This CL adds rewrite rules for CSETM, CSINC, CSINV, and CSNEG. By adding
these rules, we can save one instruction.
For example,
func test(cond bool, a int) int {
if cond {
a++
}
return a
}
Before:
MOVD "".a+8(RSP), R0
ADD $1, R0, R1
MOVBU "".cond(RSP), R2
CMPW $0, R2
CSEL NE, R1, R0, R0
After:
MOVBU "".cond(RSP), R0
CMPW $0, R0
MOVD "".a+8(RSP), R0
CSINC EQ, R0, R0, R0
This patch is a copy of CL 285694. Co-authored-by: JunchenLi
<junchen.li@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ic1a79e8b8ece409b533becfcb7950f11e7b76f24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/302231
Trust: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
Run-TryBot: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Current many architectures use a rule along the lines of
// Canonicalize the order of arguments to comparisons - helps with CSE.
((CMP|CMPW) x y) && x.ID > y.ID => (InvertFlags ((CMP|CMPW) y x))
to normalize comparisons as much as possible for CSE. Replace the
ID comparison with something less variable across compiler changes.
This helps avoid spurious failures in some of the codegen-comparison
tests (though the current choice of comparison is sensitive to Op
ordering).
Two tests changed to accommodate modified instruction choice.
Change-Id: Ib35f450bd2bae9d4f9f7838ceaf7ec682bcf1e1a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280155
Trust: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Ensure that any comparison between two values has the same argument
order. This helps ensure that they can be eliminated during the
lowered CSE pass which will be particularly important if we eliminate
the Greater and Geq ops (see #37316).
Example:
CMP R0, R1
BLT L1
CMP R1, R0 // different order, cannot eliminate
BEQ L2
CMP R0, R1
BLT L1
CMP R0, R1 // same order, can eliminate
BEQ L2
This does have some drawbacks. Notably comparisons might 'flip'
direction in the assembly output after even small changes to the
code or compiler. It should help make optimizations more reliable
however.
compilecmp master -> HEAD
master (218f4572f5): text/template: make reflect.Value indirections more robust
HEAD (f1661fef3e): cmd/compile: canonicalize comparison argument order
platform: linux/amd64
file before after Δ %
api 6063927 6068023 +4096 +0.068%
asm 5191757 5183565 -8192 -0.158%
cgo 4893518 4901710 +8192 +0.167%
cover 5330345 5326249 -4096 -0.077%
fix 3417778 3421874 +4096 +0.120%
pprof 14889456 14885360 -4096 -0.028%
test2json 2848138 2844042 -4096 -0.144%
trace 11746239 11733951 -12288 -0.105%
total 132739173 132722789 -16384 -0.012%
Change-Id: I11736b3fe2a4553f6fc65018f475e88217fa22f9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220425
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL performs the branchelim optimization on WASM with its
select instruction. And the total size of pkg/js_wasm decreased
about 80KB by this optimization.
Change-Id: I868eb146120a1cac5c4609c8e9ddb07e4da8a1d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/190957
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Musiol <neelance@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Current compiler reverses operands to work around NaN in
"less than" and "less equal than" comparisons. But if we
want to use "FCMPD/FCMPS $(0.0), Fn" to do some optimization,
the workaround way does not work. Because assembler does
not support instruction "FCMPD/FCMPS Fn, $(0.0)".
This CL sets condition flags for floating-point comparisons
to resolve this problem.
Change-Id: Ia48076a1da95da64596d6e68304018cb301ebe33
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/164718
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
We want to issue loads as soon as possible, especially when they
are going to miss in the cache. Using a conditional move (CMOV) here:
i := ...
if cond {
i++
}
... = a[i]
means that we have to wait for cond to be computed before the load
is issued. Without a CMOV, if the branch is predicted correctly the
load can be issued in parallel with computing cond.
Even if the branch is predicted incorrectly, maybe the speculative
load is close to the real load, and we get a prefetch for free.
In the worst case, when the prediction is wrong and the address is
way off, we only lose by the time difference between the CMOV
latency (~2 cycles) and the mispredict restart latency (~15 cycles).
We only squash CMOVs that affect load addresses. Results of CMOVs
that are used for other things (store addresses, store values) we
use as before.
Fixes#26306
Change-Id: I82ca14b664bf05e1d45e58de8c4d9c775a127ca1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145717
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
This reverts commit 080187f4f7.
It broke build of golang.org/x/exp/shiny/iconvg
See issue 24395 for details
Change-Id: Ifd6134f6214e6cee40bd3c63c32941d5fc96ae8b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/100755
Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
