As a consistency check in devirtualization, when we determine `i` (of
interface type `I`) always has dynamic type `T`, we insert a type
assertion `i.(T)`. This emits an itab check for `go:itab.T,I`, but
it's always true (and so SSA optimizes it away).
However, if `I` is instead the generic interface type `I[T]`, then
`go:itab.T,I[int]` and `go:itab.T,I[go.shape.int]` are equivalent but
distinct itabs. And notably, we'll have originally created the
interface value using the former; but the (non-dynamic) TypeAssertExpr
created by devirtualization would ultimately emit a comparison against
the latter. This comparison would then evaluate false, leading to a
spurious type assertion panic at runtime.
The comparison is just meant as an extra safety check, so it should be
safe to just disable. But for now, it's simpler/safer to just punt on
devirtualization in this case. (The non-unified frontend doesn't
devirtualize this either.)
Change-Id: I6a8809bcfebc9571f32e289fa4bc6a8b0d21ca46
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/424774
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
This CL adds a test that method expressions where the receiver type is
a derived type and embeds a promoted method work correctly.
Change-Id: I2e7c96007b6d9e6f942dc14228970ac508ff5c15
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/422199
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
When types2 type checks a method expression or method value that
selects a type parameter method, the Selection.Index is indexed based
on the method's index within the type parameter's constraint
interface.
However, with a fully-stenciled implementation, naively using the
index would result in picking a method from the corresponding type
argument's full method set, which could select a different method.
Unified IR currently avoids this because it selects methods based on
name, not index; but experimenting with index-based selection revealed
that there are no test cases that would have caught this failure case.
Change-Id: Idbc39e1ee741714203d4749e47f5bc015af25020
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/421815
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The Go 1.18 frontend ICEs on select case clauses that involve an
implicit conversion.
Change-Id: I1c0865bf97d8b0a8fbddb0da43333e909df0d38a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/414878
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
These two tests fail with the 1.18 compiler frontend, because of
incomplete dictionary support. This CL adds the tests for Unified IR,
which currently handles them correctly, to make sure it doesn't repeat
the same errors.
Updates #53276.
Updates #53328.
Change-Id: I9f436495d28f2bc5707a17bd2527c86abacf91f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/411695
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
CL 338129 added getDictionaryType to get the dictionary type from the
specified dict param, but still using the one in info.dictParam, which
is wrong.
Fixes#51413
Change-Id: Ie13460c1e5751c4c5fc44479a44f6eed8b3b06e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/391994
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This test case is failing on the noopt builder, because it disables
inlining. Evidently the explicit -gcflags flag in all of our generics
tests was overriding the noopt builder's default mode.
This CL restores a noop -gcflags to get the builder green again until
the issue can be properly fixed.
Updates #51413.
Change-Id: I61d22a007105f756104ba690b73f1d68ce4be281
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/388894
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
The next CL will remove the -G flag, effectively hard-coding it to its
current default (-G=3).
Change-Id: Ib4743b529206928f9f1cca9fdb19989728327831
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/388534
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Type constraint satisfaction is interface implementation.
Adjusted a few error messages.
Change-Id: I4266af78e83131a76b1e3e44c847a21de760ac6e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/363839
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
In this case, we can't use an itab for doing a bound call, since we're
converting from an interface to an interface. We do a static or dynamic
type assert in new function assertToBound().
The dynamic type assert in assertToBound() is only needed if a bound is
parameterized. In that case, we must do a dynamic type assert, and
therefore need a dictionary entry for the type bound (see change in
getGfInfo). I'm not sure if we can somehow limit this case, since using
an interface as a type arg AND having the type bound of the type
arg be parameterized is a very unlikely case.
Had to add the TUNION case to parameterizedBy1() (which is only used for
extra checking).
Added a bunch of these test cases to 13.go, which now passes.
Change-Id: Ic22eed637fa879b5bbb46d36b40aaad6f90b9d01
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/339898
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL changes fixedbugs/issue30862.go into a "runindir" test so that
it can use '-goexperiment fieldtrack' and test that //go:nointerface
works with cmd/compile. In particular, this revealed that -G=3 and
unified IR did not handle it correctly.
This CL also fixes unified IR's support for //go:nointerface and adds
a test that checks that //go:nointerface, promoted methods, and
generics all interact as expected.
Updates #47045.
Change-Id: Ib8acff8ae18bf124520d00c98e8915699cba2abd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/332611
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Removed a case in transformCall() where we were setting a type on n,
which isn't needed, since noder2 already set the type of n. More
importantly, we are losing information, since the type of the results
may be a shape type, but the actual type of call is the known type
from types2, which may be a concrete type (in this case Zero[MyInt]).
That concrete type will then be used correctly if the concrete result is
converted to an interface.
If we are inlining the call to Zero[MyInt], we need to add an implicit
CONVNOP operation, since we are going to use the result variable
directly, which has a shape type. So, add an implicit CONVNOP to
remember that the known type is the concrete type.
Also cleaned up 14.go a bit, so it is more understandable. Renamed type
T to AnyInt, since T is used elsewhere as a type parameter. Reformatted
Zero function and added a comment.
Change-Id: Id917a2e054e0bbae9bd302232853fa8741d49b64
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/336430
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL includes multiple test cases that exercise unique failures
with -G=3 mode that did not affect unified IR mode. Most of these were
found over a period of about 3 hours of manual experimentation.
Thanks to Cuong Manh Le for test cases 11 and 12.
Updates #46704.
Change-Id: Ia2fa619536732b121b6c929329065c85b9384511
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/326169
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
