We weren't maintaining our ancestor node list correctly. This caused
us to fail to make AST repairs in certain cases. Now we are careful to
always append to the ancestors list when recursing.
Updates golang/go#34332.
Change-Id: I9b51ec70572170d9f592060d264c98b1f9720fb8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/209966
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Sometimes the prefix of the thing you want to complete is a keyword.
For example:
variance := 123
fmt.Println(var<>)
In this case the parser produces an *ast.BadExpr which breaks
completion. We now repair this BadExpr by replacing it with
an *ast.Ident named "var".
We also repair empty decls using a similar approach. This fixes cases
like:
var typeName string
type<> // want to complete to "typeName"
We also fix accidental keywords in selectors, such as:
foo.var<>
The parser produces a phantom "_" in place of the keyword, so we swap
it back for an *ast.Ident named "var".
In general, though, accidental keywords wreak havoc on the AST so we
can only do so much. There are still many cases where a keyword prefix
breaks completion. Perhaps in the future the parser can be
cursor/in-progress-edit aware and turn accidental keywords into
identifiers.
Fixesgolang/go#34332.
PS I tweaked nodeContains() to include n.End() to fix a test failure
against tip related to a change to go/parser. When a syntax error is
present, an *ast.BlockStmt's End() is now set to the block's final
statement's End() (earlier than what it used to be). In order for the
cursor pos to test "inside" the block in this case I had to relax the
End() comparison.
Change-Id: Ib45952cf086cc974f1578298df3dd12829344faa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/209438
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
For *ast.Ident completion requests, this checks the parent node to
see if the token begins a statement and then based on the path adds
possible keyword completion candidates. The test lists some cases where
this approach cannot provide completion candidates.
The biggest thing missing is keywords for file level declarations
Updates golang/go#34009
Change-Id: I9d9c0c1eb88e362613feca66d0eea6b88705b9b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/196664
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
