d2788836300f7fcac3f2c285cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/273527
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This change adds line position tests for several yyerror calls in the
typechecker that are currently not tested in any way.
Untested yyerror calls were found by replacing them with
yerrorl(src.NoXPos, ...)
(thus destroying position information in the error), and then running
the test suite. No failures means no test coverage for the relevant
yyerror call.
For #19683
Change-Id: Iedb3d2f02141b332e9bfa76dbf5ae930ad2fddc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41477
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
CL 4313064 fixed its test case but did not address a
general enough problem:
type T1 struct { F *T2 }
type T2 T1
type T3 T2
could still end up copying the definition of T1 for T2
before T1 was done being evaluated, or T3 before T2
was done.
In order to propagate the updates correctly,
record a copy of an incomplete type for re-execution
once the type is completed. Roll back CL 4313064.
Fixes#3709.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev, lstoakes
https://golang.org/cl/6301059
To allow these types as map keys, we must fill in
equal and hash functions in their algorithm tables.
Structs or arrays that are "just memory", like [2]int,
can and do continue to use the AMEM algorithm.
Structs or arrays that contain special values like
strings or interface values use generated functions
for both equal and hash.
The runtime helper func runtime.equal(t, x, y) bool handles
the general equality case for x == y and calls out to
the equal implementation in the algorithm table.
For short values (<= 4 struct fields or array elements),
the sequence of elementwise comparisons is inlined
instead of calling runtime.equal.
R=ken, mpimenov
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5451105
The algtype-based test broke when algtype
got a bit more fine-grained, so replace with
an explicit check for the invalid key types.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5071041
