I was wrong. There was a need to loop here.
Fixes#24761
Change-Id: If13b3ab72febde930bdaebdddd1c05e0d0446020
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105615
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The check was previously disallowing package main from even importing
a non-function symbol named "main".
Fixes#24801.
Change-Id: I849b9713890429f0a16860ef16b5dc7e970d04a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/106120
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Also, when statically building itabs, compare *types.Sym instead of
name alone so that method sets with duplicate non-exported methods are
handled correctly.
Fixes#24693.
Change-Id: I2db8a3d6e80991a71fef5586a15134b6de116269
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105039
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Previously, constant pointer-typed expressions could use either Mpint
or NilVal as their Val depending on their construction, but const.go
expects each type to have a single corresponding Val kind.
This CL changes pointer-typed expressions to exclusively use Mpint.
Fixes#21221.
Change-Id: I6ba36c9b11eb19a68306f0b296acb11a8c254c41
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105315
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Don't report errors if we don't have a correct type switch
guard; instead ignore it and leave it to the type-checker
to report the error. This leads to better error messages
concentrating on the type switch guard rather than errors
around (confusing) syntactic details.
Also clean up some code setting up AssertExpr (they never
have a nil Type field) and remove some incorrect TODOs.
Fixes#24470.
Change-Id: I69512f36e0417e3b5ea9c8856768e04b19d654a8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/103615
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
When test/run script was removed, these two tests
were changed to be executed by test/run.go.
Because errchk does not exit with non-zero status on
errors, they were silently failing for a while.
This change makes 2 things:
1. Compile tested packages in GOROOT/test to match older runner script
behavior (strictly required only in bug345, optional in bug248)
2. Check command output with "(?m)^BUG" regexp.
It approximates older `grep -q '^BUG' that was used before.
See referenced issue for detailed explanation.
Fixes#24629
Change-Id: Ie888dcdb4e25cdbb19d434bbc5cb03eb633e9ee8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/104095
Run-TryBot: Iskander Sharipov <iskander.sharipov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
CL 38338 introduced SSA rules to optimize two types of pointer equality
tests: a pointer compared with itself, and comparison of addresses taken
of two symbols which may have the same base. This patch adds rules to
apply the same optimization to pointer inequality tests, which also ensures
that two pointers to zero-width types cannot be both equal and unequal
at the same time.
Fixes#24503.
Change-Id: Ic828aeb86ae2e680caf66c35f4c247674768a9ba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/102275
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
In expandmeth, we call expand1/expand0 to build a list of all
candidate methods to promote, and then we use dotpath to prune down
which names actually resolve to a promoted method and how.
However, previously we still computed "followsptr" based on the
expand1/expand0 traversal (which is depth-first), rather than
dotpath (which is breadth-first). The result is that we could
sometimes end up miscomputing whether a particular promoted method
involves a pointer traversal, which could result in bad code
generation for method trampolines.
Fixes#24547.
Change-Id: I57dc014466d81c165b05d78b98610dc3765b7a90
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/102618
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The atomic add instructions modify the condition code and so need to
be marked as clobbering flags.
Fixes#24449.
Change-Id: Ic69c8d775fbdbfb2a56c5e0cfca7a49c0d7f6897
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/101455
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Currently, order desugars map assignment operations like
m[k] op= r
into
m[k] = m[k] op r
which in turn is transformed during walk into:
tmp := *mapaccess(m, k)
tmp = tmp op r
*mapassign(m, k) = tmp
However, this is suboptimal, as we could instead produce just:
*mapassign(m, k) op= r
One complication though is if "r == 0", then "m[k] /= r" and "m[k] %=
r" will panic, and they need to do so *before* calling mapassign,
otherwise we may insert a new zero-value element into the map.
It would be spec compliant to just emit the "r != 0" check before
calling mapassign (see #23735), but currently these checks aren't
generated until SSA construction. For now, it's simpler to continue
desugaring /= and %= into two map indexing operations.
Fixes#23661.
Change-Id: I46e3739d9adef10e92b46fdd78b88d5aabe68952
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/91557
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
When the slice/string length is very large,
probably artifically large as in CL 97523,
adding BX (length) to R11 (pointer) overflows.
As a result, checking DI < R11 yields the wrong result.
Since they will be equal when the loop is done,
just check DI != R11 instead.
Yes, the pointer itself could overflow, but if that happens,
something else has gone pretty wrong; not our concern here.
Fixes#24187
Change-Id: I2f60fc6ccae739345d01bc80528560726ad4f8c6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/97802
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
OCOMPLIT stores the pre-typechecked type in n.Right, and then moves it
to n.Type. However, it wasn't clearing n.Right, so n.Right continued
to point to the OTYPE node. (Exception: slice literals reused n.Right
to store the array length.)
When exporting inline function bodies, we don't expect to need to save
any type aliases. Doing so wouldn't be wrong per se, but it's
completely unnecessary and would just bloat the export data.
However, reexportdep (whose role is to identify types needed by inline
function bodies) uses a generic tree traversal mechanism, which visits
n.Right even for O{ARRAY,MAP,STRUCT}LIT nodes. This means it finds the
OTYPE node, and mistakenly interpreted that the type alias needs to be
exported.
The straight forward fix is to just clear n.Right when typechecking
composite literals.
Fixes#24173.
Change-Id: Ia2d556bfdd806c83695b08e18b6cd71eff0772fc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/97719
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Otherwise, the error can be confusing if one forgets or doesn't know
that the builtin is being shadowed, which is not common practice.
Fixes#22822.
Change-Id: I735393b5ce28cb83815a1c3f7cd2e7bb5080a32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/97455
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This change enables printing of relative column information if a
prior line directive specified a valid column. If there was no
line directive, or the line directive didn't specify a column
(or the -C flag is specified), no column information is shown in
file positions.
Implementation: Column values (and line values, for that matter)
that are zero are interpreted as "unknown". A line directive that
doesn't specify a column records that as a zero column in the
respective PosBase data structure. When computing relative columns,
a relative value is zero of the base's column value is zero.
When formatting a position, a zero column value is not printed.
To make this work without special cases, the PosBase for a file
is given a concrete (non-0:0) position 1:1 with the PosBase's
line and column also being 1:1. In other words, at the position
1:1 of a file, it's relative positions are starting with 1:1 as
one would expect.
In the package syntax, this requires self-recursive PosBases for
file bases, matching what cmd/internal/src.PosBase was already
doing. In src.PosBase, file and inlining bases also need to be
based at 1:1 to indicate "known" positions.
This change completes the cmd/compiler part of the issue below.
Fixes#22662.
Change-Id: I6c3d2dee26709581fba0d0261b1d12e93f1cba1a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/97375
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
We accidentally overlooked needing to still visit Ninit for OIF
statements with constant conditions in golang.org/cl/96778.
Fixes#24120.
Change-Id: I5b341913065ff90e1163fb872b9e8d47e2a789d2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/97475
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Extend cmd/internal/src.PosBase to track column information,
and adjust the meaning of the PosBase position to mean the
position at which the PosBase's relative (line, col) position
starts (rather than indicating the position of the //line
directive). Because this semantic change is made in the
compiler's noder, it doesn't affect the logic of src.PosBase,
only its test setup (where PosBases are constructed with
corrected incomming positions). In short, src.PosBase now
matches syntax.PosBase with respect to the semantics of
src.PosBase.pos.
For #22662.
Change-Id: I5b1451cb88fff3f149920c2eec08b6167955ce27
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/96535
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
When we go from a branch block to a plain block, reset the
branch prediction bit. Downstream passes asssume that if the
branch prediction is set, then the block has 2 successors.
Fixes#23504
Change-Id: I2898ec002228b2e34fe80ce420c6939201c0a5aa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/88955
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
This replaces the contiguous heap arena mapping with a potentially
sparse mapping that can support heap mappings anywhere in the address
space.
This has several advantages over the current approach:
* There is no longer any limit on the size of the Go heap. (Currently
it's limited to 512GB.) Hence, this fixes#10460.
* It eliminates many failures modes of heap initialization and
growing. In particular it eliminates any possibility of panicking
with an address space conflict. This can happen for many reasons and
even causes a low but steady rate of TSAN test failures because of
conflicts with the TSAN runtime. See #16936 and #11993.
* It eliminates the notion of "non-reserved" heap, which was added
because creating huge address space reservations (particularly on
64-bit) led to huge process VSIZE. This was at best confusing and at
worst conflicted badly with ulimit -v. However, the non-reserved
heap logic is complicated, can race with other mappings in non-pure
Go binaries (e.g., #18976), and requires that the entire heap be
either reserved or non-reserved. We currently maintain the latter
property, but it's quite difficult to convince yourself of that, and
hence difficult to keep correct. This logic is still present, but
will be removed in the next CL.
* It fixes problems on 32-bit where skipping over parts of the address
space leads to mapping huge (and never-to-be-used) metadata
structures. See #19831.
This also completely rewrites and significantly simplifies
mheap.sysAlloc, which has been a source of many bugs. E.g., #21044,
#20259, #18651, and #13143 (and maybe #23222).
This change also makes it possible to allocate individual objects
larger than 512GB. As a result, a few tests that expected huge
allocations to fail needed to be changed to make even larger
allocations. However, at the moment attempting to allocate a humongous
object may cause the program to freeze for several minutes on Linux as
we fall back to probing every page with addrspace_free. That logic
(and this failure mode) will be removed in the next CL.
Fixes#10460.
Fixes#22204 (since it rewrites the code involved).
This slightly slows down compilebench and the x/benchmarks garbage
benchmark.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 184ms ± 1% 185ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.065 n=10+9)
Unicode 86.9ms ± 3% 86.3ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.631 n=10+10)
GoTypes 599ms ± 0% 602ms ± 0% +0.56% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Compiler 2.87s ± 1% 2.89s ± 1% +0.51% (p=0.002 n=9+10)
SSA 7.29s ± 1% 7.25s ± 1% ~ (p=0.182 n=10+9)
Flate 118ms ± 2% 118ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.113 n=9+9)
GoParser 147ms ± 1% 148ms ± 1% +1.07% (p=0.003 n=9+10)
Reflect 401ms ± 1% 404ms ± 1% +0.71% (p=0.003 n=10+9)
Tar 175ms ± 1% 175ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.604 n=9+10)
XML 209ms ± 1% 210ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.052 n=10+10)
(https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20171231.4)
name old time/op new time/op delta
Garbage/benchmem-MB=64-12 2.23ms ± 1% 2.25ms ± 1% +0.84% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
(https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20171231.3)
Relative to the start of the sparse heap changes (starting at and
including "runtime: fix various contiguous bitmap assumptions"),
overall slowdown is roughly 1% on GC-intensive benchmarks:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 183ms ± 1% 185ms ± 1% +1.32% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Unicode 84.9ms ± 2% 86.3ms ± 1% +1.65% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
GoTypes 595ms ± 1% 602ms ± 0% +1.19% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Compiler 2.86s ± 0% 2.89s ± 1% +0.91% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
SSA 7.19s ± 0% 7.25s ± 1% +0.75% (p=0.000 n=8+9)
Flate 117ms ± 1% 118ms ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
GoParser 146ms ± 2% 148ms ± 1% +1.48% (p=0.002 n=10+10)
Reflect 398ms ± 1% 404ms ± 1% +1.51% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Tar 173ms ± 1% 175ms ± 1% +1.17% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
XML 208ms ± 1% 210ms ± 1% +0.62% (p=0.011 n=10+10)
[Geo mean] 369ms 373ms +1.17%
(https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20180101.2)
name old time/op new time/op delta
Garbage/benchmem-MB=64-12 2.22ms ± 1% 2.25ms ± 1% +1.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
(https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20180101.3)
Change-Id: I5daf4cfec24b252e5a57001f0a6c03f22479d0f0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/85887
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
The scanner assumed that ~ really meant ^, which may be helpful when
coming from C. But ~ is not a valid Go token, and pretending that it
should be ^ can lead to confusing error messages. Better to be upfront
about it and complain about the invalid character in the first place.
This was code "inherited" from the original yacc parser which was
derived from a C compiler. It's 10 years later and we can probably
assume that people are less confused about C and Go.
Fixes#23587.
Change-Id: I8d8f9b55b0dff009b75c1530d729bf9092c5aea6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/94160
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Assume that an expression that is not a function call in a defer/go
statement is indeed a function that is just missing its invocation.
Report the error but continue with a sane syntax tree.
Fixes#23586.
Change-Id: Ib45ebac57c83b3e39ae4a1b137ffa291dec5b50d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/94156
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Previously, if we typechecked a statement like
var x bool = p1.f == p2.f && p1.g == p2.g
we would correctly update the '&&' node's type from 'untyped bool' to
'bool', but the '==' nodes would stay 'untyped bool'. This is
inconsistent, and caused consistency checks during walk to fail.
This CL doesn't pass toolstash because it seems to slightly affect the
register allocator's heuristics. (Presumably 'untyped bool's were
previously making it all the way through SSA?)
Fixes#23414.
Change-Id: Ia85f8cfc69b5ba35dfeb157f4edf57612ecc3285
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/94022
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Per the language spec clarification in https://golang.org/cl/14727.
Updates #12576
Updates #12621
Change-Id: I1e459c3c11a571bd29582761faacaa9ca3178ba6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/91895
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The sub-word shifts need to sign-extend before shifting, to avoid
bringing in data from higher in the argument.
Fixes#23812
Change-Id: I0a95a0b49c48f3b40b85765bb4a9bb492be0cd73
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/93716
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Fixes#23732
Disambiguate "too few" or "too many" values in struct
initializer messages by reporting the name of the literal.
After:
issue23732.go:27:3: too few values in Foo literal
issue23732.go:34:12: too many values in Bar literal
issue23732.go:40:6: too few values in Foo literal
issue23732.go:40:12: too many values in Bar literal
Change-Id: Ieca37298441d907ac78ffe960c5ab55741a362ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/93277
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Now that the buffered write barrier is implemented for all
architectures, we can remove the old eager write barrier
implementation. This CL removes the implementation from the runtime,
support in the compiler for calling it, and updates some compiler
tests that relied on the old eager barrier support. It also makes sure
that all of the useful comments from the old write barrier
implementation still have a place to live.
Fixes#22460.
Updates #21640 since this fixes the layering concerns of the write
barrier (but not the other things in that issue).
Change-Id: I580f93c152e89607e0a72fe43370237ba97bae74
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/92705
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When loading multiple elements of an array into a single register,
make sure we treat them as unsigned. When treated as signed, the
upper bits might all be set, causing the shift-or combo to clobber
the values higher in the register.
Fixes#23719.
Change-Id: Ic87da03e9bd0fe2c60bb214b99f846e4e9446052
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/92335
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
The fix is CL 91035.
Build only with gccgo at the moment, as it hits issue #23546.
Updates #23545.
Change-Id: I3a1367bb31b04773d31f71016f8fd7bd1855d7b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/89735
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The compiler allows code to have multiple differently-typed views of a
single argument. For instance, if we have
func f(x float64) {
y := *(*int64)(unsafe.Pointer(&x))
...
}
Then in SSA we get two OpArg ops, one with float64 type and one with
int64 type.
The compiler will try to reuse argument slots for spill slots. It
checks that the argument slot is dead by consulting an interference
graph.
When building the interference graph, we normally ignore cross-type
edges because the values on either end of that edge can't be allocated
to the same slot. (This is just a space-saving optimization.) This
rule breaks down when one of the values is an argument, because of the
multiple views described above. If we're spilling a float64, it is not
enough that the float64 version of x is dead; the int64 version of x
has to be dead also.
Remove the optimization of not recording interference edges if types
don't match. That optimization is incorrect if one of the values
connected by the edge is an argument.
Fixes#23522
Change-Id: I361f85d80fe3bc7249014ca2c3ec887c3dc30271
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/89335
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
A Select Op could produce a value with upper 32 bits NOT zeroed,
for example, Div32 is lowered to (Select0 (DIVL x y)).
In theory, we could look into the argument of a Select to decide
whether the upper bits are zeroed. As it is late in release cycle,
just disable this optimization for Select for now.
Fixes#23305.
Change-Id: Icf665a2af9ccb0a7ba0ae00c683c9e349638bf85
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/85736
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
My previous fix for issue 23179 was incomplete; it turns out that if
an unnamed parameter is below a specific size threshold, it gets
register-promoted away by the compiler (hence not encountered during
some parts of DWARF inline info processing), but if it is sufficiently
large, it is allocated to the stack as a named variable and treated as
a regular parameter by DWARF generation. Interestingly, something in
the ppc64le build of k8s causes an unnamed parameter to be retained
(where on amd64 it is deleted), meaning that this wasn't caught in my
amd64 testing.
The fix is to insure that "_" params are treated in the same way that
"~r%d" return temps are when matching up post-optimization inlined
routine params with pre-inlining declarations. I've also updated the
test case to include a "_" parameter with a very large size, which
also triggers the bug on amd64.
Fixes#23179.
Change-Id: I961c84cc7a873ad3f8f91db098a5e13896c4856e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/84975
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
The helper routine for returning pre-inlining parameter declarations
wasn't properly handling the case where you have more than one
parameter named "_" in a function signature; this triggered a map
collision later on when the function was inlined and DWARF was
generated for the inlined routine instance.
Fixes#23179.
Change-Id: I12e5d6556ec5ce08e982a6b53666a4dcc1d22201
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/84755
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
We can't currently inline functions that contain closures anyway, so
just delete this budgeting code for now. Re-enable once we can (if
ever) inline functions with nested closures.
Updates #15561.
Fixes#23093.
Change-Id: Idc5f8e042ccfcc8921022e58d3843719d4ab821e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/83538
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Pointer arithemetic is done mod 2^32 on 386, so we can just
drop the high bits of any large constant offsets.
The bounds check will make sure wraparounds are never observed.
Fixes#21655
Change-Id: I68ae5bbea9f02c73968ea2b21ca017e5ecb89223
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82675
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Make sure that when we're assigning to a map, we evaluate the
right-hand side before we attempt to insert into the map.
We used to evaluate the left-hand side to a pointer-to-slot-in-bucket
(which as a side effect does len(m)++), then evaluate the right-hand side,
then do the assignment. That clearly isn't correct when the right-hand side
might panic.
Fixes#22881
Change-Id: I42a62870ff4bf480568c9bdbf0bb18958962bdf0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81817
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The DWARF inline info generation hooks weren't properly
handling unused auto vars in certain cases, triggering an assert (now
fixed). Also with this change, introduce a new autom "flavor" to
use for autom entries that are added to insure that a specific
auto type makes it into the linker (this is a follow-on to the fix
for 22941).
Fixes#22962.
Change-Id: I7a2d8caf47f6ca897b12acb6a6de0eb25f5cac8f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81557
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The code that generates the list of DWARF variables for a function
(params and autos) will emit a "no-location" entry in the DWARF for a
user var that appears in the original pre-optimization version of the
function but is no longer around when optimization is complete. The
intent is that if a GDB user types "print foo" (where foo has been
optimized out), the response will be "<optimized out>" as opposed to
"there is no such variable 'foo'). This change fixes said code to
include vars on the autom list for the function, to insure that the
type symbol for the variable makes it to the linker.
Fixes#22941.
Change-Id: Id29f1f39d68fbb798602dfd6728603040624fc41
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81415
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
