When we go from a branch block to a plain block, reset the
branch prediction bit. Downstream passes asssume that if the
branch prediction is set, then the block has 2 successors.
Fixes#23504
Change-Id: I2898ec002228b2e34fe80ce420c6939201c0a5aa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/88955
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
This replaces the contiguous heap arena mapping with a potentially
sparse mapping that can support heap mappings anywhere in the address
space.
This has several advantages over the current approach:
* There is no longer any limit on the size of the Go heap. (Currently
it's limited to 512GB.) Hence, this fixes#10460.
* It eliminates many failures modes of heap initialization and
growing. In particular it eliminates any possibility of panicking
with an address space conflict. This can happen for many reasons and
even causes a low but steady rate of TSAN test failures because of
conflicts with the TSAN runtime. See #16936 and #11993.
* It eliminates the notion of "non-reserved" heap, which was added
because creating huge address space reservations (particularly on
64-bit) led to huge process VSIZE. This was at best confusing and at
worst conflicted badly with ulimit -v. However, the non-reserved
heap logic is complicated, can race with other mappings in non-pure
Go binaries (e.g., #18976), and requires that the entire heap be
either reserved or non-reserved. We currently maintain the latter
property, but it's quite difficult to convince yourself of that, and
hence difficult to keep correct. This logic is still present, but
will be removed in the next CL.
* It fixes problems on 32-bit where skipping over parts of the address
space leads to mapping huge (and never-to-be-used) metadata
structures. See #19831.
This also completely rewrites and significantly simplifies
mheap.sysAlloc, which has been a source of many bugs. E.g., #21044,
#20259, #18651, and #13143 (and maybe #23222).
This change also makes it possible to allocate individual objects
larger than 512GB. As a result, a few tests that expected huge
allocations to fail needed to be changed to make even larger
allocations. However, at the moment attempting to allocate a humongous
object may cause the program to freeze for several minutes on Linux as
we fall back to probing every page with addrspace_free. That logic
(and this failure mode) will be removed in the next CL.
Fixes#10460.
Fixes#22204 (since it rewrites the code involved).
This slightly slows down compilebench and the x/benchmarks garbage
benchmark.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 184ms ± 1% 185ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.065 n=10+9)
Unicode 86.9ms ± 3% 86.3ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.631 n=10+10)
GoTypes 599ms ± 0% 602ms ± 0% +0.56% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Compiler 2.87s ± 1% 2.89s ± 1% +0.51% (p=0.002 n=9+10)
SSA 7.29s ± 1% 7.25s ± 1% ~ (p=0.182 n=10+9)
Flate 118ms ± 2% 118ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.113 n=9+9)
GoParser 147ms ± 1% 148ms ± 1% +1.07% (p=0.003 n=9+10)
Reflect 401ms ± 1% 404ms ± 1% +0.71% (p=0.003 n=10+9)
Tar 175ms ± 1% 175ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.604 n=9+10)
XML 209ms ± 1% 210ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.052 n=10+10)
(https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20171231.4)
name old time/op new time/op delta
Garbage/benchmem-MB=64-12 2.23ms ± 1% 2.25ms ± 1% +0.84% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
(https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20171231.3)
Relative to the start of the sparse heap changes (starting at and
including "runtime: fix various contiguous bitmap assumptions"),
overall slowdown is roughly 1% on GC-intensive benchmarks:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 183ms ± 1% 185ms ± 1% +1.32% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Unicode 84.9ms ± 2% 86.3ms ± 1% +1.65% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
GoTypes 595ms ± 1% 602ms ± 0% +1.19% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Compiler 2.86s ± 0% 2.89s ± 1% +0.91% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
SSA 7.19s ± 0% 7.25s ± 1% +0.75% (p=0.000 n=8+9)
Flate 117ms ± 1% 118ms ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
GoParser 146ms ± 2% 148ms ± 1% +1.48% (p=0.002 n=10+10)
Reflect 398ms ± 1% 404ms ± 1% +1.51% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Tar 173ms ± 1% 175ms ± 1% +1.17% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
XML 208ms ± 1% 210ms ± 1% +0.62% (p=0.011 n=10+10)
[Geo mean] 369ms 373ms +1.17%
(https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20180101.2)
name old time/op new time/op delta
Garbage/benchmem-MB=64-12 2.22ms ± 1% 2.25ms ± 1% +1.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
(https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20180101.3)
Change-Id: I5daf4cfec24b252e5a57001f0a6c03f22479d0f0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/85887
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
The scanner assumed that ~ really meant ^, which may be helpful when
coming from C. But ~ is not a valid Go token, and pretending that it
should be ^ can lead to confusing error messages. Better to be upfront
about it and complain about the invalid character in the first place.
This was code "inherited" from the original yacc parser which was
derived from a C compiler. It's 10 years later and we can probably
assume that people are less confused about C and Go.
Fixes#23587.
Change-Id: I8d8f9b55b0dff009b75c1530d729bf9092c5aea6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/94160
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Assume that an expression that is not a function call in a defer/go
statement is indeed a function that is just missing its invocation.
Report the error but continue with a sane syntax tree.
Fixes#23586.
Change-Id: Ib45ebac57c83b3e39ae4a1b137ffa291dec5b50d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/94156
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Previously, if we typechecked a statement like
var x bool = p1.f == p2.f && p1.g == p2.g
we would correctly update the '&&' node's type from 'untyped bool' to
'bool', but the '==' nodes would stay 'untyped bool'. This is
inconsistent, and caused consistency checks during walk to fail.
This CL doesn't pass toolstash because it seems to slightly affect the
register allocator's heuristics. (Presumably 'untyped bool's were
previously making it all the way through SSA?)
Fixes#23414.
Change-Id: Ia85f8cfc69b5ba35dfeb157f4edf57612ecc3285
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/94022
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Per the language spec clarification in https://golang.org/cl/14727.
Updates #12576
Updates #12621
Change-Id: I1e459c3c11a571bd29582761faacaa9ca3178ba6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/91895
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The sub-word shifts need to sign-extend before shifting, to avoid
bringing in data from higher in the argument.
Fixes#23812
Change-Id: I0a95a0b49c48f3b40b85765bb4a9bb492be0cd73
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/93716
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Fixes#23732
Disambiguate "too few" or "too many" values in struct
initializer messages by reporting the name of the literal.
After:
issue23732.go:27:3: too few values in Foo literal
issue23732.go:34:12: too many values in Bar literal
issue23732.go:40:6: too few values in Foo literal
issue23732.go:40:12: too many values in Bar literal
Change-Id: Ieca37298441d907ac78ffe960c5ab55741a362ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/93277
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Now that the buffered write barrier is implemented for all
architectures, we can remove the old eager write barrier
implementation. This CL removes the implementation from the runtime,
support in the compiler for calling it, and updates some compiler
tests that relied on the old eager barrier support. It also makes sure
that all of the useful comments from the old write barrier
implementation still have a place to live.
Fixes#22460.
Updates #21640 since this fixes the layering concerns of the write
barrier (but not the other things in that issue).
Change-Id: I580f93c152e89607e0a72fe43370237ba97bae74
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/92705
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When loading multiple elements of an array into a single register,
make sure we treat them as unsigned. When treated as signed, the
upper bits might all be set, causing the shift-or combo to clobber
the values higher in the register.
Fixes#23719.
Change-Id: Ic87da03e9bd0fe2c60bb214b99f846e4e9446052
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/92335
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
The fix is CL 91035.
Build only with gccgo at the moment, as it hits issue #23546.
Updates #23545.
Change-Id: I3a1367bb31b04773d31f71016f8fd7bd1855d7b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/89735
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The compiler allows code to have multiple differently-typed views of a
single argument. For instance, if we have
func f(x float64) {
y := *(*int64)(unsafe.Pointer(&x))
...
}
Then in SSA we get two OpArg ops, one with float64 type and one with
int64 type.
The compiler will try to reuse argument slots for spill slots. It
checks that the argument slot is dead by consulting an interference
graph.
When building the interference graph, we normally ignore cross-type
edges because the values on either end of that edge can't be allocated
to the same slot. (This is just a space-saving optimization.) This
rule breaks down when one of the values is an argument, because of the
multiple views described above. If we're spilling a float64, it is not
enough that the float64 version of x is dead; the int64 version of x
has to be dead also.
Remove the optimization of not recording interference edges if types
don't match. That optimization is incorrect if one of the values
connected by the edge is an argument.
Fixes#23522
Change-Id: I361f85d80fe3bc7249014ca2c3ec887c3dc30271
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/89335
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
A Select Op could produce a value with upper 32 bits NOT zeroed,
for example, Div32 is lowered to (Select0 (DIVL x y)).
In theory, we could look into the argument of a Select to decide
whether the upper bits are zeroed. As it is late in release cycle,
just disable this optimization for Select for now.
Fixes#23305.
Change-Id: Icf665a2af9ccb0a7ba0ae00c683c9e349638bf85
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/85736
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
My previous fix for issue 23179 was incomplete; it turns out that if
an unnamed parameter is below a specific size threshold, it gets
register-promoted away by the compiler (hence not encountered during
some parts of DWARF inline info processing), but if it is sufficiently
large, it is allocated to the stack as a named variable and treated as
a regular parameter by DWARF generation. Interestingly, something in
the ppc64le build of k8s causes an unnamed parameter to be retained
(where on amd64 it is deleted), meaning that this wasn't caught in my
amd64 testing.
The fix is to insure that "_" params are treated in the same way that
"~r%d" return temps are when matching up post-optimization inlined
routine params with pre-inlining declarations. I've also updated the
test case to include a "_" parameter with a very large size, which
also triggers the bug on amd64.
Fixes#23179.
Change-Id: I961c84cc7a873ad3f8f91db098a5e13896c4856e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/84975
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
The helper routine for returning pre-inlining parameter declarations
wasn't properly handling the case where you have more than one
parameter named "_" in a function signature; this triggered a map
collision later on when the function was inlined and DWARF was
generated for the inlined routine instance.
Fixes#23179.
Change-Id: I12e5d6556ec5ce08e982a6b53666a4dcc1d22201
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/84755
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
We can't currently inline functions that contain closures anyway, so
just delete this budgeting code for now. Re-enable once we can (if
ever) inline functions with nested closures.
Updates #15561.
Fixes#23093.
Change-Id: Idc5f8e042ccfcc8921022e58d3843719d4ab821e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/83538
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Pointer arithemetic is done mod 2^32 on 386, so we can just
drop the high bits of any large constant offsets.
The bounds check will make sure wraparounds are never observed.
Fixes#21655
Change-Id: I68ae5bbea9f02c73968ea2b21ca017e5ecb89223
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82675
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Make sure that when we're assigning to a map, we evaluate the
right-hand side before we attempt to insert into the map.
We used to evaluate the left-hand side to a pointer-to-slot-in-bucket
(which as a side effect does len(m)++), then evaluate the right-hand side,
then do the assignment. That clearly isn't correct when the right-hand side
might panic.
Fixes#22881
Change-Id: I42a62870ff4bf480568c9bdbf0bb18958962bdf0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81817
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The DWARF inline info generation hooks weren't properly
handling unused auto vars in certain cases, triggering an assert (now
fixed). Also with this change, introduce a new autom "flavor" to
use for autom entries that are added to insure that a specific
auto type makes it into the linker (this is a follow-on to the fix
for 22941).
Fixes#22962.
Change-Id: I7a2d8caf47f6ca897b12acb6a6de0eb25f5cac8f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81557
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The code that generates the list of DWARF variables for a function
(params and autos) will emit a "no-location" entry in the DWARF for a
user var that appears in the original pre-optimization version of the
function but is no longer around when optimization is complete. The
intent is that if a GDB user types "print foo" (where foo has been
optimized out), the response will be "<optimized out>" as opposed to
"there is no such variable 'foo'). This change fixes said code to
include vars on the autom list for the function, to insure that the
type symbol for the variable makes it to the linker.
Fixes#22941.
Change-Id: Id29f1f39d68fbb798602dfd6728603040624fc41
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81415
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
ORANGE node's Right node is the expression it is ranging over,
which is evaluated before the loop. In the escape analysis,
we should walk this node without loop depth incremented.
Fixes#21709.
Change-Id: Idc1e4c76e39afb5a344d85f6b497930a488ce5cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/80740
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
For "type T = U" we were accidentally emitting a #define for "U__size"
instead of "T__size".
Fixes#22877.
Change-Id: I5ed6757d697753ed6d944077c16150759f6e1285
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/80759
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The signature of the mapassign_fast* routines need to distinguish
the pointerness of their key argument. If the affected routines
suspend part way through, the object pointed to by the key might
get garbage collected because the key is typed as a uint{32,64}.
This is not a problem for mapaccess or mapdelete because the key
in those situations do not live beyond the call involved. If the
object referenced by the key is garbage collected prematurely, the
code still works fine. Even if that object is subsequently reallocated,
it can't be written to the map in time to affect the lookup/delete.
Fixes#22781
Change-Id: I0bbbc5e9883d5ce702faf4e655348be1191ee439
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/79018
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Improve the error message for wrong
case-field names in composite literals,
by mentioning the correct field name.
Given the program:
package main
type it struct {
ID string
}
func main() {
i1 := &it{id: "Bar"}
}
just like we do for usage of fields, we now
report wrongly cased fields as hints to give:
ts.go:8:14: unknown field 'id' in struct literal of type it (but does have ID)
instead of before:
ts.go:8:14: unknown field 'id' in struct literal of type it
Fixes#22794
Change-Id: I18cd70e75817025cb1df083503cae306e8d659fd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/78545
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This test fails on 1.9.2, but is ok on tip.
CL 77331 has both the 1.9.2 fix and this test, and is on the 1.9 release branch.
This CL is just the test, and is on HEAD. The buggy code doesn't exist on tip.
Update #22683
Change-Id: I04a24bd6c2d3068e18ca81da3347e2c1366f4447
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/77332
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Also, with this change, error locations don't print absolute positions
in [] brackets following positions relative to line directives. To get
the absolute positions as well, specify the -L flag.
Fixes#22660.
Change-Id: I9ecfa254f053defba9c802222874155fa12fee2c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/77090
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Plain blocks that contain only uninteresting instructions
(that do not have reliable Pos information themselves)
need to have their Pos left unset so that they can
inherit it from their successors. The "uninteresting"
test was not properly applied and not properly defined.
OpFwdRef does not appear in the ssa.html debugging output,
but at the time of the test these instructions did appear,
and it needs to be part of the test.
Fixes#22365.
Change-Id: I99e5b271acd8f6bcfe0f72395f905c7744ea9a02
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74252
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
They could get picked up by reflect code, yielding the wrong type.
Fixes#22605
Change-Id: Ie11fb361ca7f3255e662037b3407565c8f0a2c4c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76315
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Be more pessimistic when parsing if/switch/for headers for better error
messages when things go wrong.
Fixes#22581.
Change-Id: Ibb99925291ff53f35021bc0a59a4c9a7f695a194
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76290
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Updates #21317
@mdempsky fixed issue #21317 with CL 66810,
so lock a test in to ensure we don't regress.
The test is manual for now before test/run.go
has support for matching column numbers so do
it old school and match expected output after
an exec.
Change-Id: I6c2a66ddf04248f79d17ed7033a3280d50e41562
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76150
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Updates #22389
@mdempsky's CL 70850 fixed the unnecessary
compile stack trace printing during ICE diagnostics.
This CL adds a test to lock in this behavior.
Change-Id: I9ce49923c80b78cb8c0bb5dc4af3c860a43d63ba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74630
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Instead of trying to validate map key types eagerly in some
cases, delay their validation to the end of type-checking,
when we all type information is present.
Passes go build -toolexec 'toolstash -cmp' -a std .
Fixes#21273.
Fixes#21657.
Change-Id: I532369dc91c6adca1502d6aa456bb06b57e6c7ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/75310
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The test for #18902 reads the assembly stream to be sure
that the line number does not change too often (this is an
indication that debugging the code will be unpleasant and
that the compiler is probably getting line numbers "wrong").
It checks that it is getting "enough" input, but the
compiler has gotten enough better since the test was written
that it now fails for lack of enough input. The old
threshould was 200 instructions, the new one is 150 (the
minimum observed input is on arm64 with 184 instructions).
Fixes#22494.
Change-Id: Ibba7e9ff4ab6a7be369e5dd5859d150b7db94653
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74357
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
KeepAlive needs to introduce a use of the spill of the
value it is keeping alive. Without that, we don't guarantee
that the spill dominates the KeepAlive.
This bug was probably introduced with the code to move spills
down to the dominator of the restores, instead of always spilling
just after the value itself (CL 34822).
Fixes#22458.
Change-Id: I94955a21960448ffdacc4df775fe1213967b1d4c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74210
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
...because that's an illegal addressing mode.
I double-checked handling of this code, and 387 is the only
place where this check is missing.
Fixes#22429
Change-Id: I2284fe729ea86251c6af2f04076ddf7a5e66367c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/73551
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
If n.Type==nil after typechecking, then we should have already
reported a more useful error somewhere else. Just return 0 in
evalunsafe without trying to do anything else that's likely to cause
problems.
Also, further split out issue7525.go into more test files, because
cmd/compile reports at most one typechecking loop per compilation
unit.
Fixes#22351.
Change-Id: I3ebf505f72c48fcbfef5ec915606224406026597
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/72251
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Fine-tune skipping of tokens after missing closing parentheses in lists.
Fixes#22164.
Change-Id: I575d86e21048cd40340a2c08399e8b0deec337cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71250
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Previously, we were treating cross-package function calls as free for
inlining budgeting.
In theory, we should be able to recompute InlCost from the
exported/reimported function bodies. However, that process mutates the
structure of the Node AST enough that it doesn't preserve InlCost. To
avoid unexpected issues, just record and restore InlCost in the export
data.
Fixes#19261.
Change-Id: Iac2bc0d32d4f948b64524aca657051f9fc96d92d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70151
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
