In CL 253457, we did the same fix for direct function calls. But for
method calls, the receiver argument also need to be passed through the
wrapper function, which we are not doing so the compiler crashes with
the code in #44415.
It will be nicer if we can rewrite OCALLMETHOD to normal OCALLFUNC, but
that will be for future CL. The passing receiver argument to wrapper
function is easier for backporting to go1.16 branch.
Fixes#44415
Change-Id: I03607a64429042c6066ce673931db9769deb3124
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/296490
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
This reverts commit CL 294849.
Reason for revert: this doesn't actually fix the issue, as revealed
by the noopt builder's failures.
Change-Id: Ib4ea9ceb4d75e46b3b91ec348b365fd8c83316ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/296629
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
In CL 253457, we did the same fix for direct function calls. But for
method calls, the receiver argument also need to be passed through the
wrapper function, which we are not doing so the compiler crashes with
the code in #44415.
As we already rewrite t.M(...) into T.M(t, ...) during walkCall1, to fix
this, we can do the same trick in wrapCall, so the receiver argument
will be treated as others.
Fixes#44415
Change-Id: I396182983c85d9c5e4494657da79d25636e8a079
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/294849
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Before generating wrapper function, turn any f(a, b, []T{c, d, e}...)
calls back into f(a, b, c, d, e). This allows the existing code for
recognizing and specially handling unsafe.Pointer->uintptr conversions
to correctly handle variadic arguments too.
Fixes#41460.
Change-Id: I0a1255abdd1bd5dafd3e89547aedd4aec878394c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/263297
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
The revised test now checks that unsafe-uintptr correctly works for
variadic uintptr parameters too, and the CL corrects the code so this
code compiles again.
The pointers are still not kept alive properly. That will be fixed by
a followup CL. But this CL at least allows programs not affected by
that to build again.
Updates #24991.
Updates #41460.
Change-Id: If4c39167b6055e602213fb7522c4f527c43ebda9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/255877
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
So we can insert theses OVARLIVE nodes right after OpStaticCall in SSA.
This helps fixing issue that unsafe-uintptr arguments are not kept alive
during return statement, or can be kept alive longer than expected.
Fixes#24491
Change-Id: Ic04a5d1bbb5c90dcfae65bd95cdd1da393a66800
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/254397
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
