Retrying CL 222782, with a fix that will hopefully stop the random crashing.
The issue with the previous CL is that it does pointer arithmetic
in a way that may briefly generate an out-of-bounds pointer. If an
interrupt happens to occur in that state, the referenced object may
be collected incorrectly.
Suppose there was code that did s[x+c]. The previous CL had a rule
to the effect of ptr + (x + c) -> c + (ptr + x). But ptr+x is not
guaranteed to point to the same object as ptr. In contrast,
ptr+(x+c) is guaranteed to point to the same object as ptr, because
we would have already checked that x+c is in bounds.
For example, strconv.trim used to have this code:
MOVZX -0x1(BX)(DX*1), BP
CMPL $0x30, AL
After CL 222782, it had this code:
LEAL 0(BX)(DX*1), BP
CMPB $0x30, -0x1(BP)
An interrupt between those last two instructions could see BP pointing
outside the backing store of the slice involved.
It's really hard to actually demonstrate a bug. First, you need to
have an interrupt occur at exactly the right time. Then, there must
be no other pointers to the object in question. Since the interrupted
frame will be scanned conservatively, there can't even be a dead
pointer in another register or on the stack. (In the example above,
a bug can't happen because BX still holds the original pointer.)
Then, the object in question needs to be collected (or at least
scanned?) before the interrupted code continues.
This CL needs to handle load combining somewhat differently than CL 222782
because of the new restriction on arithmetic. That's the only real
difference (other than removing the bad rules) from that old CL.
This bug is also present in the amd64 rewrite rules, and we haven't
seen any crashing as a result. I will fix up that code similarly to
this one in a separate CL.
Update #37881
Change-Id: I5f0d584d9bef4696bfe89a61ef0a27c8d507329f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/225798
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The "runindir" tests used "go run", but relied on relative imports
(which are not supported by "go run" in module mode). Instead, such
tests must use fully-qualified imports, which require either a go.mod
file (in module mode) or that the package be in an appropriate
subdirectory of GOPATH/src (in GOPATH mode).
To set up such a directory, we use yet another copy of the same
overlayDir function currently found in the misc subdirectory of this
repository.
Fixes#33912
Updates #30228
Change-Id: If3d7ea2f7942ba496d98aaaf24a90bcdcf4df9f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/225205
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The load and test instructions compare the given value
against zero and will produce a condition code indicating
one of the following scenarios:
0: Result is zero
1: Result is less than zero
2: Result is greater than zero
3: Result is not a number (NaN)
The instruction can be used to simplify floating point comparisons
against zero, which can enable further optimizations.
This CL also reduces the size of .text section of math.test binary by around
0.7 KB (in hexadecimal, from 1358f0 to 135620).
Change-Id: I33cb714f0c6feebac7a1c46dfcc735e7daceff9c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/209159
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
riscv64 now has atomic intrinsics, so re-enable the atomic intrinsic tests.
Fixes#36765
Change-Id: I838f27570a94d7fa5774c43f1ca5f4df2ca104cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/223560
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This reverts commit CL 222782.
Reason for revert: Reverting to see if 386 errors go away
Update #37881
Change-Id: I74f287404c52414db1b6ff1649effa4ed9e5cc0c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/225218
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Rolling back portions of CL 222782 to see if that helps
issue #37881 any.
Update #37881
Change-Id: I9cc3ff8c469fa5e4b22daec715d04148033f46f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/224837
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Batch files should use CRLF endings. LF endings mostly
work but in some situations they cause random errors like
goto commands failing for mysterious reasons. See
golang.org/issue/37791 for more information.
Next CL triggered one of such bug (a label was not being
recognized), so prepare for it by converting to CRLF.
This CL also touches all existing batch files to force git
to update the line endings (unfortunately, changing
.gitattributes only has effect next time the file is checked
out or modified).
Fixes#37791
Updates #9281
Change-Id: I6f9a114351cb7ac9881914400aa210c930eb8cc1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/96495
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
This commit extends the -spectre flag to cmd/asm and adds
a new Spectre mitigation mode "ret", which enables the use
of retpolines.
Retpolines prevent speculation about the target of an indirect
jump or call and are described in more detail here:
https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886
Change-Id: I4f2cb982fa94e44d91e49bd98974fd125619c93a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/222661
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This commit adds a new cmd/compile flag -spectre,
which accepts a comma-separated list of possible
Spectre mitigations to apply, or the empty string (none),
or "all". The only known mitigation right now is "index",
which uses conditional moves to ensure that x86-64 CPUs
do not speculate past index bounds checks.
Speculating past index bounds checks may be problematic
on systems running privileged servers that accept requests
from untrusted users who can execute their own programs
on the same machine. (And some more constraints that
make it even more unlikely in practice.)
The cases this protects against are analogous to the ones
Microsoft explains in the "Array out of bounds load/store feeding ..."
sections here:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/security/developer-guidance-speculative-execution?view=vs-2019#array-out-of-bounds-load-feeding-an-indirect-branch
Change-Id: Ib7532d7e12466b17e04c4e2075c2a456dc98f610
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/222660
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
//line bogo.go:9999999 will cause 'go tool objdump' to crash
unless bogo.go has that many lines. Guard the array index
and return innocuous values (nil, nil) from the file cache.
Fixes#36683
Change-Id: I4a9f8444dc611654d270cc876e8848dfd2f84770
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/223081
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
With a clean cache on a laptop
before change
time go run run.go -- . fixedbugs
real 2m10.195s
user 3m16.547s
sys 1m52.939s
Or, before, directly after make.bash (the actual use case we care about)
time go run run.go -- . fixedbugs
real 2m8.704s
user 3m12.327s
sys 1m49.123s
after change
time go run run.go -- . fixedbugs
real 1m38.915s
user 2m38.389s
sys 1m8.490s
Tests, fortunately, still seem to pass.
Latest version of this takes the slow route for cross-compilation, which includes wasm.
Change-Id: Iad19951612defa96c4e9830bce920c5e8733834a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/223083
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The default is for later flags to override earlier ones,
so if the asmcheck set flags, it lost the important -S=2.
Change-Id: Id538254908d658da2acb55157ac4f6fa44f6a467
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/222820
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
If typehash (used by reflect) does not match the built-in map's hash,
then problems occur. If a map is built using reflect, and then
assigned to a variable of map type, the hash function can change. That
causes very bad things.
This issue is rare. MapOf consults a cache of all types that occur in
the binary before making a new one. To make a true new map type (with
a hash function derived from typehash) that map type must not occur in
the binary anywhere. But to cause the bug, we need a variable of that
type in order to assign to it. The only way to make that work is to
use a named map type for the variable, so it is distinct from the
unnamed version that MapOf looks for.
Fixes#37716
Change-Id: I3537bfceca8cbfa1af84202f432f3c06953fe0ed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/222357
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Use a separate compiler pass to introduce complicated x86 addressing
modes. Loads in the normal architecture rules (for x86 and all other
platforms) can have constant offsets (AuxInt values) and symbols (Aux
values), but no more.
The complex addressing modes (x+y, x+2*y, etc.) are introduced in a
separate pass that combines loads with LEAQx ops.
Organizing rewrites this way simplifies the number of rewrites
required, as there are lots of different rule orderings that have to
be specified to ensure these complex addressing modes are always found
if they are possible.
Update #36468
Change-Id: I5b4bf7b03a1e731d6dfeb9ef19b376175f3b4b44
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/217097
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
CL 212777 added a check to isNonNegative
to return true for unsigned values.
However, the SSA backend isn't type safe
enough for that to be sound.
The other checks in isNonNegative
look only at the pattern of bits.
Remove the type-based check.
Updates #37753
Change-Id: I059d0e86353453133f2a160dce53af299f42e533
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/222620
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
-gcflags=-flag means apply the flags only to the package named
on the command line (the main package, for these tests).
-gcflags=all=-flag means apply the flags to everything in the build,
including the standard library.
cmd/dist uses -gcflags=all=$GO_GCFLAGS, so test/run should do the same,
as the comment already explains, to avoid rebuilding the entire standard
library without the flags during test/run's builds.
We changed the scope of the flags without a pattern a few releases
ago and missed this one.
Change-Id: I039e60ca619d39e5b502261d4a73e1afc7e3f9fc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/213827
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This is one of several changes that were part of a larger rewrite
which I made in early 2019 after switching to the new number literal
syntax implementation. The purpose of the rewrite was to simplify
reading of source code (Unicode character by character) and speed up
the scanner but was never submitted for review due to other priorities.
Part 2 of 3:
This change contains improvements to the scanner error messages:
- Use "rune literal" rather than "character literal" to match the
spec nomenclature.
- Shorter, more to the point error messages.
(For instance, "more than one character in rune literal" rather
than "invalid character literal (more than one character)", etc.)
Change-Id: I1aaf79003374a68dbb05926437ed305cf2a8ec96
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221602
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
There are still two places in src/runtime/string.go that use
staticbytes, so we cannot delete it just yet.
There is a new codegen test to verify that the index calculation
is constant-folded, at least on amd64. ppc64, mips[64] and s390x
cannot currently do that.
There is also a new runtime benchmark to ensure that this does not
slow down performance (tested against parent commit):
name old time/op new time/op delta
ConvT2EByteSized/bool-4 1.07ns ± 1% 1.07ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.060 n=14+15)
ConvT2EByteSized/uint8-4 1.06ns ± 1% 1.07ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.095 n=14+15)
Updates #37612
Change-Id: I5ec30738edaa48cda78dfab4a78e24a32fa7fd6a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221957
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Trying this CL again, with a fixed test that allows platforms
to disagree on the exact behavior of converting NaNs.
We store 32-bit floating point constants in a 64-bit field, by
converting that 32-bit float to 64-bit float to store it, and convert
it back to use it.
That works for *almost* all floating-point constants. The exception is
signaling NaNs. The round trip described above means we can't represent
a 32-bit signaling NaN, because conversions strip the signaling bit.
To fix this issue, just forbid NaNs as floating-point constants in SSA
form. This shouldn't affect any real-world code, as people seldom
constant-propagate NaNs (except in test code).
Additionally, NaNs are somewhat underspecified (which of the many NaNs
do you get when dividing 0/0?), so when cross-compiling there's a
danger of using the compiler machine's NaN regime for some math, and
the target machine's NaN regime for other math. Better to use the
target machine's NaN regime always.
Update #36400
Change-Id: Idf203b688a15abceabbd66ba290d4e9f63619ecb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221790
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Print the bytes of the instruction that generated a SIGILL.
This should help us respond to bug reports without having to
go back-and-forth with the reporter to get the instruction involved.
Might also help with SIGILL problems that are difficult to reproduce.
Update #37513
Change-Id: I33059b1dbfc97bce16142a843f32a88a6547e280
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221431
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Open-coded defers were fixed and re-enabled on riscv64, however this test was
inadvertantly left disabled.
Updates #36786
Change-Id: I128fc84baa3d51f50d173e19e52051dc4d9a07c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220920
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The existing implementation outputs inline cost iff function cannot be inlined with Debug['m'] > 1, the cost info is also useful if the function is inlineable.
Fixes#36780
Change-Id: Ic96f6baf96aee25fb4b33d31d4d644dc2310e536
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216778
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The generic Greater and Geq ops can always be replaced with the Less and
Leq ops. This CL therefore removes them. This simplifies the compiler since
it reduces the number of operations that need handling in both code and in
rewrite rules. This will be especially true when adding control flow
optimizations such as the integer-in-range optimizations in CL 165998.
Change-Id: If0648b2b19998ac1bddccbf251283f3be4ec3040
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220417
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Ensure that any comparison between two values has the same argument
order. This helps ensure that they can be eliminated during the
lowered CSE pass which will be particularly important if we eliminate
the Greater and Geq ops (see #37316).
Example:
CMP R0, R1
BLT L1
CMP R1, R0 // different order, cannot eliminate
BEQ L2
CMP R0, R1
BLT L1
CMP R0, R1 // same order, can eliminate
BEQ L2
This does have some drawbacks. Notably comparisons might 'flip'
direction in the assembly output after even small changes to the
code or compiler. It should help make optimizations more reliable
however.
compilecmp master -> HEAD
master (218f4572f5): text/template: make reflect.Value indirections more robust
HEAD (f1661fef3e): cmd/compile: canonicalize comparison argument order
platform: linux/amd64
file before after Δ %
api 6063927 6068023 +4096 +0.068%
asm 5191757 5183565 -8192 -0.158%
cgo 4893518 4901710 +8192 +0.167%
cover 5330345 5326249 -4096 -0.077%
fix 3417778 3421874 +4096 +0.120%
pprof 14889456 14885360 -4096 -0.028%
test2json 2848138 2844042 -4096 -0.144%
trace 11746239 11733951 -12288 -0.105%
total 132739173 132722789 -16384 -0.012%
Change-Id: I11736b3fe2a4553f6fc65018f475e88217fa22f9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220425
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This reverts CL 213477.
Reason for revert: tests are failing on linux-mips*-rtrk builders.
Change-Id: I8168f7450890233f1bd7e53930b73693c26d4dc0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220897
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
We store 32-bit floating point constants in a 64-bit field, by
converting that 32-bit float to 64-bit float to store it, and convert
it back to use it.
That works for *almost* all floating-point constants. The exception is
signaling NaNs. The round trip described above means we can't represent
a 32-bit signaling NaN, because conversions strip the signaling bit.
To fix this issue, just forbid NaNs as floating-point constants in SSA
form. This shouldn't affect any real-world code, as people seldom
constant-propagate NaNs (except in test code).
Additionally, NaNs are somewhat underspecified (which of the many NaNs
do you get when dividing 0/0?), so when cross-compiling there's a
danger of using the compiler machine's NaN regime for some math, and
the target machine's NaN regime for other math. Better to use the
target machine's NaN regime always.
This has been a bug since 1.10, and there's an easy workaround
(declare a global varaible containing the signaling NaN pattern, and
use that as the argument to math.Float32frombits) so we'll fix it in
1.15.
Fixes#36400
Update #36399
Change-Id: Icf155e743281560eda2eed953d19a829552ccfda
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/213477
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The address calculations in the example end up doing x << 4 + y + 0.
Before this CL we use a SHLQ+LEAQ. Since the constant offset is 0,
we can use SHLQ+ADDQ instead.
Change-Id: Ia048c4fdbb3a42121c7e1ab707961062e8247fca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/209959
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The wrapper takes a pointer to the argument, not the argument itself.
Fixes#36705
Change-Id: I566d4457d00bf5b84e4a8315a26516975f0d7e10
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/215942
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
We should panic in this situation. Rewriting to a SSA op just leads
to a compiler panic.
Fixes#36259
Change-Id: I6e0bccbed7dd0fdac7ebae76b98a211947947386
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/212405
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
• Inline check function because it's more readable.
• Delete toolPath because it was unused.
• Use strings.TrimPrefix because it's simpler.
• Remove out variable because its value was unused.
• Rename serr to err because it's more consistent.
Change-Id: I084fb4f8b399578834d5eea29a673c386cf3a357
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/218701
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Hajime Hoshi <hajimehoshi@gmail.com>
The error message is now positioned at the statement position (which is
an identifing token, such as the '=' for assignments); and in case of
assignments it emphasizes the assignment by putting the Lhs and Rhs
in parentheses. Finally, the wording is changed from "use of * as value"
to the stronger "cannot use * as value" (for which there is precedent
elsewhere in the parser).
Fixes#36858.
Change-Id: Ic3f101bba50f58e3a1d9b29645066634631f2d61
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/218337
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Brad's battery died on a plane and the file stayed open for 8 years
without anyone noticing. 😄
Someone noticed in https://github.com/gopherjs/gopherjs/pull/950.
Updates #2833
Change-Id: I46b28ac014a8c355be94e026615f119f96e5d51a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/218700
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
The R_CALLRISCV relocation marker is on the JALR instruction, however the actual
relocation is currently two instructions previous for the AUIPC+ADDI sequence.
Adjust the platform dependent offset accordingly and re-enable open-coded defers.
Fixes#36786.
Change-Id: I71597c193c447930fbe94ce44b7355e89ae877bb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216797
Run-TryBot: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This test expects that open-coded defers are enabled, which is not currently
the case on riscv64.
Updates issue #27532 and #36786.
Change-Id: I94bb558c5b0734b4cfe5ae12873be81026009bcf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216777
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Open-coded defers are currently broken on riscv64 - disable them for the
time being. All of the standard package tests now pass on linux/riscv64.
Updates issue #27532 and #36786
Change-Id: I20fc25ce91dfad48be32409ba5c64ca9a6acef1d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216517
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
On PPC64, MOVWload, MOVDload, and MOVDstore are assembled to a
"DS from" instruction which requiers the offset is a multiple of
4. Only fold offset to such instructions if it is a multiple of 4.
Fixes#36723.
"GOARCH=ppc64 GOOS=linux go build -gcflags=all=-d=ssa/check/on std cmd"
passes now.
Change-Id: I67f2a6ac02f0d33d470f68ff54936c289a4c765b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216379
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This disables some tests that are unsupported on riscv64 and adds support
for risc64 to test/nosplit.
Updates #27532, #36739 and #36765
Change-Id: I0a57797a05bc80236709fc240c0a0efb0ee0d16b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216263
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
