This was released in 1.21, release noted in CL 524675.
(I think it was missed originally and then and backported,
but then somehow incorrectly made it into the 1.22 dragnet.)
Change-Id: I45f3182f14f77f8b92a3b7d5ef0011b71fd3c176
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546675
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Bypass: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
For #61422.
Change-Id: Ie0d3c05752d29aa65983add85935d2505560ec55
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546029
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Previously, its value was unset (NoPos), but the correct
value is a point after the signature (FuncType.End) and
before the body.
Also, fix a bug in Scope.Innermost whereby it would return
the wrong (outer) scope when the query position was in
the FuncType portion of a Func{Decl,Lit}.
The fix is to set the scope's pos/end to those of the
complete Func{Decl,Lit}. This is now documented at
Info.Scopes, along with other missing information.
Also, fix a bug in the go/types (but not types2) scope
test, in which comments were discarded by the parser,
causing the entire test to be a no-op (!).
Also, make failures of TestScopeLookupParent more
informative.
Also, add a release note about the change in behavior.
Fixes#64292Fixes#64295
Change-Id: Ib681f59d1b0b43de977666db08302d7524d3305f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544035
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
See CL 514907
Change-Id: Ieba2d7737115c66990b0ea7629033e787a99be93
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545655
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ludi Rehak <ludi317@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
For #61422.
Change-Id: I0e091c30a445dbc55054c31837c6f051fea3c07d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544537
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Go 1.21 and earlier do not understand this line, causing
"go mod vendor" of //go:build go1.22-tagged code that
uses this feature to fail.
The solution is to include the go/build change to skip over
the line in Go 1.22 (making "go mod vendor" from Go 1.22 onward
work with this change) and then wait to deploy the cgo change
until Go 1.23, at which point Go 1.21 and earlier will be unsupported.
For #56378.
Fixes#63293.
Change-Id: Ifa08b134eac5a6aa15d67dad0851f00e15e1e58b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/539235
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Change-Id: I11d0947d6d2ffa91745c8e36a3984ffee85abbd0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/528896
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The upcoming built-in zero value provides an idiomatic way
to test for zero by comparing to the zero literal: v == zero.
The reflect package is meant to provide a programmatic way to perform
operations that the Go language itself provides.
Thus, it seems prudent that reflect.ValueOf(&v).Elem().IsZero() is
identical to v == zero.
This change alters the behavior of Value.IsZero in two concrete ways:
* negative zero is identical to zero
* blank fields in a struct are ignored
Prior to this change, we were already in an inconsistent state
due to a regression introduced by CL 411478.
The new behavior was already the case for comparable composite types.
This change makes it consistent for all other types
(in particular incomparable composite types and standalone numbers).
Updates #61372Fixes#61827
Change-Id: Id23fb97eb3b8921417cc75a1d3ead963e22dc3d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/517777
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
For #56378
Change-Id: I0c9c662c6d765cad6f7bf17fdd648db8d73e429b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/522937
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Bypass: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
For #60370.
Change-Id: Idae906ec7027be6d95f78bf43f7ce8f9d07e6c00
GitHub-Last-Rev: c645f0cf82
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#62033
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/519555
TryBot-Bypass: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
