This is a subset of https://golang.org/cl/20022 with only the copyright
header lines, so the next CL will be smaller and more reviewable.
Go policy has been single space after periods in comments for some time.
The copyright header template at:
https://golang.org/doc/contribute.html#copyright
also uses a single space.
Make them all consistent.
Change-Id: Icc26c6b8495c3820da6b171ca96a74701b4a01b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20111
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
If the parsing of an operand completes but the parser thinks there
is more to read, return an "expected end of operand" error message
instead of "expected EOF." This also removes extra "asm: " prefixes
in error strings since "asm: " is already set as the global log
prefix.
Fixes#14071
Change-Id: I7d621c1aea529a0eca3bcba032359bd25b3e1080
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19731
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Only tests do this, provide them a hook to disable freeing
after flush.
Change-Id: I810c6c51414a93f476a18ba07b807e16092bf8cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19907
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
3DNotAnymore!
These only ever existed on AMD (not Intel) processors,
and AMD cancelled support for them in August 2010.
Change-Id: Ia362259add9d4f5788fd151fb373f91288677407
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19611
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Semi-regular merge from tip to dev.ssa.
Two fixes:
1) Mark selectgo as not returning. This caused problems
because there are no VARKILL ops on the selectgo path,
causing things to be marked live that shouldn't be.
2) Tell the amd64 assembler that addressing modes like
name(SP)(AX*4) are ok.
Change-Id: I9ca81c76391b1a65cc47edc8610c70ff1a621913
Was part of #13822 but not in the first message, so I missed it.
Fixes#13822 again.
Change-Id: I775004fa8d47b6af293124605521ec396573e267
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18900
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Add test for assembly errors, to verify fix.
Make sure invalid instruction errors are printed just once
(was printing them once per span iteration, so typically twice).
Fixes#13282.
Change-Id: Id5f66f80a80b3bc4832e00084b0a91f1afec7f8f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18858
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Add amd64 instructions I promised to add for Go 1.6
at the beginning of January.
These may be the last instructions added by hand.
I intend to generate the whole set mechanically for Go 1.7.
Fixes#13822.
Change-Id: I8c6bae2efd25f717f9ec750402e50f408a911d2b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18853
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Use the standard names, for discoverability.
Use the standard register arguments, for correctness.
Implement all possible arguments, for completeness.
Enable the corresponding tests now that everything is standard.
Update the uses in package runtime.
Fixes#14068.
Change-Id: I8e1af9a41e7d02d98c2a82af3d4cdb3e9204824f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18852
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Generated by x86test, from https://golang.org/cl/18842
(still in progress).
The commented out lines are either missing or misspelled
or incorrectly handled instructions.
For #4816, #8037, #13822, #14068, #14069.
Change-Id: If309310c97d9d2a3c71fc64c51d4a957e9076ab7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18850
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Not much testing yet, but the test now exists.
Another step toward #13822.
Change-Id: Idb2b06bf53a6113c83008150b4c0b631bb195279
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18844
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Also, remove output file if there are encoding errors.
The extra reports are convenient.
Removing the output file is very important.
Noticed while testing.
Change-Id: I0fab17d4078f93c5a0d6d1217d8d9a63ac789696
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18845
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Instead of two parallel files that look almost identical,
mark the expected differences in the original file.
The annotations being added here keep the tests passing,
but they also make clear a number of printing or parsing
errors that were not as easily seen when the data was
split across two files.
Fix a few diagnostic problems in cmd/internal/obj as well.
A step toward #13822.
Change-Id: I997172681ea6fa7da915ff0f0ab93d2b76f8dce2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18823
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Transactional memory, will later be used for semaphore implementation.
Nacl not supported yet.
Change-Id: Ic18453dcaa08d07bb217c0b95461584f007d518b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16479
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
There was no documentation produced by "go doc cmd/asm".
Follow the style set by cmd/compile.
Fixes#13148.
Change-Id: I02e08ce2e7471f855bfafbbecee98ffdb7096995
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16997
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Error doesn't take a format string and appends its own newline. Phrase
the error like the other ones.
Change-Id: Ic3af857e5d4890207c74a6eb59a0d1067b503e1b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16420
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
A panic was in place for an impossible condition that turned
out to be possible if one used a macro to define a macro.
Another go-fuzz "win".
Fixes#12654.
Change-Id: I0a7bb0f0eabb260c986bf7a2288860c78d8db1af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14777
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Add some error catches to prevent looping at EOF.
Also give better diagnostics.
Also add tests for these cases.
Fixes#12656.
Change-Id: I1355fc149b71c868e740bfa53de29c25d160777d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14710
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
On amd64, the program
TEXT foo0(SB),7,$-8
ADDQ R520, R1
RET
used to trigger this error because R520 was being passed through to obj:
asm: doasm: notfound ft=23 tt=23 00000 (x.s:2) ADDQ 0, 0 23 23
Now it gets this one, as it is indeed a parse error:
x.s:2: illegal addressing mode for symbol R520
This couldn't be fixed until #12632 had been fixed for arm64.
Fixes#12470.
Change-Id: I19830c4ae9337887b93f85d9a239e2b89dbb2219
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14691
Reviewed-by: Aram Hăvărneanu <aram@mgk.ro>
Add CS as an alias for HS, and CC as an alias for LO, otherwise
CSINV CS, R1, R2, R3
was interpreted as
CSINV 0, R1, R2, R3
Also fix the corresponding faulty test.
Fixes#12632
Updates #12470
Change-Id: I974cfc7e5ced682d4754ba09b0b102cb08a46567
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14680
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
More protection against random input bytes.
Fixes#12614.
Change-Id: Ie9f817de1376a10bb80b22ecee3bae4f1d26cc6c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14563
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
One (12466) was an actual logic error, backing up when there was
nothing there. The others were due to continuing to process an
instruction when it cannot work.
Methodically stop assembling an instruction when it's not going to
succeed.
Fixes#12466.
Fixes#12467.
Fixes#12468.
Change-Id: I88c568f2b9c1a8408043b2ac5a78f5e2ffd62abd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14498
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
The code parsing register lists involves an inner loop on
each range defined by the lo,hi bounds. The condition on
this loop (for lo<=hi) is fragile, because the bounds
are unsigned 16 bits numbers.
In some corner cases, the calculated upper bound is 2^16-1
leading to an infinite loop.
Parsing operand `[):[o-FP` results in:
- an infinite loop for non ARM architectures
- the generation of almost 2^16 errors for the ARM architecture
(which are then ignored)
This CL improves the code in 3 ways:
- bail out early when parsing non R prefixed registers
- make sure the register index is never negative
- make sure the number of iterations is limited by the
maximum size of the range (as a defensive measure).
Fixes#12469
Change-Id: Ib1e7e36fb8ad5a3a52c50fc6219d3cfe2b39cc34
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14314
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The lexer needs to process all #if[n]defs, even those found when processing is
disabled by a preceding failed conditional, or the first #endif in something
like:
#ifdef <undefined>
#ifdef whatever
#endif
#endif
terminates the first #ifdef and the second causes an error. And then the
processing of the inner #ifdefs needs to ignore their argument when they are
disabled by an outer failed condition.
Change-Id: Iba259498f1e16042f5b7580b9c000bb0599733d0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14253
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
These instructions are special cases that were missed in the translation.
The second argument must go into the Reg field not the To field.
Fixes#12458
For Go 1.5.1
Change-Id: Iad57c60c7e38e3bcfafda483ed5037ce670e8816
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14183
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The parser tries to read as much information as possible,
issuing some errors when needed. Errors generally do not
stop the parsing.
With some pathological input, it may result in various
panics when the error message itself is built, or when the
next operand is parsed. It happens while parsing
pseudo-instructions.
For instance, the following lines all generate a panic:
TEXT
TEXT%
TEXT 1,1
TEXT $"toto", 0, $1
FUNCDATA
DATA 0
DATA(0),1
FUNCDATA(SB
GLOBL 0, 1
PCDATA 1
Added corresponding tests.
Introduced a writer in the parser to capture error messages
for testing purpose. It defaults to os.Stderr.
Added an explicit check when symbol names cannot be displayed.
Interrupted parsing early when the number of operands is wrong for
pseudo-instructions.
Note that the last point is a change of behavior, because some
operands will not get parsed anymore in case of early error.
IMO, it is acceptable, because only the first error of the line
is considered anyway. If it is not acceptable, it can probably
be improved at the price of a more verbose CL.
Fixes#11765Fixes#11760Fixes#11759
Change-Id: I9602a848132e358a1bccad794d7555e0823970dd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13925
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Update #10994
CASE and BCASE were used by 5c in switch statements, cmd/compile
does not use them.
Change-Id: I7a578c461b52b94690e35460926849b28971b770
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14009
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
For ARM machines, the assembler supports list of registers
operands such as [R1,R2].
A list missing a ']' results in the parser issuing many errors
and consuming all the tokens. At EOF (i.e. end of the line),
it still loops.
Normally, a counter is maintained to make sure the parser
stops after 10 errors. However, multiple errors occuring on the
same line are simply ignored. Only the first one is reported.
At most one error per line is accounted.
Missing ']' in a register list therefore results in an
infinite loop.
Fixed the parser by explicitly checking for ']' to interrupt
this loops
In the operand tests, also fixed a wrong entry which I think was
not set on purpose (but still led to a successful result).
Fixes#11764
Change-Id: Ie87773388ee0d21b3a2a4cb941d4d911d0230ba4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13920
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The parser treats (R1+R2) on ppc64 the same as (R1,R2) on arm,
but it is not strictly a "register pair". Improve the text.
No semantic change.
Change-Id: Ib8b14881c6467add0d53150a901c01e962afb28b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12212
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
They were missing from the inputs.
Unfortunately this means the .out files all have wrong line numbers,
but they are easy to update.
Change-Id: I254742f24ab803421f34d52d13b9afa93674edd6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11958
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Also add a couple more errors, such as modulo with a zero divisor.
Change-Id: If24c95477f7ae86cf4aef5b3460e9ec249ea5ae2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11535
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
There are two conditions to worry about:
1) The shift count cannot be negative. Since the evaluator uses unsigned
arithmetic throughout, this means checking that the high bit of
the shift count is always off, which is done by converting to int64
and seeing if the result is negative.
2) For right shifts, the value cannot be negative. We don't want a
high bit in the value because right shifting a value depends on the
sign, and for clarity we always want unsigned shifts.
Next step is to build some testing infrastructure for the parser.
Change-Id: I4c46c79989d02c107fc64954403fc18613763f1d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11326
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The change that "fixed" LSH was incorrect, and the fix for RSH was poor.
Make both use a correct, simple test: if the 64-bit value as a signed
integer is negative, it's an error.
Really fixes#11278.
Change-Id: I72cca03d7ad0d64fd649fa33a9ead2f31bd2977b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11325
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
In the parser, the shift value is always a uint64.
Change-Id: I9b50295a9f7d174ed1f6f9baf78ec0ed43db417f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11322
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
These were found by grepping the comments from the go code and feeding
the output to aspell.
Change-Id: Id734d6c8d1938ec3c36bd94a4dbbad577e3ad395
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10941
Reviewed-by: Aamir Khan <syst3m.w0rm@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
That which cannot happen has not happened.
No immediate changes to Addr or Prog size.
Change-Id: I4cb9315f2c9f5f92eda340bfc4abb46395fa467f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10513
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
It is almost never set and Addr is large, so having the full struct
in the Prog wastes memory most of the time.
Before (on a 64-bit system):
$ sizeof -p cmd/internal/obj Addr Prog
Addr 80
Prog 376
$
After:
$ sizeof -p cmd/internal/obj Addr Prog
Addr 80
Prog 304
$
Change-Id: I491f201241f87543964a7d0f48b85830759be9d0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10457
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
It shrinks Prog type from 448 bytes down to 376 bytes on amd64.
It also makes sense, because I don't know of any modern architecture
that have instructions which can write to two destinations, none of
which is a register (even x86 doesn't have such instructions).
Change-Id: I3061f1c9ac93d79ee2b92ecb9049641d0e0f6300
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10330
Reviewed-by: Aram Hăvărneanu <aram@mgk.ro>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This CL removes the remaining visible uses of the "architecture letter" concept.
(They are no longer in tool names nor in source directory names.)
Because the architecture letter concept is now gone, delete GOCHAR
from "go env" output, and change go/build.ArchChar to return an
error always.
The architecture letter is still used in the compiler and linker sources
as a clumsy architecture enumeration, but that use is not visible to
Go users and can be cleaned up separately.
Change-Id: I4d97a38f372003fb610c9c5241bea440d9dbeb8d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10289
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
