I'm not sure how the regtest didn't catch this - is it possible that
it could unmarshal a single string a slice of string? Either way, I'd
like to get the fix in quicker - I'll try to add more regtests for this
later.
Also, validate the upgrade results more thoroughly.
Change-Id: I812a3fecd9f0642a1408c0a9c0376bb98d50b397
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/245065
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
The logic for extracting a function is quite signficant, and the code
is expensive enough that we should only call it when requested by the
user. This means that we should support extracting through a command
rather than text edits in the code action.
To that end, we create a new struct for commands. Features like extract
variable and extract function can supply functions to determine if they
are relevant to the given range, and if so, to generate their text
edits. source.Analyzers now point to Commands, rather than
SuggestedFixFuncs. The "canExtractVariable" and "canExtractFunction"
functions still need improvements, but I think that can be done in a
follow-up.
Change-Id: I9ec894c5abdbb28505a0f84ad7c76aa50977827a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/244598
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
A bunch of options are added to enable long-running performance-oriented
tests in existing directories. They will be used in a later CL to
implement a simple stress test, as an example of what is possible.
Change-Id: I531b201b415362ea135978238b3d64b903226359
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/244440
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
These are commands whose changes should be reflected in the existing
go.mod file, as they do not provide edits. Add a third way of running
the go command, explicitly without -modfile. Update the regression test
accordingly.
Change-Id: I866b5db83b504fae190e58c306c01a7a4296672d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/239200
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Revert https://golang.org/cl/234480, which was unnecessary, and move it
to a more appropriate file.
Change-Id: I3f5a3eccaf0ffe324fee8e27945a2e5ece2ff12c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/238597
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Some code lenses may be undesirable for certain users or editors -- for
example a code lens that runs tests, when VSCode already supports this
functionality outside of the LSP. To handle such situations, support
configuring code lenses via a new 'codelens' gopls option.
Add support for code lens in regtests, and use this to test the new
configuration. To achieve this, thread through a new 'EditorConfig' type
that configures the fake editor's LSP session. It made sense to move the
test Env overlay onto this config object as well.
While looking at them, document some types in source.Options.
Change-Id: I961077422a273829c5cbd83c3b87fae29f77eeda
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/232680
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
