Call copy with as large buffer as possible to reduce the
number of function calls.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkBytesRepeat 540 162 -70.00%
BenchmarkStringsRepeat 563 177 -68.56%
LGTM=josharian
R=golang-codereviews, josharian, dave, dvyukov
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/90550043
I fixed this data race regression in two ways: in net/http itself, and also
partially reverting the change from https://golang.org/cl/77580046 .
Previously a Read from a strings.Reader or bytes.Reader returning 0 bytes
would not be a memory write. After 77580046 it was. This reverts that back
in case others depended on that. Also adds tests.
Fixes#7856
LGTM=ruiu, iant
R=iant, ruiu
CC=golang-codereviews, gri
https://golang.org/cl/94740044
CL 77580046 caused a data race issue with tests that assumes ReadAt
does not mutate receiver. This patch partially revert CL 77580046
to fix it.
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/77900043
UnreadRune should return an error if previous operation is not
ReadRune.
Fixes#7579.
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/77580046
utf8.RuneLen returns -1 for an invalid rune. In that case we
need to extend the internal buffer at least by 3 for \uFFFD.
Fixes#7577.
LGTM=iant
R=golang-codereviews, iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/77420044
Add coverage for some uncovered bytes methods. The increase in actual coverage is disapointing small.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/13651044
Per suggestion from Russ in February. Then strings.IndexByte
can be implemented in terms of the shared code in pkg runtime.
Update #3751
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12289043
Phrases like "returns whether or not the image is opaque" could be
describing what the function does (it always returns, regardless of
the opacity) or what it returns (a boolean indicating the opacity).
Even when the "or not" is missing, the phrasing is bizarre.
Go with "reports whether", which is still clunky but at least makes
it clear we're talking about the return value.
These were edited by hand. A few were cleaned up in other ways.
R=golang-dev, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/11699043
This benchmark verifies that CL #8173043 reduces time spent
sliding the Buffer's contents.
Results without and with CL #8173043 applied:
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkBufferFullSmallReads 755336 175054 -76.82%
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/8174043
Also added a new benchmark from the same test:
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkBufferNotEmptyWriteRead 2643698 709189 -73.17%
Fixes#5154
R=golang-dev, r, gri
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/8164043
Avoids printing it every time we ask a question about the package from
the command line.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7789048
Before and after:
BenchmarkTrimSpace 20000000 81.3 ns/op
BenchmarkTrimSpace 50000000 58.0 ns/op
(most whitespace trimming is ASCII whitespace)
Same optimization appeared a handful of other places
in this file, but not here.
R=golang-dev, dave
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7305063
Everybody either gets confused and thinks this is
TrimLeft/TrimRight or does this by hand which gets
repetitive looking.
R=rsc, kevlar
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7239044
The assembly offsets were converted mechanically using
code.google.com/p/rsc/cmd/asmlint. The instruction
changes were done by hand.
Fixes#2188.
R=iant, r, bradfitz, remyoudompheng
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6550058
Allows a client to pre-allocate buffer space that is known to be necessary,
avoiding expensive reallocations.
R=gri, gri, adg
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6392061
